Tag Archives: graham allen

The Independent View: Slashing early years spending contradicts the desire to improve social mobility

By Chris Paterson | Thu 3rd November 2011 - 1:45 pm

In its Social Mobility strategy launched last April, the government made clear the dual priorities shaping its agenda:

“Tackling the financial deficit is the Coalition’s most immediate task. But tackling the opportunity deficit – creating an open, socially mobile society – is our guiding purpose.”

These are strong words indeed, marking an unequivocal commitment to improving the life chances of children from disadvantaged backgrounds. At a very minimum, they indicate a clear intention to manage the necessary public spending cuts in a way that recognises this laudable goal.

Continue reading »
Posted in The Independent View | Also tagged , , , , and | 4 Comments
Alex Feakes

Opinion: Early years intervention is a smart move

By Alex Feakes | Wed 19th January 2011 - 3:44 pm

It’s unusual for my morning radio alarm to bring me to wakefulness quite so abruptly as it did today with the coverage of MP Graham Allen’s report on giving disadvantaged children the best start in life. Something so important being given leading coverage is good news.

Although it probably isn’t news to most working the sector, nor many Liberal Democrats I suspect, it is very welcome that high-profile, cross party attention is now being given to idea that early intervention to improve social and emotional development will yield great dividends for
the child and society later in its life.

The report …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 15 Comments
Mark Pack

Fixed-term Parliaments: better by standing orders?

By Mark Pack | Tue 14th September 2010 - 10:26 am

Last week Malcolm Jack, the Clerk of the House of Commons, got a little flurry of media coverage for his evidence before a Parliamentary committee considering the proposed legislation for fixed-term Parliaments. “Parts of the government’s plans to bring in fixed-term parliaments are vulnerable to legal challenge” was how the BBC reported it.

It is understandable why that got the headlines, but lurking in the detail are important questions about how Parliament operates and whether its administration is competent. Jack’s evidence, and concerns about the legislation, really fall into three parts.

First, as might be expected from an official whose …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds and Parliament | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Steve Trevethan
    Thank you for a really relevant article! "Roughly 23% to 35% of average customer water bills in England and Wales is used to pay interest on corporate debt a...
  • David Allen
    The senior partner in a coalition can usually completely screw the junior partner, as Cameron did to Clegg. So, why should a senior partner agree to any toughe...
  • expats
    For those unconditionally praising the 'Blue Tsunami' let's hope that the new lot are more effective than the current crop... Republican Congressman Thomas Mas...
  • expats
    An Israeli airstrike on Nasser hospital in southern Gaza killed six people, including a surgeon and a disabled man, and wounded 28 others, according to the hosp...
  • Peter Martin
    " You can’t have one rule for things you like and another for things you don’t like." ??? You've only got to attend a football match to know t...