I guess Nadine Dorries didn’t really notice the bill she repeatedly voted on

On her blog the Conservative MP Nadine Dorries recently wrote,

For those who may not know – you become a ‘prospective candidate’ from the moment of selection until the legal election period begins which is when you transfer to being a candidate. You cannot be a candidate from selection because if you do call yourself such, the period of time you incurr election expenses kick in. Parliamentary candidates are Prospective Parliamentary Candidates, PPCs from selection until the election is called and then become Parliamentary Candidate from that time for the period of the short campaign. I imagine the same law applies to local candidates.

Oh dear.

The short response to all that is – she’s got the law wrong.

The ironic response is to point out that she’s one decade and two major changes of election law on expenses behind the times, the second of which was the Political Parties and Elections Act 2009. You’d have thought she would have noticed the second Act at least, because not only did she vote multiple times on it as it passed through Parliament, she was even a Teller in three divisions on it.

In other recent blogging news from her, there may soon be an answer to the mystery of her apparently massively exagerated website traffic figures, which she and her office have declined to answer my queries on. For she also recently blogged:


I don’t understand them. Will have them translated tomorrow. I don’t get what page views means if my blog is just a rolling page. It’s not like you click from one to the other? Anyway, it’s a lot!!

What was it Noel Coward said?

Somehow I suspect she wasn’t thinking of his comment, “I love criticism just so long as it’s unqualified praise”.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • David Boothroyd 27th Oct '10 - 11:17am

    For the recent election the law made nothing of the previous distinction between ‘prospective candidate’ and ‘candidate’. Any local campaign spending from 1 January 2010 to 11 April 2010 (the day the general election campaign formally began) was deemed part of the ‘long campaign’ and restricted to £25,000 + 5p per elector (borough) or 7p per elector (county).

  • never mind – she will claim that the post was 70% fiction as she is wrong

    for some time now calling yourself candidate hasn’t triggered election expenses before the start of the election period.

  • The Honourable Member for Mid Bedfordshire would do well to take more of an interest in matters to electoral law. There could be By-Election in the offing much sooner than she would care to imagine. How’s the expenses claims going Nadine? Are they 70% bogus?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User Avatarexpats 26th Feb - 10:07am
    TCO 26th Feb '20 - 8:[email protected] you’re completely missing the point (which is unsurprising, as you are a self-declared unreconstructed top-down socialist).......That’s not what people...
  • User AvatarJohn Hall 26th Feb - 9:48am
    Given the Party's supposed belief in Universal Human Rights as set out in the Preamble to our Constitution - rights which were enshrined in International...
  • User AvatarNeil Fawcett 26th Feb - 9:38am
    This is a very important point. IMHO several of our key strategic errors over many years have been due to decisions being made on a...
  • User AvatarJohn Barrett 26th Feb - 9:20am
    Building more houses is neither a unique selling point (as previous contributors have already mentioned - it is the policy of all major parties) and...
  • User Avatarnvelope2003 26th Feb - 9:14am
    The grammar school educated people probably got into higher managerial positions in the 1970s replacing the ineffective public school educated people in many cases but...
  • User AvatarTony Harris 26th Feb - 9:12am
    The are lots of arguments both for and against ID cards. I’m somewhere in the middle primarily because of the homeless and low income arguments....