The UK Youth Parliament will be allowed to hold a meeting in the House of Commons following overwhelming approval from MPs – after a two-hour long debate. The BBC reports:
The move, which was resisted by a handful of Conservative MPs, will see the chamber being used by non-elected parliamentarians for the first time. Opponents said the Commons would abandon its traditions by agreeing, and set a precedent for other groups.
The Youth Parliament, whose 500 members are aged between 11 and 18, is expected to convene over the summer recess. This summer’s meeting will be a one-off event after the Youth Parliament held a gathering in the House of Lords last year. A vote to allow the move was backed by a majority of 189 with 16 MPs opposing it.
The motion put was:
That this House welcomes the work of the United Kingdom Youth Parliament in providing young people with an opportunity to engage with the political process and bring about social change; notes that many hon. Members from all parts of the House are actively involved in the work of the UK Youth Parliament; and accordingly resolves that the UK Youth Parliament should be allowed for this year alone to hold its 2009 annual meeting in the Chamber of this House.
Of the 16 MPs who voted against the proposal, two were Lib Dems:
Bacon, Mr. Richard
Binley, Mr. Brian
Brady, Mr. Graham
Browne, Mr. Jeremy
Burgon, Colin
Campbell, Mr. Gregory
Davies, David T.C. (Monmouth)
Davies, Philip
Davis, rh David
Heathcoat-Amory, rh Mr. David
Hollobone, Mr. Philip
McAvoy, rh Mr. Thomas
Russell, Bob
Swire, Mr. Hugo
Viggers, Sir Peter
Whittingdale, Mr. John
Wilson, Mr. Rob
Tellers for the Noes:
Mr. Peter Bone and
Mr. Christopher Chope
12 Comments
Seems a little unkind of Jeremy given he’s barely out of short-trousers himself.
Note also, all men. I know there are more men in Parliment then women but still very interesting.
This is fantastic news and I am very excited that the UK Youth Parliament will be making history.
Sam Ellis
Chair of the Board of Trustees
UK Youth Parliament
Frankly a ridiculous and pompous stance by those who opposed it. Glad to see that the overwhelming majority of MPs saw sense and supported the proposal.
I’d have thought it quite reasonable that non-elected groups shouldn’t be allowed to pose as a parliament in the chamber.
Should we let other groups in, such as those purporting to represent the elderly? I suppose one difference is that most 11-18 year olds are not permitted to stand for election, whereas the elderly (and almost all other groups) can. In which case maybe we should scrap that rule, and also allow votes at 16. Personally I’d allow votes at 11, and if the proponents of this move argue it will engage such people in politics, then why not grant them votes?
The Youth Parliament *IS* an elected body.
… but one that is far less accountable than its older sister and that isn’t heard of in some areas outside of its January election cycle. Which I only ever heard about twice before I become inelgible after this year’s. In many ways it does a lot of good work; in other ways it’s a shambles, and to give it the legitimacy of sitting in the Commons without some attempt at reforming it is a mistake. Probably. I can imagine Bob’s objection ran along those lines.
The Youth Parliament *IS* an elected body.
Ah yes, so it is! Ignore everything I’ve said (in this thread, at least).
Anyone actually know why Jeremy and Bob voted the way they did?
I’m with the nay-sayers, but for a completely different reason. The old HoC layout is deliberately confrontational and encourages schoolyard politics.
They’d be better off in Westminster Hall.
I emailed Jeremy’s office this morning to ask. Will post when I hear.
Peter Bone should not be allowed to wear a tie in the Commons. He had a garish green thing with the letters GO emblazoned on it which he gave to David Cameron at Prime Minister’s Question Time. Perhaps Mrs Bone could advise?