PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on Labour’s ‘surveillance state’

After this week’s controversy about bugging of MPs, Nick Clegg used his two questions to the Prime Minister to ask directly about Labour’s desperate efforts to keep tabs on every man, woman and child in the country. In particular, Nick focused on the fingerprinting of children at school, and demanded the Prime Minister stop the practise – a question Mr Brown preferred to ignore.

Meanwhile, the Tory leader’s PMQs’ increasingly shrill performance has become the focus this week of some criticism from the BBC’s Nick Robinson:

The leader who promised an end to ‘Punch and Judy’ has become more and more contemptuous in his attitude to the PM and, as a result, less respectful towards the office itself. … I recall David Cameron telling Tories to be aware that whatever they said would, in the end, tell voters as much about them as the person they were attacking. Has he forgotten this or am I missing something?

There’s no doubting that Mr Cameron is quick on his feet, and well able to riposte with a barbed insult. Yet this poison-tongued smoothness – combined with some glib questions and the full-throated braying of the Tory ranks – can produce a fairly unedifying spectacle which does nothing to make Dave look Prime Ministerial. His advisors would do well to steer him away from lines like today’s rather pathetic playground crack, “I think the Prime Minister had been practising that soundbite all week, and do you know what? It is still rubbish.”

Anyway, read for yourself below how Nick got on this week:

Mr. Nick Clegg (Sheffield, Hallam) (LD): This week’s bugging controversy should not come as a surprise to the Prime Minister. After all, it is this Government who have turned the British public into the most spied upon on the planet: 1,000 surveillance requests every day; 1 million innocent people on the Government’s DNA database; and 5,000 schools now fingerprinting our children at school. Is that what the Prime Minister meant when he spoke so stirringly a few months ago about the great British tradition of liberty?

The Prime Minister: I take it that the right hon. Gentleman and the Liberal authorities support CCTV. I take it that they support the intercept action that is taken when it is necessary for national security. I take it that he accepts that only 1,500 intercepts have been commissioned by Ministers as a result of urgent security needs. Does he accept these things or not?

Mr. Clegg: The Prime Minister seems to see no limits. He is creating a surveillance state. Why has he consistently refused requests for more power to be given to the Information Commissioner? Why does he not do what is already done in Scotland and remove the DNA of innocent people from the database? Why will he not act immediately to stop the scandalous fingerprinting of our children at school?

The Prime Minister: People in this country are reassured by the presence of CCTV; I hope that the right hon. Gentleman is not proposing to remove it. That is one very important part of the investigatory and surveillance powers that we give the police to carry out their work. I would hope that the right hon. Gentleman would look at the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and see the protections that have been put in place where there is surveillance and where there are intercepts. They include authorisation by a senior officer, the right to appeal to an independent tribunal, and a commissioner for surveillance who looks at matters and reports annually. We are taking the steps to protect the liberties of the citizens; I hope that the right hon. Gentleman will support that.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News and PMQs.
Advert

4 Comments

  • The UK should have a royal commission on CCTV. It’s out of control, ‘reassuring’ or not.

  • Terry Gilbert 7th Feb '08 - 5:48pm

    When thieves dropped into the secure bike parking area from an adjacent roof near my London flat a few years back and stole my wife’s new bike, the police took the apparantly good CCTV images of them from the caretaker, and we never heard anything more from them again.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Walter 13th Dec - 2:49am
    So far we re +3 points on votes. Tories are +2%. Labour -9%. Obviously results so far are not entirely indicative because the mix of...
  • User AvatarHywel 13th Dec - 2:48am
    Labour hold Canterbury. Not much sign of massive tactical voting
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 13th Dec - 2:44am
    Peter Watson - On Hallam being affluent.I grew up in Sheffield and have done a lot of political campaigning there since. When we were both...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 13th Dec - 2:44am
    +3% on our vote so far Zac Goldsmith has gone with a 8000 majority for us! In other news, Nigel Dodds has gone. Most distressing.
  • User AvatarCharles Anglin 13th Dec - 2:37am
    Tim Farron holds on
  • User AvatarRafi 13th Dec - 2:29am
    We're looking at a Tory majority... disaster is an understatement. Lib Dem campaign was not the best but not as bad as some comments have...
Tue 7th Jan 2020