Tag Archives: Opportunity Party

What can the Liberal Democrats learn from New Zealand’s Opportunity Party?

New Zealand’s Opportunity Party (TOP) could hold the balance of power after the 7 November election. A late-October poll put it on 7.2%, potentially securing nine MPs and entering Parliament for the first time.

For Liberal Democrats, TOP’s significance lies in its radical centrism: combining support for enterprise and growth with substantial reforms to taxation, income security and economic power. Its policies connect two questions too often discussed separately: how do we produce more wealth, and how should we distribute it?

Security and productive investment

TOP’s flagship proposal combines a Citizen’s Income of approximately NZ$19,400 annually for eligible adults with a 1.75% annual tax on residential and commercial land values.

A guaranteed income provides security and contributes to freedom from domination, while land taxation discourages speculation and encourages development. Buildings and improvements are excluded from the tax, preserving incentives to construct and improve homes. For too long, investors in the UK have been encouraged to pursue rising land and property prices because the expected returns exceed those available from investment in businesses, technology, and innovation. Taxing land values would help shift those incentives towards activities that raise productivity and create new wealth.

Together, these policies would use a share of socially created land wealth to finance individual economic security, while encouraging investment towards productive enterprise. Redistribution would therefore help create the conditions for growth, giving people the resources to develop their abilities and businesses stronger incentives to invest.

Competition and economic power

TOP’s support for business comes with a willingness to challenge powerful incumbents. It proposes stronger competition enforcement, including powers for the Commerce Commission to seek court-supervised break-ups of dominant businesses. It also supports increased research and development spending, technology adoption incentives, and business incubators.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 1 Comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    "it is regrettable that the freed slaves got nothing" Freed slaves didn't get "nothing". They got freedom. I don't recall many electing to stay in chains ...
  • Judy Abel
    @Jana while I think obesity is a problem to be tackled to prevent long term conditions I do think the NHS needs to get to grips with its safety issues. In the B...
  • Andrew Tampion
    "What neither mention is that when slavery was abolished compensation was paid to the slave owners out of public money for the loss of their “assets”" I ag...
  • Tristan Ward
    @ Caron Lindsay "we need a message that is nationally relevant." Which bit of: "We need more growth" "We need to do something about climate change" "...
  • Andrew Tampion
    So if I said that the overwhelming majority of remain voters from 1975 had died and that therefore the 2016 referendum was justified you'd be fine with that?...