LibLink: Vince Cable: Ministers must properly address the Special Educational Needs and Disability funding crisis

Vince Cable is holding a Westminster Hall debate on funding for special educational needs and disability this afternoon.

In an article for Politics Home, he outlines the impact on families when they don’t have the support that they need…

A single mum in a small flat with a child who needs constant attention while she tries to look after other children, and hold down a job to make ends meet; a couple who have sacrificed careers, holidays and a social life to care for a child with severe, complex needs, seeing the child growing up to an adulthood of continued dependence while they themselves are ageing and their own relationship is falling apart. There are numerous variations of these.

Of course, there are also happier stories.  Stories where support provided in school or via the local authority or health service makes all the difference.  But for every family who does not get the support they need, there is an unacceptable impact for parents and children alike.

Local authorities are under huge financial stress, however:

At a human level a painful conflict results between parents who want the best for their children (and have the law on their side) and local authorities who want to do their best but are under financial stress after years of painful cuts. More and more requests for EHCPs are being declined or delayed, and funding cuts have led to reductions in the specialist teachers and educational psychologists who provided expert advice to schools teaching SEND pupils. Rationing has taken the form of foot-dragging over ‘statements’, now ‘care plans’.  And attempts to mandate adequate local schooling rather than what parents consider to be superior specialist schools, often leading to tribunals, with additional cost, emotional stress and anger.

So is it just a question of more money?

But across the country, the Local Government Association has warned that the combination of budget cuts and rising demand is leading to children with SEND being turned away from mainstream schools, because councils’ lack the ability to provide extra help to those who need it. And while mainstream schooling will not be the right path for every child with SEND, this decision should always be a genuine choice based on the individual needs of parents and their children, not something they are pushed into because funding is not sufficient to support a child in the setting they choose.

You can read the whole article here. 

 

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Nigel Jones 13th Feb '19 - 6:43pm

    I hope as chair of the LDEA I can send a message about SEND. Vince is spot on to raise the subject of SEND in schools. He rightly shows in his article that it is wrong to blame local authorities and schools for the current difficulties. The rising need is partly due to better diagnosis and partly the increase in the number of children born in this ‘category’. There are two points to add.
    First, their needs are not helped by the pressure on schools to perform academically and to have strictly applied behaviour policies. This sometimes creates extreme tensions for teachers between care of the individual and overall classroom performance.
    Second, in some areas, such as dyslexia, there are children whose needs are not so great that they are categorised as SEND, yet need special attention. A piece of work by Warwick University has recently criticised the sharp line drawn, because sometimes in practice people are of different shades of need at different times in their education. Unfortunately, Warwickshire council has seized on this as an opportunity to try to find ways of justifying a reduction in spending on SEND because, of course they are short of money.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael 1 16th Jul - 11:25pm
    @david raw It's the truth that UC was not implemented (or virtually not at all) under the coalition and indeed most of those that went...
  • User AvatarMichael Sammon 16th Jul - 11:22pm
    It was alright. I like Iain and he does speak well of us at times. He is one of the more liberal conservatives and gives...
  • User AvatarMichael Sammon 16th Jul - 11:18pm
    Yes this sounds good. I am pro school uniforms as well by the way. I used to dread non uniform days as a child as...
  • User AvatarMichael 1 16th Jul - 10:30pm
    Actually not really the case @Paul Barker. The key is to look at polls conducted by the same company. They are almost equally divided between...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 16th Jul - 10:29pm
    @ Michael, Possibly you're right in saying there will only need to be a small pool of reserve labour. Maybe 2%. Perhaps 3%. Could be...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 16th Jul - 10:24pm
    Is our party really 'dominated by a variety of competing and incoherent personal interests', Jayne? (though I am glad of your personal approval, thank you!)....