Michael Moore MP’s Westminster Notes – Meeting the First Minister

Liberal Democrat Secretary of State for Scotland Michael Moore MP writes a regular column for local newspapers in his constituency. Here’s the most recent edition.

Meeting with First Minister

After a short illness-related delay I met the First Minister this week to discuss the Scottish Government’s independence referendum. I am absolutely committed to working with Mr Salmond to agree on the terms of the referendum and this meeting was the first part of this process.

On this most important of questions where all of us living in Scotland will decide the future of our country, it is vitally important that the referendum is legal, fair and decisive. At the moment, the Scottish Government does not have the power to hold a legal referendum and we discussed this during the meeting. The UK Government has proposed devolving this power to the Scottish Government and I am pleased that the First Minister agreed that officials will now look at the option of using a ‘Section 30’ order, approved by the UK and Scottish Parliaments, to put the referendum on a proper legal footing. I was also pleased that the Mr Salmond agreed with the use of the Electoral Commission to oversee the referendum.

There were other important issues we discussed such as the timing of the referendum, the need for a single question on the ballot paper and the franchise. On these issues, disagreement remains, but I’m sure that as we continue to work together and reflect on the responses from the UK and Scottish Government consultations, we will be able to reach an outcome. There is however some way to travel before we get to this point.

I am still not convinced that the people of Scotland should have to wait nearly three years to have their say on independence. It is a long time until autumn 2014 and I have not yet heard a compelling reason why we should wait so long. I also believe that an independence referendum should be a straight question on independence. Scotland’s future inside or outside the United Kingdom is the issue we are dealing with. I want all of us in Scotland to be asked a straight question, fairly and clearly on whether Scotland should be independent or remain part of the UK.

The UK Government is also not persuaded that we should start changing the referendum rules to allow 16 and 17 year olds to vote. Our view is that the electorate that elected the Scottish Parliament should be the same one that votes in the referendum.  Extending the franchise to 16 and 17 year olds is another issue which needs to be discussed separately, and if agreed, applied to all elections

It is in everyone’s interests that both of Scotland’s governments work together to agree a referendum that is legal, fair and decisive. This meeting was the first of many and it was certainly a productive beginning.

Rural Development Group

Here in the Borders, the rural economy is our lifeblood: from farming to fishing, food processing to tourism, so it was great to meet up with a group taking part in the Scottish Enterprise Rural Leadership Programme last week.

During our time together we discussed a wide range of issues, from my work as Borders MP and Secretary of State for Scotland, through to rural issues and questions regarding the Independence referendum. The Rural Leadership Programme does excellent work in developing the interests and skills of enterprising people in rural communities. It was therefore very encouraging to see so many people taking part in the Programme including one of our own Berwickshire farmers.

* Michael Moore was the Liberal Democrat MP for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk from 1997-2015 and Secretary of State for Scotland from 2010-2013.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Cadan ap Tomos 22nd Feb '12 - 10:30am

    “The UK Government is also not persuaded that we should start changing the referendum rules to allow 16 and 17 year olds to vote. Our view is that the electorate that elected the Scottish Parliament should be the same one that votes in the referendum. Extending the franchise to 16 and 17 year olds is another issue which needs to be discussed separately, and if agreed, applied to all elections.”

    I completely agree with this viewpoint. As a 17 year old myself I of course believe in votes at 16, but it makes no sense to change the rules for just one poll. What worries me is that campaigns such as the Votes at 16 Coalition (of which I’m also a member) will use this against us, saying that we are anti-lowering the voting age. Why doesn’t Salmond use the powers his parliament has to lower the voting age in local and regional elections, if he’s that bothered?

    Speaking of which, why are we as a party not pushing this more? I note that Tim Farron has been very active on this, asking a question in it in DMPQs, but it’d be nice to see more being done…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Suzanne Fletcher
    Maybe I have missed something but I can't see anything about Starmers "Island of Strangers" speech? I haven't come across anyone not angry/upset about this. O...
  • Greg Hyde
    "That wasn’t what voters who came together to drive the Conservatives out of government were voting for".....Let's be honest Mark in relation to immigration, ...
  • David Raw
    On the subject of British politicians and racial prejudice, I remember from my very young days the treatment of Seretse Khama by both the Attlee government and ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Mick Taylor, "Liberals were the only people to oppose changes to immigration based on race..." ?? That's not actually true. Nearly all grou...
  • Mick Taylor
    I was making three points. 1. When Labour have a choice on immigration, they make the wrong, often racist one and the one which makes no economic sense. 2. Li...