Tag Archives: jenkinsite group

Introducing The Jenkinsite Group

For the longest time, I have regarded myself as a “Jenkinsite”. For many in the Lib Dems, they will understand what that means. For those who aren’t in the party or aren’t as clued up on political history, I’m usually met with the response, “A what?”

For the avoidance of doubt, a Jenkinsite is someone who supports the ideas espoused by Roy Jenkins. They usually consist of:

  • Multilateralism
  • Electoral reform
  • Social democracy
  • Social libertarianism
  • Liberal internationalism
  • Pro-European Integration
  • Support for a social market economy

Small differences in the extent to which someone believes in each tenet or how they interpret them may occur, as with every political ideology, but that is, for the most part, the meat and potatoes of Jenkinsite politics.

I digress: 13 days ago, I posted on Bluesky about being a Jenkinsite, which led to a conversation with another Liberal Democrat member about creating a Jenkinsite group. While groups like the Social Liberal Forum exist, which could be argued to be very similar in nature, this would be a group for people interested specifically in the Jenkinsite strand of politics, as well as the political history surrounding Roy Jenkins, the SDP and Liberal Party alliance, and, of course, the formation of the Liberal Democrats.

So, that’s what I decided to do. On Friday, 16 January, I created The Jenkinsite Group on Facebook. The brief for the group is simple: a community for Lib Dem members and supporters who wish to a) influence party policy with Jenkinsism, b) discuss and debate political ideas, and c) discuss political history and share our own political journeys and experiences.

As of today, we have 94 members.

It’s a mix of lay Lib Dem members and supporters, councillors, and even a member of the House of Lords!

The invite is open to all Lib Dems who are interested in joining us.

If that’s you, then just click this link.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | Leave a comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Nonconformistradical
    "Fuel-duty cuts are also poorly targeted. The more fuel you use, the more you save, so someone driving a large, inefficient SUV gains more than someone in a sma...
  • Nick Baird
    I find myself disagreeing with most of Ed's ad-hoc policy announcements (including nukes, defence bonds, fuel tax cuts) which rarely stand up to scrutiny becaus...
  • Matt Wardman
    My immediate (and somewhat side-eyed) comment is to ask on the penetration of SUV ownership amongst Lib Dem voters and potential voters compared to the general ...
  • paul barker
    Its reasonable to make some attempt to predict likely futures. Reform continue their slow but steady decline, by 2029 they are likely to be back in the Others ...
  • Peter Davies
    I believe three years was mentioned and that's optimistic but not ridiculous. The problem is that without that growth our public services will collapse within a...