Move to individual electoral registration speeded up

In a statement to Parliament yesterday, Mark Harper (Minister for Constitutional Reform) announced that the Government will speed up the introduction of individual electoral registration by axing Labour’s plans for an interim phase of voluntary individual registration. Instead, individual electoral registration will be introduced in 2014.

The principle of switching to individual registration has been supported by all the main parties. I previously wrote about the reasons for this support for individual electoral registration:

The current electoral registration system is based on one registration form being delivered to each household, with the head of the household completing the form on behalf of everyone there and sending it back (“household registration”).

One reason therefore for switching to individual registration is a point of principle: someone’s ability (if they aren’t the head of a household) to vote shouldn’t be dependent on whether or not someone else has filled in a form for them.

This switch will also reduce the problems with rented property, where in urban areas particularly it is far from rare for electoral registration forms to be filled in with the name of the landlord (only), resulting in those living in a property not being registered and someone who really lives elsewhere being put on the register at that address.

Individual registration will also allow the recording of “personal identifiers” such as signatures. This will in turn make it possible to tackle the risks of impersonation at polling stations. At the moment, there is relatively little protection against “impersonation” – turning up at a polling station, claiming to be someone else and getting to vote in their name.

As anti-fraud measures for postal and proxy voting have improved (largely due to the collection of personal identifiers from those applying for such votes), there’s a risk that without action fraudsters will switch to using impersonation instead. Requiring voters to supply their identifiers, and checking them against the ones given when they registered, would make such impersonation much harder.

Electoral register formThe case for a period of voluntary individual registration was never very convincing. Courtesy of the information required these days for postal votes, councils have already had the chance to learn about storing securely and using properly extra personal information on some voters.

A voluntary period would also have delayed the anti-fraud benefits of individual registration and introduced potential confusion about what was or was not required during that period. That would have required time and effort to be spent on explaining an interim stage which is far better concentrated on making the new system work, as Mark Harper argued:

We will drop the previous Government’s plans for a voluntary phase, which would have cost about £74m over the Parliament. I believe that there is a far more cost effective way to familiarise people with the new requirements for registration and avoid any temporary drop in registration rates.

The Government is sensibly introducing one transitionary arrangement to ensure that any teething issues do not materially affect the next general election:

We propose that individual registration will be made compulsory in 2014, but no-one will be removed from the electoral register who fails to register individually until after the 2015 General Election, giving people at least 12 months to comply with the new  requirements of individual registration, and ensuring as complete a register as possible for the election.

From 2014 onwards any new registrations will need to be carried out under the new system– including last minute registrations. We will also make individual registration a requirement for anyone wishing to cast a postal or proxy vote.

This will tackle immediately the main areas of concern around electoral fraud. But it will ensure that people already on the register can vote at the next election and will have more than one opportunity to register individually.

Finally, a trial of data matching to improve the electoral register was announced:

We will be trialling data matching during 2011 – that is comparing the electoral register with other public databases to find the people missing from the register. The aim is to tackle under registration among specific groups in our society and ensure that every opportunity is available to those currently not on the electoral register.

This will enable us to see how effective data matching is and to see which data sets are of most use in improving the accuracy and completeness of the electoral register. If it is effective, we will roll it out more widely across local authorities on a permanent basis.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.


  • The only problem I can see here is that some people like my other half are too lazy to bother, and would keep forgetting to fill in the online form if I didn’t do it for them.

    But all in all a commendable move, not that it will shut up Labour complaining about something they utterly failed at during their time in power.

  • Tony Greaves 16th Sep '10 - 4:23pm

    This seems to be good news all round. I am glad that from 2014 individual registration will be needed for anyone with a postal vote.

    Tony Greaves

  • Nigel Paddon 17th Sep '11 - 5:45pm

    Is there no way to tie identity in with the National Insurance number as per Inland Revenue, Benefits offices, etc? I believe that all UK citizens have one of these, and hence those in the blackmarket will be excluding themselves, by hiding or being hidden.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Becket 20th Jan - 10:22pm
    3 posts looking at Gender Balance, 3 Posts looking at Racial Diversity. As others have said nothing outward looking, nothing on major issues like climate...
  • User AvatarHywel 20th Jan - 9:59pm
    For most of the time I was a party member some wing or another was saying that just around the corner was some split in...
  • User AvatarJeff 20th Jan - 9:48pm
    Andrew 20th Jan '20 - 9:05pm: I was assuming membership of the EU or at least the customs union and single market in my original...
  • User AvatarTonyH 20th Jan - 9:41pm
    I'm totally with John and Ian on this. I too have served my time on party committees over the years, often discussing these kind of...
  • User AvatarDavid Warren 20th Jan - 9:23pm
    @PaulBarker Thank you for understanding the context that the S word was used in the article. In my time in the Labour and trade union...
  • User AvatarJeff 20th Jan - 9:18pm
    Peter Martin 20th Jan '20 - 6:04pm: They have saddled the rest of the eurozone with a strict set of rules on what governments can...