Tag Archives: official secrets act

Draconian changes proposed to Official Secrets Act

Out of the blue, on Saturday, we learned that The Law Commission has been at work. It proposes changing the Official Secrets Act to cover matters that are about what the government of the day considers to be matters of national economic interest. Anyone in unauthorised possession of material that might be included in the scope of the Act, or who transmits it or publishes could go to jail for up to ten years. There would be no restriction on who can commit the offence,” including hackers, leakers, elected politicians, journalists, and NGOs.

What this boils down to is the ability of government to shut people up. Imagine this; The Daily Boot is passed a paper that says that, as part of trade deal negotiations, HMG will allow US chicken treated with chlorine to be sold in the UK. If the news becomes public the trade talks might be jeopardised. The Boot’s editor either publishes and risks jail or lets the matter quietly drop. Ah, but that’s not good enough. Even being in possession or having had knowledge of the information could make the editor liable to prosecution. The Damoclesian Sword hangs forever over the editor’s neck.

The Liberal Democrat MP for Old Sallop can’t raise the matter in the Commons, as that would mean the member admitting they know what is in the material, thus rendering themselves liable to prosecution.

The Law Commission has published an enormous consultation document called Protection of Official Data.

I put consultation in italics because the Commission claims it has already consulted widely, though this statement is as thinner than an After Eight mint crushed by ten-ten road roller.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 19 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 12th Nov - 1:41pm
    If the General Election does not solve Brexit then it is time to consider a non-political solution to this mess. One solution is to form...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 12th Nov - 1:20pm
    Jeff / Mack: Democracy means that democratic mandates can be challenged and replaced at any time. Every mandate replaces a previous one. Campaigning to replace...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 12th Nov - 1:09pm
    "Their plan to renegotiate a deal is yet more evidence that they (Labour) are a Brexit party." ??? The disadvantage for any party proposing to...
  • User Avatarlloyd harris 12th Nov - 12:55pm
    Thank you for shedding a light on yet another part of forgotten history
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 12th Nov - 12:31pm
    If "the UK has been at the bottom of the G7 growth rates" and this "remains true today in 2019", how is it that Germany...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 12th Nov - 12:15pm
    Alex, I think you are right when you say 'There was no majority for a PV in the last Parliament.' However, I think you are...