Pollwatch Day 4 #GE2010 – Lib Dems at 20%, Lab 30%, Tories 38% (still)

(Actually Saturday is Day 5, so please pretend I remembered to set this live on Friday night as intended).

Three new polls today, all with positive news for the Lib Dems:

    YouGov in the Sun … CON 40%(nc), LAB 30%(-1), LIB DEM 20%(+2)
    Harris in the Daily Mail … CON 37%(nc), LAB 27%(-1), LIB DEM 22%(+2)
    Harris in Metro … CON 37%(nc), LAB 28%(+1), LIB DEM 20%(+1)

All moves are within the margin of error, so it would be rash to read too much into them. But that said, it’s notable that seven of the last 10 polls have shown the Lib Dems at 20% or higher – a good score for the first week of the campaign, and on a par with how the party was performing in 2005.

Think back a few months, and the speculation was that the Lib Dems would be badly squeezed if there were a widespread belief the election result would be close. What we seem to be seeing is that with voters unsure either Labour or the Tories have got what it takes to govern well, people are reassured the Lib Dems are in a strong position.

Anthony Wells’ UK Polling Report ‘poll of polls’ remains unchanged:

    Con 38% (n/c), Lab 30% (n/c), Lib Dem 20% (n/c)

Nick Clegg ratings

My Co-Editor Mark Pack noted yesterday the BBC’s Nick Robinson’s error in making assumptions about how the campaign is being judged based not on what the public thinks, but how the Westminster Village sees it. There’s further polling evidence for that in an Angus Reid survey which has (surprise, surprise) been largely ignored by the media as it doesn’t fit their two-party narrative.

Both Nick Clegg and David Cameron have job approval ratings of 45% – though Mr Cameron is considerably more unpopular: 42% disapprove of Dave’s performance (a net +3% approval), while only 26% disapprove of Nick’s performance (a net +19% approval). Gordon Brown’s net approval rating remains a dire -28%.

At least as interesting is the public’s perception of the first week’s campaign by the leaders, and whether their opinion of Nick, and Messrs Brown and Cameron have improved or worsened. Here’s what they found:

  • Nick Clegg: 16% of the public say their opinion of Nick has improved, 7% say it’s worsened (with the rest saying their view’s unchanged, or they’re not sure) – a net ‘momentum score’ of +9%.
  • Gordon Brown: 10% have an improved opinion of Mr Brown, 24% have a worse opinion – a net ‘momentum score’ of -14%.
  • David Cameron: 14% have an improved opinion of Mr Cameron, 20% have a worse opinion – a net ‘momentum score’ of -6%.

So if the public is to be believed (rather than the BBC’s political editor) Nick has enjoyed the best first week of the campaign by some margin. Of course, a lot of this is simply the result of the increased exposure that the media’s legally-enforced more equal treatment of the three main parties allows during the election period – at last the public is getting to hear from Nick Clegg himself, instead of just being told by the media that no-one knows who Nick Clegg is.

The marginals

There was an interesting polling analysis in Friday’s FT.com:

… it is becoming harder to use [vote shares] to predict parties’ seat shares – and it may be even harder this year because of the impact of the expenses scandal on individual constituency contests. Swing (the average of the percentage point fall in one party’s share of the vote and the percentage point rise in the other’s) still happens, but it is no longer quite so uniform. Had it been so in 2005, Labour’s majority would have been just over 100 rather than the 66 it eventually managed.

That said, claims from the Conservatives that they are doing better in marginal constituencies than elsewhere should be treated with a degree of scepticism. After all, they made the same boast in 2005, but in the end the swing in the great majority of their target seats was all but identical to the swing nationally.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in General Election and Polls.


  • Tony Greaves 10th Apr '10 - 1:09pm

    The most significant feature of most recent polls has been the weakness of Labour.

    38-30-20 adds up to 88. In my view the Others will be at least 15% which would mean these 3-party figures are not sustainable. Others will start to grow once candidates are announced and leaflets arrive and people discover they have a UKIP or whatever standing.

    If the LD figure creeps up a bit further that makes it even more difficult for Lab and Con to maintain these levels. But it’s not easy to see how they will fall much further.

    One possibility is that Labour will get a few bad really polls and will be seen to be sliding – if that becomes the election story who knows what might happen. Another is that LDs do get squeezed. Or the Tories may lose support to UKIP and the BNP and Europe becomes an election issue. But something somewhere is going to have to give.

    Tony Greaves

  • Tony Greaves may be on to something. In 1983, the Labour vote did slide during the campaign (down to an unprecedented 28%), and mainly to the SDP/Liberal Alliance, with little benefit to the latter in terms of seats. The difference this time is that the Conservatives are weaker than they were in government under Thatcher, and the Lib Dem organisation is much stronger and more focussed (yes, pun intended). So it is good news, if my analysis is right. My only worry is that enough Labour voters will switch to us in seats where we have no hope of winning to help the Tories get an overall majority (even if we gain the Eastbournes and Guildfords from them). By the way, I do live in a key Tory target, but there is no way I will vote for a party that gave us the Iraq war, child curfews, ID cards, extradition to the USA on demand, etc, no matter what the consequences.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Katharine, I'm sorry your thread was diverted on to internal issues of the Labour Party. For some strange reason Joe chose to dig up an obscure 80's SWP ar...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Joe, The BBC article doesn't get it right on Trotskyist entryism. Many people have joined the Party to promote Socialist policies which includes widespread...
  • Joseph Bourke
    Katharine, Ed Davey floated the idea of funding a universal basic income with coronavirus debt-for-shares plan last summer https://www.politicshome.com/news/...
  • Margaret
    @Paul Fisher As of July 2019 complaints and disciplinary matters have been in the hands of the new system. The English state and regional parties no longer hav...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Gentlemen, after these enjoyable excursions into the creditable history of the coalition government of the Second World War and the succeeding Attlee government...
Thu 11th Mar 2021