Reports to party conference: two good things

In amongst the paperwork for the Autumn 2012 Liberal Democrat Conference in Brighton is the bundle of reports from various party committees and bodies. The idea of the reports, and the ability to question them, is a great one. The content of the reports can have a tendency to be a little too banal or general to make for a meaningful report back from committees to people who elected them.

Take this shock news from the FCC report, for example:

We have a great line-up for the rally on Saturday evening. Some excellent speakers have been chosen.

Gosh.

However, even in the banality of some sections the reports do at least illuminate what sorts of decisions are being made and by who – as in this example, where at least the report means any reader is clear about who to complain to if they don’t think the rally line-up has been chosen well. Knowing how best to press a point is a huge step towards having a decent chance of success at making the point.

Two good signs in the reports do deserve welcoming.

First, in Tim Farron’s early days as Party President, the Federal Executive (FE) report shrunk hugely in length and content. To Tim’s credit, not only did he respond positively when I raised this at conference last year, but also the improvement in the FE reports has been sustained with the Autumn 2012 version.

Second, the bundle of reports now includes a report from the Federal Appeals Panel (FAP). This follows my motion – and the nail-bittingly close debate – at the last autumn conference. There are no shock revelations in the report. Yet it does what I hoped it would.

It both sheds some light on what the body does and how it does it, always good things in principle, and it also makes it easier for people to find its rulings and so cite them as precedence in any future cases. If you don’t know what precedents may be available to cite in a case, you’re always going to be at a disadvantage in arguing your corner as effectively as possible. Now people can accumulate FAP reports and start losing that disadvantage.

* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and Party policy and internal matters.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mohammed Amin
    I fail to understand the basis for Samuel Jackson's objections. He clearly believes in local democracy. Calderdale Council is the elected body with responsib...
  • John Marriott
    Yes, I have to agree that some people in Israel and on the US evangelical right appear to be getting what they want. Sadly, in their opposition to the creation ...
  • Cllr Donna Harris
    Huge congratulations, Roderick, on all your efforts, success and for working cross-party on this important issue! As Leader of the Opposition in Lambeth, we ...
  • John Marriott
    @Samuel Jackson They missed a trick there then. Where are the barricades?!...
  • Samuel James Jackson
    Hi John Marriot, I would like to clarify that proposals for the Sowerby Bridge incinerator does not include plans for electricity generation....