Liberal Democrat manifesto by numbers

The Liberal Democrat manifesto by numbers:

  • 9 different formats for the manifesto (hard copy, video, on screen, iPhone app etc.)
  • 6 photos of Nick Clegg
  • 5 pages of index
  • 4 pages of detailed costsing
  • 4 steps to a fairer Britain
  • 3 photos of Vince Cable
  • 0 mentions of chocolate

Sarah Teather welcomes people to the launch and then Danny Alexander introduces the manifesto saying, “This manifesto is frank, is detailed and spells out all the difficult financial decisions we will have to make”.

It’s when Vince Cable steps up that the photographs really spring to life. Whilst Sarah and Danny were heard in polite silence, the background to Vince is the steady murmur of cameras clicking as he says, “We take the deficit seriously. That’s the elephant in the room … I guess I’m the elephant man.” He has a pop at both Labour and the Tories for launching their manifestos as if there wasn’t a deficit to tackle.

The manifesto identifies £15 billion of cuts, itemised in the document with £5 billion to then go on the party’s spending commitments and £10 billion to cutting the deficit.

However, “There is more to be done” to tackle the deficit. That will include public sector pension reform, a rapid defence review and savings on the vast government IT projects. If this saving can be achieved there is no need to an increase in taxation beyond the £2 billion levy on banks.

The rest of the tax changes in the manifesto balance – simplifying and making the system fairer, including most notably raising the income tax threshold to £10,000 per year. The changes will also encourage work and discourage pollution.

Then it’s over to Nick Clegg. “Every manifesto has to have an idea at its heart … I believe that every single person is extraordinary” but the tragedy is that not too many people do not get the chance to “live the life they want”. “Our manifesto will hardwire fairness into British society … [with] four steps to a fairer Britain”.

Launching the manifesto in the city, at the financial firm Bloomberg, doesn’t take the edge off Nick Clegg’s rhetoric about the failures of the financial system, the risks and gambles taken and the need to radically change the financial system.

“We can turn anger into hope, frustration into ambition,” adds Nick Clegg before adding that every line in the manifesto which involves spending money is fuly costed with the details in the manifesto. “The figures are there for everyone to see”, he says holding up the first page of costings from the manifesto. Labour and Tories are trying to “airbrush” the deficit out of the election, but the Liberal Democrat manifesto confronts the problem: “It’s wrong to promise something for nothing”. The manifesto is “hope married to credibility”.

Questions from journalists home in on the proposal to cut tax evasion by 10% (as with Danny Alexander’s interview on the Today program earlier in the day). Clegg defends the proposal, both by citing details but also by pointing out how modest a 10% saving is.

There’s also the inevitable hung Parliament question, which Clegg turns into an opportunity to repeat the four key policies from the manifesto’s cover – in a hung Parliament the party will argue for its priorities. When pressed on whether he thinks the party with the strongest mandate in a hung Parliament would be the party with the most votes or seats, Clegg says it’s “both”. In such a case there will be one party with a clear mandate and he says he won’t go into all sorts of hypothetical speculation about a photo finish. Pressed again, he says simply, “Both”.

Quick double take. Yes, it’s a journalist from the Guardian (Patrick Wintour), not a tabloid, who goes for the Lib Dems love immigrants and criminals mini-speech, er…, I mean series of questions.

Other details of note:

The party’s line on cleaning up political finance has been toughened up, with a new (lower) commitment to cap political donations at £10,000.

The party’s Freedom Bill will, “end plans to store your email and internet records without good cause” and “reduce the maximum period of pre-charge detention to 14 days”.

The manifesto also remembers that men are parents too, and indeed the first mention in the family section is to fathers (giving them the right to time off work for ante-natal appointments).

There is a significant commitment to libel law reform with the manifesto pledging to, “Protect free speech, investigative journalism and academic peer-reviewed publishing through reform of the English and Welsh libel laws – including by requiring corporations to show damage and prove malice or recklessness, and by providing a robust responsible journalism defence.”

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in General Election and Party policy and internal matters.


  • Painfully Liberal 14th Apr '10 - 9:45am

    A commitment to libel law reform is to be welcomed – though I’m not sure it’s so good it’s worth saying twice.

  • Painfully Liberal 14th Apr '10 - 10:52am

    I realise my previous comment makes no sense no the post has been edited. Trust me though, it was hilarious in its original context.

  • Anthony Aloysius St 14th Apr '10 - 12:21pm

    “However, “There is more to be done” to tackle the deficit. That will include public sector pension reform, a rapid defence review and savings on the vast government IT projects. If this saving can be achieved there is no need to an increase in taxation beyond the £2 billion levy on banks.”

    Can anyone tell me – are these other savings meant to eliminate the remainder of the “structural deficit”, which would require a further £30-40bn of savings? If so, have numbers been put to how much Cable thinks can be saved in each area?

  • Anthony Aloysius St 14th Apr '10 - 3:14pm

    The trouble is that total defence spending is less than £40bn, so it’s difficult to see more than (say) about 10% of what’s needed coming out of defence cuts (and if I remember correctly the party is already committed to financing an increase in services pay which would imply drastic cuts in administrative costs). And of course cancelling a _future_ Trident replacement isn’t going to help very much with the _existing_ structural deficit.

    Given that the party can hardly eschew IT altogether and take us back to the good old days of quill and parchment, I find it difficult to avoid concluding that the implication is a saving of something like £30bn a year from public service pensions. Isn’t that going to amount to a cut of several thousand pounds a year per public service pensioner, or have I got my sums wrong?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDenis Loretto 22nd Oct - 10:38am
    When MPs ask to switch from other parties we obviously have a procedure for thoroughly questioning them and assessing their motives and their intentions including...
  • User AvatarThomas 22nd Oct - 10:12am
    Based on what happened during the Canadian election, although Lee's views might have evolved, it is likely that Labour will unearth his past records on...
  • User Avatartheakes 22nd Oct - 10:06am
    Everyone has either said ot done things in their past that they regret or have changed mind on. It is the present and the future...
  • User Avatarexpats 22nd Oct - 10:05am
    David Evans 22nd Oct '19 - 9:09am,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,James (Pugh) – indeed you are absolutely right. How easy it was for our opponents to dupe Nick, Danny...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 22nd Oct - 9:56am
    David Raw 22nd Oct '19 - 9:46am There was a Ferrari dealer in Sevenoaks, but it has closed. We are further down the line, and...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 22nd Oct - 9:53am
    @ Tom Carney, "My first point is that areas are not poor – people are poor." Have you been to Oldham or Walsall recently? In...