Government afraid of technology offers to protect the public

The Government has launched a consultation on their plans to keep a record of all our “communications data” – that is, the time and recipient of each email, text message or phone call we make, the websites we visit and the place from which we do this.

Although the Government has climbed down from its plans to establish a central database of all communications data, it proposes to make communications service providers hold it instead, for a whole year. Then “public authorities” and “investigators” would be given access to it for their purposes.

The title of the consultation document itself is an irony-free piece of doublethink: “Protecting the Public in a Changing Communications Environment.” In this the author has tried to establish a false common enemy. It implies that it’s us and the Government against Technology, against Change itself. “We’ll protect you,” can then run the argument.

For all the mentions of balance in the document (7 of them, in fact) it’s hard to present a balanced choice once the frame has been set.

No wonder they want to tip the balance: the Government is worried that the pace of technological change is running away from them faster than their salami-slicing tactics of hoarding up every last piece of data about us can keep up. Methods of communication are improving and increasing so mass surveillance is getting cumbersome and expensive.

Note the use of words like “degrade” in the foreword, which make date stamps on our text messages sound like some kind of weapons-grade data plutonium in the war against the bogeyman:

“I am clear that to do nothing in the face of these developments – thus allowing the capability to use communications data to degrade – could lead to more crimes left unsolved and more cases where public authorities could not protect people from harm.”

And my favourite: Point 21 of the conclusion:

“This consultation covers an important topic that affects us all. The capability to use communications data to protect the public is being eroded by new technology. In seeking to maintain that capability, the Government must strike the right balance between public safety and privacy.”

Eroded? Not our freedom, but the Government’s ability to use information about our private lives. And this is presented as a Bad Thing.

The Home Secretary signs off with, “I look forward to hearing your views.”

Well, log this, Jacqui:

No database. You can chop it up and hide it among all the comms service providers you like, but you’re still keeping tabs on us.

Please write to your MP and object to routine Government surveillance.

Read the consultation document, answer the questions and make your own comments, then send them to:

Nigel Burrowes
Communications Data Consultation
Room P.5.37
Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
Or by e-mail to: [email protected]

UPDATE: You can also comment on the document here, via (Hat-tip: Owen Blacker)

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Big mad database and News.


  • As an aside form the main issue. Is it proposed to record details of all spam emails?
    Yes ? A big job.
    No? That’s a loop hole.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Fiona
    I'm a member of Compass, and while I continue to support the overall advertised aims of the group, I can't help but think that they only see the LibDems as a me...
  • Barry Lofty
    It is really sad to see the NHS under so much pressure and services deteriorating mainly because of the reasons given by Catherine Royce. The NHS is something t...
  • Yeovil Yokel
    An intriguing, and possibly masterful, choice for a safe rural Conservative seat. A major, eh? - Paddy was but a mere captain. You don’t want to miss this o...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might we be facing two problems at the same time, which may or maybe not significantly connected? One is increasing poverty and the other is increasing inflati...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might it be the case that the attitudes and performance of the Metropolitan Police in this matter come somewhere on a continuum/spectrum between inept and corru...