Nick (finally) makes his education speech and launches the Coalition’s own ‘Champions League’

Five days after it was pre-briefed, Nick Clegg finally made his speech on A Liberal Vision for Education at Morpeth School in Tower Hamlets.

(Morpeth is, by the way, a fantastic school. I visited it for my day-job 18 months ago, and was shown around by two of its pupils, Vanessa and Mahir: the transformational progress of London schools in the past decade is one of the modern wonders of Britain.)

There was little in the speech we didn’t already know. In fact, there was little that wasn’t known last March when Clegg’s “surprise U-turn on free schools” (© all lazy journos) was – as I’ve already blogged – approved as party policy by the Lib Dems’ spring conference.

The party is in favour of school autonomy but with three guaranteed minimum standards: all teachers should have, or be working towards, recognised teaching qualifications; all schools should follow a stripped-back national curriculum; and all schools should follow agreed food quality standards.

This very intentionally positions the Lib Dems in the centre between Labour, which has a tendency to want to interfere in everything, and the Tories, who are very happy having no core standards at all. As The Times notes today, it’s an approach which has widespread public support:

Nick Clegg receives public backing for his moves to tighten regulation of free schools, which he will outline in a speech today in East London. Some 66 per cent agree that schools should only be allowed to employ people with formal teaching qualifications, while 56 per cent say that the national curriculum should be compulsory for all schools.

Personally, I’m still not keen on politicians telling schools what they can and cannot do. But Nick Clegg’s position is squarely in line with approved party policy. It is also very close to Labour’s policy as recently re-emphasised by new shadow education secretary Tristram Hunt.

The one new proposal was the so-called ‘Champions League of Head Teachers’, a truly awful appellation — though not as bad as the ones that were rejected, according to the Mail’s James Chapman – for a decent idea. This will aim to match schools facing tough challenges with ‘high-performing head teachers or exceptional deputy heads ready to take on this challenge’. (You can read more here.)

This announcement has been welcomed by the Association of School and College Leaders: “We are delighted that our work with the government on how to attract the best school leaders into schools and areas where they are needed most has borne fruit in this announcement today.”

We need to see the details, of course. The key question the proposal needs to address is why would a head-teacher (even one fully committed to the ideals of teaching) who’s doing well at their own school uproot themselves and their family to take on a school in need of improvement and with real pressure to turn results around fast?

Head-teachers are increasingly being treated like football managers: one dodgy season and they’re out. This has happened twice already this term (to my knowledge), at academy schools in Wellington and at Gloucester. Results matter, of course: kids’ later lives depend on them. But they can fluctuate year to year for reasons out of the head-teacher’s control. And while leadership is crucial, that doesn’t start and end with the head: they will need an effective team, too.

Those caveats aside, though, this is a positive proposal. But, please, let’s quietly ditch the ‘Champions League’ moniker.

PS: it’s well worth reading ‘Nick Clegg’s Alternative Speech’ as written by Policy Exchange’s head of education, Jonathan Simons. Here’s how it concludes:

… next time someone says to you that the Liberal Democrats can’t be trusted, or aren’t a serious party, or are just a wasted vote, just tell them. Tell them about education.”

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Eddie Sammon 24th Oct '13 - 11:59pm

    You can’t take the success of a school’s pupils, teachers and other staff and try to give all the credit to the headteacher. However I support presenting our education policy as balanced.

  • Paul Pettinger 25th Oct '13 - 11:58pm

    Further to an earlier thread, this is precisely the kind of coverage I was fearing:

    Great job from your man again – this was a set piece speech. I don’t usually agree with Toby Young:
    “Not so much a U-turn, then, as weaving all over the highway. Without a map. I’ve got a novel idea for you, Cleggers. If you know bugger all about a subject, why not keep your trap shut in future?”

  • Richard Dean 27th Oct '13 - 4:52am

    I recommend the book

    “I am Malala, The Girl Who Stood Up for Education and as Shot by the Taliban”, by Malala Yousafzai

    It’s a great read, and it really puts the value of education and the issues surrounding it into perspective.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ SimonR, There some other advantages. Such as: you can't be sacked if you own your own business! You can put your partner and children on the payroll even i...
  • Andy Daer
    Tom, thanks for this excellent summary. Steve, it was hubris that led that "London adult" to think his hurt was so important - he was on the radio shortly afte...
  • Simon R
    @Katharine: 3 year default tenancy and no evictions other than for breaking the contract? Umm... how does that work if - say - for some reason, I have to move a...
  • Simon R
    @Peter Martin: Yes you're correct that, if you run a small business, taking your income as dividend will typically mean paying less tax than if you take it as a...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Thanks for the support on the share buybacks proposed policy, Peter Martin. Just now I want to add a few facts about what we want to offer young people on housi...