Liberal Democrat peer and campaigning guru Chris Rennard went on Radio 4 yesterday to respond to the Earl of Glasgow saying that we should back down on Lords reform.
Lord Rennard said that there have been plans for an elected Lords were not Nick Clegg’s alone and that there had been efforts to reform the upper House for 50 years before Nick Clegg was born.
He took a mild swipe at his Liberal Democrat colleague Lord Steel when asked about the latter’s plans to limit the reforms to allowing voluntary retirement and sacking those peers who don’t attend. Those things, said Rennard, were very sensible and should be done but “there’s no substitute for democracy.”
Challenged about the Liberal Democrats’ poor poll ratings, Rennard reminded the audience that the pattern of the last few decades has been that we are lower in the polls between elections, but have elected between 50 and 60 MPs at the last four Westminster polls.
He also believes that it would not be be viable for Nick Clegg to give up the party leadership and retain his role as Deputy Prime Minister but he had some advice for how Nick should lead us into the 2015 election:
What Nick will need to do as DPM is to show what a difference the Liberal Democrats have made and why a majority for either Conservatives or Labour at the election would be a disaster.
You can listen to the whole interview here.
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Gateshead East branch meeting
Alistair Carmichael will not stand for the party leadership
An unexpected revelation from Lib Dem leader Vince Cable
With no guarantee of a People's Vote the PM will get no support from the Lib Dems
Tuesday reading
Was the SDP a success?
Suffolk - where self-help means doing something you've paid someone else to do...
Michael BG
David Raw
Innocent Bystander
Mike Jay
Glenn
Michael 1
2 Comments
There is no substitute for democracy if you want a house of representatives (small caps) but there are plenty of alternatives if you are looking for a house that drafts and revises. In fact you can have a representative house without democracy by appointing those who represent institutions, appointing previously elected persons on party lists, interest groups, or self-selected constituencies. what I believe you shouldnt have is a. members whose right is hereditary only or b. a second house of commons.
The US has a bicameral legislature, and it has become a gridlocking dogs dinner which has restricted democratic change in America, not enhanced it. Abolish the Lords – reforming it, I`m afraid, really does amount to a substitute for making the Commons more transparent and answerable.