Tag Archives: graham allen

The Independent View: Slashing early years spending contradicts the desire to improve social mobility

By Chris Paterson | Thu 3rd November 2011 - 1:45 pm

In its Social Mobility strategy launched last April, the government made clear the dual priorities shaping its agenda:

“Tackling the financial deficit is the Coalition’s most immediate task. But tackling the opportunity deficit – creating an open, socially mobile society – is our guiding purpose.”

These are strong words indeed, marking an unequivocal commitment to improving the life chances of children from disadvantaged backgrounds. At a very minimum, they indicate a clear intention to manage the necessary public spending cuts in a way that recognises this laudable goal.

Continue reading »
Posted in The Independent View | Also tagged , , , , and | 4 Comments
Alex Feakes

Opinion: Early years intervention is a smart move

By Alex Feakes | Wed 19th January 2011 - 3:44 pm

It’s unusual for my morning radio alarm to bring me to wakefulness quite so abruptly as it did today with the coverage of MP Graham Allen’s report on giving disadvantaged children the best start in life. Something so important being given leading coverage is good news.

Although it probably isn’t news to most working the sector, nor many Liberal Democrats I suspect, it is very welcome that high-profile, cross party attention is now being given to idea that early intervention to improve social and emotional development will yield great dividends for
the child and society later in its life.

The report …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 15 Comments
Mark Pack

Fixed-term Parliaments: better by standing orders?

By Mark Pack | Tue 14th September 2010 - 10:26 am

Last week Malcolm Jack, the Clerk of the House of Commons, got a little flurry of media coverage for his evidence before a Parliamentary committee considering the proposed legislation for fixed-term Parliaments. “Parts of the government’s plans to bring in fixed-term parliaments are vulnerable to legal challenge” was how the BBC reported it.

It is understandable why that got the headlines, but lurking in the detail are important questions about how Parliament operates and whether its administration is competent. Jack’s evidence, and concerns about the legislation, really fall into three parts.

First, as might be expected from an official whose …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds and Parliament | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mick Taylor
    @PM LDV word limits do not always make it possible to say everything one might like! Yes, some people, myself included, have been able to make other provision...
  • Peter Davies
    @Jana "Can I ask how you believe getting a mortgage and then paying it off ‘preferentially treated’? I do know that Mortgage Tax relief once existed but tha...
  • Mohammed Amin
    I agree with James Hill. I found our Party Leadership's reaction disappointing, and am pleased that some MPs have already pushed back. I think Ed Davey has ...
  • Alex Macfie
    Perhaps we should take a few steps back before getting hooked on the tech bros' kool-aid. It's a serious error to assume that whatever technology is currently i...
  • PM
    @ Mick, "People who took their pension before 2016 have to survive on £12500 a year or £250 per week." To be correct you should be saying "so...