Tag Archives: migration matters

Stephen Tall

Nick Clegg’s speech on immigration: baby steps in a liberal direction

By Stephen Tall | Wed 6th August 2014 - 9:30 pm

Nick Clegg Q&A 12When I read Nick Clegg’s immigration speech yesterday I breathed a sigh of relief. It’s sensible and mostly liberal.

Which means it’s a stark contrast to his March 2013 attempt: that was probably the most dire speech I’ve ever heard from a Lib Dem leader. Back then, Nick took credit for net migration having fallen by a third, even though net migration is, as Vince Cable has repeatedly pointed out, an absurd measure of success. He also came up with the unworkable proposal for security bonds (ie, upfront cash payments) for immigrants from ‘high-risk’ countries entering the UK.

Fast forward 18 months and both have been ditched.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , and | 14 Comments
Stephen Tall

It’s “Immigration Hysteria Day”. Again. Here’s how Lib Dems need to respond

By Stephen Tall | Wed 27th November 2013 - 9:35 am

Another day, another bout of “the UK’s about to be invaded by 29 million Bulgarians and Romanians” hysteria. But today it’s not Nigel Farage splattering mis-shapen statistics into the debate: it’s the Prime Minister, David Cameron – increasingly resembling Mr Farage’s mini-me – who’s showing leadership by following the tabloid press. Here’s how the BBC lists the new proposals:

  • New migrants will not get out-of-work benefits for the first three months
  • Payments will be stopped after six months unless the claimant has a “genuine” chance of a job
  • The “habitual residency test” to determine eligibility for benefits will be tightened up
  • An earnings

…

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , and | 44 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    If Britain is to join the EU (or even the Single Market/a new Customs Union) there has to be a broad consensus across the political spectrum. That means ther...
  • Mick Taylor
    My recollection is that the constitution gives control over voting to the states, so there would be no federal intervention possible....
  • Peter Davies
    "Please Democrats – where you now control state legislatures – reverse the suppression and the gerrymandering." Of course they should and probably will do t...
  • Martin Pierce
    Not mentioned much is the appalling voter suppression in Mississippi. 230,000 taken off the voter rolls earlier this year, strangely but completely coincidental...
  • cim
    I expect the answer is as simple as the Greens (and to a lesser extent the Lib Dems) were benefiting from the "Starmer is so terrible we can't vote Labour any m...