LabourMatters has the details of the latest twist in Labour’s financial problems. Not having a group of activists and MPs together in one place where they can mutter their unhappiness with Gordon Brown is of course one other effect of cancellation…
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
“Build, baby, build” but don’t lower our ambitions on affordability (Victor Chamberlain)
-
Twenty-six years of evidence on drugs. Twenty-six years of cowardice. (Tanya Park)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Gaza (Tom Arms)
-
The Lib Dem strategy review (Rob Blackie)
-
Don't mention the Isle of Wight Separatists' 1950s terror campaign
-
Fergus McClelland was the last illegal major British child actor
-
Labour and the Liberals in 1924 and today
-
Family: Scene Through the Eye of a Lens
-
Brexit: The Uncivil War - the TV drama with Benedict Cumberbatch
-
A power vacuum?
-
HMO plan for Market Harborough's Bottom Club
-
I am liberal, woke and proud of it. We should all accept such descriptions with pride
-
The Joy of Six 1539
-
When the GIs came to Swansea
Recent Comments
Margaret
It's a few years ago now, but I remember having a problem with a car we had hired in Alaska, and having a long argument with a call-handler somewhere in the 'lo...
Caracatus
The thing is we can have lower taxes (for most) and better public services. The madness of the lost war on drugs which cost billions. Sorting social care, th...
paul barker
Can London build its way out of this crisis ? Londons population has gone up by more than half since the 90s & all the "Plans" are for it to go up more. Lo...
Steve Nash
I agree with KP that the International Aid and diplomatic Budget should increased, to challenge both Immigration and the need for Defence. It may not be the ch...
Tom Arms
@ John Kelly: I certainly didn't mean to imply that Gaza is peaceful. Sadly, civilians continue to die, humanitarian conditions remain appalling and Israel cont...


4 Comments
The end is nigh…
What is the truth of this story in the Times today [below], and is there a publicly available copy of the plans presented to the Federal Executive?
” Nick Clegg is giving himself unprecedented powers over the Liberal Democrats in the most wide-ranging revision of the party since its formation in 1988, The Times has learnt.
He is determined to overhaul an internal structure that allies say severely curtails the powers of the leader and splits internal controls between a series of committees.
Mr Clegg, who became leader in December, plans to turn the party’s traditional structure on its head, centralising all decision-making under a new “chief officers group” and diluting the roles of its committees.
Sources said that the move risks causing a serious rift between Mr Clegg and Lord Rennard, the party’s chief executive and the man in overall charge of the Liberal Democrats’ election campaigns. Under the shake-up Lord Rennard will become a non-voting member of the group and will report to the party leader.
Mr Clegg is understood to believe that the existing mesh of committees is too unwieldy and needs to be streamlined if the party is to have any chance of meeting its goals, chief among them doubling the number of Liberal Democrat MPs in the next two elections. “There is a multiplicity of committees in the name of transparency, but ultimately what happens is you don’t get any decisions being made at all,” one senior party insider said yesterday. “There are no clear lines of responsibility and accountability,” the source added.
The Liberal Democrat constitution is a throwback to the 1988 merger of the Liberal and SDP parties and leaves the leader without ultimate control. The SDP leader then, David Owen, opposed the merger and was suspicious of the Liberals’ decentralised structure. While some effort was made to centralise power in the merged entity, many of the old Liberal Party structures remain.
Supporters of the changes argue that the party has evolved since then in terms of its size and influence but that its organisational structure has stayed stuck in the 1980s. Others will argue that Mr Clegg’s move is a desperate power grab. Lord Rennard is understood to have strongly opposed the new structure.
Mr Clegg has already won support for his plan from the party’s federal executive, which this week signed up to the plan and sent it out for consultation. The new chief officers group, which will comprise senior members of the party’s committees, will be answerable to the federal executive.
Sources said that the aim was to introduce the new structure on a “suck it and see” basis, as an interim solution between now and the next general election. That way it can be introduced quickly as opposed to implementing the change via an amendment of the party’s underlying constitution. “The new group will decide everything. In one sense, it may be overkill, but the basic thrust of it is right,” the source said. “
It would be a good idea for the Lib Dems to scrap their spring conference too and concentrtae on improving regional conferences and on-line consultation.
This reinforces what we all already suspected- the General Election will be in 2010 not 2009. In which case, can we please use the 2009 Euro elections to talk about Europe (especially in places like London where there are no simultaneous local elections)…?