Lib Dems press on Kingsnorth climate camp policing

Lib Dem Voice has covered before the allegations of that the policing at the climate camp at Kingsnorth in August 2008 was unacceptable – click here for the archive. Lib Dem MPs are continuing to press the Home Office to present an honest account of what happened, and to state what lessons have been learned for future policing of peaceful protests.

Yesterday in the Commons, both Greg Mulholland and Chris Huhne asked the questions of the Government’s minister for policing. Here are the exchanges from Hansard:

Greg Mulholland (Leeds, North-West) (LD): What recent representations he has received on the policing of the Kingsnorth climate camp in August 2008. [283784]

The Minister for Policing, Crime and Counter-Terrorism (Mr. David Hanson): The Home Office has received a number of items of parliamentary and public correspondence relating to the policing tactics employed at Kingsnorth climate camp in August 2008.

Greg Mulholland: My constituents, James Chan, Stephen Halpin and Sunil Bhopal, attended the Kingsnorth camp and report that the police played music between 5 and 6 am, and prevented water and food from getting into the camp. Does the Minister think that that is acceptable policing, and will he tell the House what lessons have been learned from that as we look forward to the climate change camps this summer?

Mr. Hanson: I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for raising those points. He will know that the National Policing Improvement Agency, Kent police and the inspectorate of constabulary have looked at these issues. I am shortly expecting some reports on how policing was undertaken at the camps. It is important to recognise that the Government and the police are committed to allowing peaceful protest, and that we take the concerns that have been raised about some issues at the climate camp extremely seriously. I will receive shortly, and will publish for the House, reports on those issues, and I will look at what lessons can be learned.


Chris Huhne (Eastleigh) (LD): There appears to be a repeating pattern at protests, including the Kingsnorth climate camp, of some police officers failing to wear their identifying numerals. We saw that at the Countryside Alliance protests in 2004, again at the G20 protests—despite the assurances of senior officers beforehand—and, astonishingly, again at the Tamil protest in Parliament square just a day after the Metropolitan Police Commissioner had made it clear that that practice was unacceptable. What are Ministers doing to ensure that some police officers do not tar the reputation of the vast majority who are disciplined, public-spirited and unashamed to be identified as citizens in uniform?

Mr. Hanson: I regard it as a matter of course that police officers should be able to be identified in whatever activity they undertake, and that will be one of the issues that we consider in relation to the policing of this protest and others. We are expecting a report shortly, as I have said, and I raised in a letter to Kent police of 24 June the need for me to see their report of the incidents at Kingsnorth. I have had an assurance from the chief constable, Michael Fuller, in a letter dated 3 July that he intends to publish the report on the incidents. I want to obtain the facts, look at the issues and ensure that the lessons are learned.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.


  • I would like to see our MPs raising the treatment of Val and Emily in the House and supporting pressure for these so-called police offers (a.k.a violent thugs) to be prosecuted for assault. I am boiling with rage at what they did.

  • I would like the deliberate obscuring of identification by police officers to be a sacking offence (maybe even a criminal offence). It shows clear contempt of accountability and responsibility by the officer in question and therefore, in my mind, makes them unsuitable for that job.

    The police, out of necessity, have more power than ordinary citizens and the only way to be sure that power isn’t abused is if every exercise of that power is open, transparent and its wielder fully accountable.

    The reason I believe it seems to keep happening is that while senior officers might wax eloquently about their determination to ensure it doesn’t happen, nothing is actually done when it does.

    I will admit that there is the difficulty of having to identify someone who has hidden their identify.

  • Andrew Suffield 7th Jul '09 - 2:27pm

    I’d go one further and say that a police officer who has obscured or removed his identifying marks should be considered “out of uniform”, and hence his actions should be judged against the standard for an off-duty officer – so when he goes around beating people with a stick, that’s criminal assault & battery, not “acceptable behaviour in line with his orders”.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGeoffrey Payne 23rd Jan - 8:39am
    Sorry to see how the decade ended for Jo and I hope she will be back in Parliament one day soon. One thing for sure...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 23rd Jan - 8:21am
    Meetings ------ meetings
  • User AvatarNeil Fawcett 23rd Jan - 8:15am
    I mentioned having helped deliver some of those in Dorothy's first election at the Federal Board meeting on Saturday!
  • User AvatarMichael Morar 23rd Jan - 8:08am
    The world needs more Swinsons and fewer Johnsons.
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 23rd Jan - 6:08am
    Question: Is this a serious attempt at defending the Coalition years - or an attempt to prevent the Federal Board member's special status being challenged?...
  • User AvatarJames Belchamber 22nd Jan - 11:40pm
    Join! For only £1 a month YOU TOO can access the many POLICY PAPERS, hand-crafted by teams of authentic Liberal Democrats members. JOIN NOW!