The importance of next May
A blessing and a curse of a democracy is that elections keep on coming around. So while this year has been an exhausting one of election campaigns already, we also need to be turning our eyes to the local elections coming up in May.
Most of the seats up in May were last contested when the Conservatives were still on an electoral high back in 2021. Therefore they provide us with an important opportunity to follow up on our major gains from the Conservatives at both local and Westminster level since 2021. They also provide us with an important opportunity to continue to grow our strength more broadly, especially in areas where, now with a Labour government in Westminster, new possibilities are opening up.
But there is one sure-fire, 100% guaranteed, rock-solid way of repelling voters from us, and it is one we use far too often.
It is not having a Liberal Democrat on the ballot paper. Zero votes for the party guaranteed.
Both Labour and the Conservatives, for example, get very close now to having a full slate of candidates in local elections. We do not.
The good news is that since in the last Parliament we have collectively started focusing on really raising our candidate numbers in council contests, we have made good progress, both for by-elections and for the May rounds of elections.
Standing candidates is not only about credibility and relevance. It is also the way to get more people into the habit of regularly voting for the Liberal Democrats – a crucial step in building the sort of larger core vote for the party that will help us succeed more often.
With us having regained our third place in the House of Commons, continuing that progress in candidate numbers to help further establish ourselves is even more important next May.
If you have local elections coming up in your area, there are great training materials and supporting documents on how to increase your candidate numbers, and how to run a proper approval process. Drop me a line if you need help finding the support you need.
Good luck!
A 15th century technology still reigns supreme
The Electoral Commission’s report into the May and July elections contains some unsurprising, though reassuring news. Asked how they came across information about candidates for the general election, the most common answers people gave were:
- a leaflet or flyer from a candidate or political party (63%)
- TV news (48%)
- social media (39%)
- a news website (35%)
- TV debates (35%)
- word of mouth (24%)
Gutenberg’s 15th century invention made the printing of such leaflets first possible. The technology has evolved since then but then, but it is still very much the primary technology for election communication.
The full report is here with other important findings, including on the nature of harassment that candidates face and how that is changing.
A lesson from the USA
The electoral news from the US is a reminder to us all about how important it is for liberals to step up, to focus on the issues that matter most to voters – and to deliver on those issues. Incumbent parties and candidates who do not leave people feeling better off at the end of their term are treated harshly by the electorate.
Which is why, turning our eyes back to British politics, it will be so important for our 72 MPs to be able to show voters at the next Westminster general election that they have delivered on the issues which we campaigned on in the general election: in particular that much-repeated trio of health and social care; the cost of living; and the environment, especially sewage dumping.
How we deliver on those is different – and harder – in opposition than in government, but deliver we must. That will also be much easier in this Parliament given the greatly expanded Parliamentary opportunities that come from having 72 MPs. It is why, the day after Donald Trump’s election, Ed Davey was able to ask at PMQs about the implications for Ukraine, European defence and tariffs (and while the new Conservative Leader was squandering her questions asking for the PM to apologise for old tweets).
It is also why we now have three – three! – Select Committee chairs in the House of Commons – Layla Moran (Health and Social Care), Alistair Carmichael (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) and Jamie Stone (Petitions). In total there are now 55 – 55! – select committee posts held by Liberal Democrat MPs.
That is a massive expansion in our party’s ability to use Parliament to hold to account the government – and other powerful organisations too who can be hauled in front of select committees. It is also a massive expansion in our ability to get publicity for the party through the media. And it would not have been possible without the kind support of people like yourself, getting us from 15 to 72 MPs. Thank you.
Congratulations to…
The three local parties who have recruited the most new members locally in the last month are Colchester (England), Glasgow City (Scotland) and Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe (Wales). Well done to everyone involved in all three – and it is good to see those membership efforts happening not only in held Parliamentary seats but more widely too.
Congratulations also to Caroline Pidgeon, former councillor and London Assembly and now member of the House of Lords, who has just been elected chair of the English Liberal Democrats. That also means she will be joining the Federal Board.
The location of our Federal Conferences
“Why doesn’t the Lib Dem Federal Conference ever come to <insert lovely venue near you>?” That is a common question, and now Federal Conference Committee Cllr Nick da Costa has written a very helpful explainer. It goes into what goes into making a venue suitable and why the unusual requirements of a party conference means there is much less choice over venue than you might expect. You can read it here.
Autumn Conference 2025
Speaking of which, the Federal Autumn Conference 2025 dates and venue have been released. It will be 20-23 September 2025, at the Bournemouth International Centre (BIC), with the HQ and fringe hotel being the Highcliff Marriott Hotel.
You can book accommodation here, and conference registration will open after our Spring Conference next year.
As this will be my last Federal Conference as your President, I particularly hope to see many of you there.
Other party news
Alyssa Gilbert has joined our Federal Policy Committee (FPC) after another member resigned from the committee.
The Federal Constitution has been updated following the changes made at our Brighton Conference.
Do you have questions on any of this report, or other Lib Dem matters? Then please drop me a line on [email protected]. Do also get in touch if you would like to invite me to do a Zoom call with your local party or party body.
* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.
3 Comments
I want full on active members as much as anyone, but there is real value in having local members who are about 80% ‘armchair’ but will do a leaflet round every couple of months, especially if you have loads of them doing a bit each. It all adds up, not least because even the most strident party member generally has work, family and other life commitments that prevent them from wearing a big orange diamond hat 24/7 (well chic though it is 🔶).
Being in a local political party should also be – among other things – fun, and certainly not routinely stressful. Not everyone is able to leaflet or temperamentally built for door knocking. There’s still loads people can do if we take a horses for courses approach and properly express appreciation and gratitude.
If the LDs want to run a campaign based on being committed local candidates, it would be wise to avoid the embarrassing situation in Edinburgh, where the newly elected councillor (in a victory much heralded by Mark Pack), has now had to resign, after just one week, after it was exposed that she is in the process of moving out of the area.
Jack Nicholls – I agree with you. Where I live, having a LD on the ballot paper seems pretty pointless if there is deliberately no campaign in support – not even a single leaflet! A perfect way to wreck our credibility.
Between elections we members are ignored whilst all the focus is on an adjoining constituency. I appreciate that there need to be priorities, but not to ensure a wider active involvement of people who share the same District Council is both stupid and selfish.
It’s not fun! I couldn’t possibly encourage anyone in this area to join the party.