From today’s Scotland on Sunday:
THE businessman at the centre of the Wendy Alexander donation scandal was backed for an honour by senior figures in the Labour Party, it emerged last night.
MSP Charlie Gordon, who resigned last week as Labour’s transport spokesman after it emerged he arranged an illegal donation from Jersey tycoon Paul Green, has now admitted he earlier supported the same businessman for an unspecified honour.
Oops. There’s more in the full story.
Meanwhile, the Sunday Herald (who have been leading the way in investigating the Wendy Alexander donation story) reports evidence that questions over Paul Green’s donations were covered-up:
Alexander’s team is facing damaging charges that its members knew her campaign donation from tax exile Paul Green was suspect three weeks ago. According to her secret list of donors, of which the Sunday Herald has a hard copy, Green’s cash was flagged up as being questionable as early as November 5. The document was created on a computer registered to “Brian Ashcroft”, Alexander’s husband.
This contradicts the claim made by Tom McCabe – Alexander’s campaign manager – that she was made aware of a personal, rather than corporate, donation from Green last Thursday…
The Sunday Herald has obtained a printed copy of Alexander’s full list of secret donors, which names each contributor, how much was given, as well as the campaign member from whom it was solicited.
According to the “properties” tab in the Microsoft Word document, “Brian Ashcroft”, Alexander’s husband, is named as the “author”. This means the document was created on a computer registered in his name.
There is a key leap in the evidence there – from assuming that what was done using a version of Word registered in the name of “Brian Ashcroft” would have been known about by Wendy Alexander (husbands and wives don’t tell each other everything, and anyway, I bet that a noticeable proportion of people reading this posting are using a version of Word that is registered under someone else’s name).
The full Herald story does though have further evidence of murking goings on. And – just as with the English angle on the donations story – the initial firm denials about senior politicians knowing anything was wrong are unravelling.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Like Trump, Farage cannot understand democracy
Steeleye Span with Peter Sellers: New York Girls
Labour government needs to give universities a break
Judy Abel
John Hann
Peter Martin
Peter Chambers
3 Comments
How come this blog is willing to mention a story that your party’s MSPs are not? Are the MSP group that determined to stay close buddies with the Labour MSPs even through a scandal?
As a Scottish LibDem member I have become increasingly disillusioned since May by my party giving the impression of almost constant support for Labour.
With these current scandals the MSPs have led us up a path that will ensure we are damaged in the electoral explosion unless we start creating some equidistance between ourselves and Labour in the Scottosh Parliament.
We used to do well by taking a stance that was critical or supportive where needed between the other parties. Now we are just sounding like Labour’s echo with no clear policies being promoted.
I felt I was in the minority 6 months ago but more and more fellow members are beginning to question the direction we are being taken in by the MSPs who seem tied in with Labour.
I reckon this may be the issue where pressure is brought to bear on the MSPs to get a grip. Our poll ratings in Scotland are ridiculously low compared to where we were in a General Election only two and half a years ago.
Equidistance must return.
Earlier? Usually CWO or COD to be sordid? Whole honours system is whack. And funding. But … grown ups recognise that successful people are actually quite likely to be rich enough to donate and er successful enough to get honours or be useful to govt even. System is whack.