Reports to party conference: two good things

In amongst the paperwork for the Autumn 2012 Liberal Democrat Conference in Brighton is the bundle of reports from various party committees and bodies. The idea of the reports, and the ability to question them, is a great one. The content of the reports can have a tendency to be a little too banal or general to make for a meaningful report back from committees to people who elected them.

Take this shock news from the FCC report, for example:

We have a great line-up for the rally on Saturday evening. Some excellent speakers have been chosen.

Gosh.

However, even in the banality of some sections the reports do at least illuminate what sorts of decisions are being made and by who – as in this example, where at least the report means any reader is clear about who to complain to if they don’t think the rally line-up has been chosen well. Knowing how best to press a point is a huge step towards having a decent chance of success at making the point.

Two good signs in the reports do deserve welcoming.

First, in Tim Farron’s early days as Party President, the Federal Executive (FE) report shrunk hugely in length and content. To Tim’s credit, not only did he respond positively when I raised this at conference last year, but also the improvement in the FE reports has been sustained with the Autumn 2012 version.

Second, the bundle of reports now includes a report from the Federal Appeals Panel (FAP). This follows my motion – and the nail-bittingly close debate – at the last autumn conference. There are no shock revelations in the report. Yet it does what I hoped it would.

It both sheds some light on what the body does and how it does it, always good things in principle, and it also makes it easier for people to find its rulings and so cite them as precedence in any future cases. If you don’t know what precedents may be available to cite in a case, you’re always going to be at a disadvantage in arguing your corner as effectively as possible. Now people can accumulate FAP reports and start losing that disadvantage.

* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and Party policy and internal matters.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Evans
    Let's be honest here. The whole thing is a political carve up, by an instinctively centralising and authoritarian Labour party, emboldened by a huge parliament...
  • George Thomas
    Perhaps my most illiberal "opinion" is that automatic freedom of movement for immigrants is possibly a bad thing*. I remember speaking with a recent refugee who...
  • Chloe
    'underlying emotions are fear, resentment and inadequacy relating to their own lives' Are you saying the residents of Crowborough or Bicester who've protested ...
  • Andy Daer
    We're talking about two different things here. The reasons our potential workforce doesn't fit with what the economy and society require are one thing, and the ...
  • David Raw
    Nigel Lindsay raises some substantial questions about local democracy and accountability. I hope the parliamentary party will take the matter up as a matter of ...