Pollwatch Day 20 #GE2010 – Lib Dems back at 30%

Just one poll published tonight (so far at any rate):

    YouGov in the Sun … CON 34%(-1), LAB 28%(+1), LIB DEM 30%(+2)

So much for the charge – led by its sister-paper – that the Lib Dem bubble had burst. The poll suggests the party is continuing to hover at the 30% mark, and continuing to push Labour into third place.

There was incidentally one other poll published we omitted to report last night: BPIX (the firm which refuses to comply with polling industry standards) showed CON 34%(+3), LAB 26%(-2), LIB DEM 30%(-2).

It does seems as if the party is heading into the final full week of the election campaign in its healthiest poll position in modern history. Interestingly, it’s usually in the final 10 days of the campaign that the Lib Dems begin to put on a few points in the polls. Now the TV debate and ‘Cleggmania’ may mean that’s already been priced in to the polls. We shall see. Anthony Wells’ UK Polling Report ‘poll of polls’ continues to show:

    CON 34%, LAB 27%, LIB DEM 29%

Mori’s Bob Worcester has an interesting article in today’s Observer looking at where the new Lib Dem voters have come from based on his firm’s polling in Labour-Tory battleground marginals. Here are the findings:

In these battleground seats, quite a lot more from women (+16%) than men (+9%), more from middle-class voters (+15%) than working-class (+9%), and more from the young, 18-34s (+16%), than middle-aged, 35-54 (+13%), or from older people, 55+ (+9%).

The retention rate is also a factor in the rise of the Lib Dems. From the data before the prime minister called the election and after, the Tory retention rate fell eight points, from 77% of those who recalled voting Conservative in 2005; Labour held its own and a bit more, from 52% before, and 55% this past week. The Liberal Democrats, however, bounced from a lowly 43% up 18 points to 61%.

This volcanic activity seems to be persisting; voters and now bookies signal a hung Parliament. That means Clegg, while not becoming politically king, could certainly become a kingmaker.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election and Polls.


  • Andrew Suffield 26th Apr '10 - 2:11am

    There’s quite a few more sophisticated prediction algorithms been proposed over the years; I don’t think anybody really believes UNS is very accurate. The problem is that they all rely on measuring things which the pollsters don’t measure. We stick with UNS because, in a typical UK election (which shows only a few percent movement in any direction) it’s reasonably accurate, and because it is the only thing which we can generate daily forecasts with.

    If the pollsters wanted to be really useful, what we need is large, properly weighted samples of voting intention for each constituency.

  • Anthony Aloysius St 26th Apr '10 - 11:44pm

    In the absence of Pollwatch Day 21, here are today’s polls:
    YouGov/Sun CON 33%(-1), LAB 28%(nc), LDEM 29%(-1)
    Opinium/Express CON 34%(+2), LAB 25%(-1), LDEM 28%(-1)
    ICM/Guardian CON 33%(-2), LAB 28%(+2), LDEM 30%(-1)
    ComRes/ITV/Independent CON 32%(-2), LAB 28%(nc), LDEM 31%(+2)

    It’s interesting that (if my sums are correct) the average of today’s polls is identical with Anthony Wells’s more sophisticated average of recent polls:
    Con: 33 Lab: 27 LD: 30

    And his national projection based on a uniform national swing has Labour 60+ and the Tories 70+ short of a majority, with the Lib Dems on just over 100 seats. After Peter Kellner’s analysis yesterday, there’s less reason to think that the Tories will do all that much better than that.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Nonconformistradical
    "If voter impersonation were significant there would be many cases of voters turning up to be told they had already voted. Also there would likely be many cases...
  • Andrew Tampion
    George Thomas is right to say that it is bizarre to argue that because there is no evidence of current voter fraud that is not a reason to improve the security ...
  • Mark Morris
    worth noting some specific concerns and recommendations made by RNIB: https://www.rnib.org.uk/campaigning/priority-campaigns/voting-and-elections/turned-out-20...
  • john oundle
    Matt Wardman 'This look rather scaremonger-y' Spot on,just looks very childish....
  • Martin
    In UK elections, low turn out is a bigger problem than voter impersonation. If voter impersonation were significant there would be many cases of voters turning...