Postal voting: police to get tough over Code of Conduct

Police forces across England and Wales are teaming up with local councils in a welcome move to encourage agents and candidates to abide by the Postal Voting Code of Conduct. They will be sending letters to agents and candidates asking them to personally sign up to the Code of Conduct.

In previous years the Code has been a national agreement negotiated by the Electoral Commission with, on the one hand, electoral administrators and, on the other, the main political parties. The involvement of both parties and administrators means the Postal Voting Code of Conduct strikes a balance between recognising the genuine role that parties have in encouraging people to sign up and use their postal votes yet also recognising the danger of rogue individuals or campaigns threatening the fairness of the election.

As a result, for example, the Code says it is acceptable for political parties to issue postal vote application forms but also says that any forms returned to parties must be sent on to the relevant local council within two working days.

All the main parties have signed up to the national Code in previous years. However, this in effect has left out minor parties and independent candidates from its scope, whilst also providing individual agents or candidates from one of the main parties the potential excuse, regardless of how hard a party has publicised it, that “I didn’t know I was meant to follow it”.

The police initiative will, however, remove these excuses. Although abiding by the Code of Conduct on Postal Voting is voluntary, and therefore anyone may decline to sign up to it, this will leave them vulnerable to bad publicity.

Liberal Democrat HQ has confirmed that as in previous years, because the party has nationally signed up to the Code, failure to follow the code would be a breach of party rules that could result in expulsion from the party. Therefore declining to sign up in response to the police letters would also be viewed in the same light. A mailing is currently going out to candidates and agents on this matter.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law.


  • If I understand this correctly this is a very bad move for us to be backing.

    It sounds like the police will send official letters saying something like “We urge you to sign up to this code.”

    If people aren’t concerned by this applying to postal votes (where the end is one I wholly agree with) then imagine if the police responded to the issue of taking photographs in public places like this. Got a selection of photographers groups to draw up a code of acceptable conduct, and then wrote to all photographers asking them to sign up to it.

    I think most people in the party would react pretty strongly to that.

    The code of conduct restricts behaviour at election time. Whether I agree to that is a matter between me and my party. The police have no role in requiring compliance with arrangements which involve no breach of the law.

    If the law on postal votes needs tightening (and I think the answer to that is a pretty conclusive “YES”) then that is a matter for Parliament not the police and electoral commission to invent new rules.

  • I must agree I don’t understand what role the Police possibly have in an voluntary code.

  • Well if you don’t understand that, you don’t understand how elections are corrupted by the manipulation of postal votes and blatant fraud that goes in many places. Including Burnley of course.

    I just wish the police would take these things seriously, particularly when the Labour Party are rigging elections.

    Tony Greaves

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Michael KilpatrickMichael Kilpatrick
    Sorry, I wrote Harry rather than Robert! Typing whilst walking the dog.. Another point related to this was made by Iain Donaldson who was on the former Polic...
  • Michael KilpatrickMichael Kilpatrick
    Interesting point, Harry. Remember that various former French colonies are still actually part of France with representation in Parliament. I don't know, howeve...
  • Tim Rogers
    A glance at a map of Armenia shows an Azeri enclave in the south west bordering Iran. What is happening there? Could Iran send in troops if Armenia becomes too ...
  • James Fowler
    A government with 'backbone' on tax affairs might: Abolish stamp duty but introduce capital gains tax on primary properties. Merge income tax and NI. M...
  • Peter Martin
    "which implies that policy-makers did not let interest rates respond strongly to the take-off of inflation ........ the 9.3% rise in mean annual inflation...