Tag Archives: wealth inequality

The chaos dividend: Why the ultra-rich thrive on an unstable world, and why that’s rational in the short term and suicidal in the long term

The richest people in the world have more to lose from disorder than anyone. They have the most property, the most complex legal structures protecting it, the deepest interest in enforceable contracts and functioning courts. By any straightforward logic, they should be the most committed defenders of stable institutions and predictable governance.

They are not. The reason isn’t greed, or not primarily. It is something both more mundane and more intractable: it is how the system is built.

Extreme wealth, at the levels we are discussing, is not really a quantity. It is a capability: the capability to move fast, to hold options, to convert assets across time and geography in ways unavailable to anyone operating with less capital. A pension fund is slow. A small investor is constrained. A working family’s primary asset is their labour, which is geographically fixed and entirely non-diversifiable.

The ultra-rich face none of these constraints. And this matters the moment the world becomes uncertain, because options are most valuable precisely when the future is most unclear. Uncertainty is, structurally, a gift to anyone with sufficient optionality. And optionality is what extreme wealth is.

The machinery by which instability converts into wealth concentration runs through three mechanisms.

The first is crisis acquisition. When asset prices collapse, those with capital can buy. The 2008 financial crisis is the most instructive example. Ordinary households lost jobs, homes, and pension savings. When quantitative easing flooded the system with cheap money, asset prices inflated dramatically. Those who owned assets got richer. Those whose primary asset was their labour got stagnant wages and a decade of austerity. Covid-19 repeated the pattern almost exactly.

Posted in Op-eds | 3 Comments

Lib Dems must get tougher on wealth inequality

It’s beyond infuriating.

We’ve waited 14 long years for a so-called centre-left Chancellor, only to find ourselves on the brink of more belt-tightening when we desperately need bold, transformative action. After the havoc of a global pandemic, a bruising cost of living crisis, and a recession that destroyed the livelihoods of millions, Rachel Reeves is already sounding the alarm for further austerity. Instead of rallying for the public investment we so desperately need, she’s searching for corners to cut and taxes to squeeze from the working and middle classes. But let’s be clear: the money to fund our public services is out there. The only thing missing is the political will to seize it.

We’re teetering on the edge of an inequality crisis so severe, it threatens to tear the very fabric of our society apart. The problem is not those on six figure salaries, it’s not even really the millionaires—it’s about the billionaires at the summit, whose wealth allows them to wield power and privilege in ways that are as undemocratic as they are dangerous. 

If we don’t embrace radical wealth redistribution, we’re condemning ourselves to a future where the super-rich rule over the rest, unchecked and unchallenged.

In the last few years alone, UK-based billionaires have seen their fortunes soar by 1000%, concentrating economic power in the hands of a microscopic elite. Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, is the poster child for this grotesque disparity. When Musk bought Twitter, he acquired a global loudspeaker to broadcast his toxic, transphobic race-war baiting rhetoric. This is not benign accumulation of wealth; it’s a direct assault on democracy itself. In a country like the UK, where social tensions are simmering at best, Musk’s actions are a recipe for disaster.

And let’s not forget  J K Rowling. Her wealth has given her a platform to dismiss the rights of trans people—a group she neither belongs to nor understands.

The influence of billionaires isn’t just a moral abomination. It’s a fundamental threat to the economy. Since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, the number of billionaires in the UK rose by 20%, while the rest of us were plunged in to a cost-of-living crisis and the highest tax burden in a generation.

When a handful of individuals control more wealth than millions of citizens combined, they can bend politics and policy to their will, sidelining the needs of the many.  This isn’t just wrong – it’s a betrayal of the social contract, a breach of the promise that every person should have a fair shot at success.

The billionaire class doesn’t just hoard wealth,  they weaponise it. They use their riches to lobby for tax breaks, deregulation, and policies that entrench their power and rig the system even further in their favour. This isn’t simply an economic issue,  it’s a moral crisis. A society that allows such staggering inequality to flourish is one where the social fabric is ripping at the seams, where the chance for upward mobility is little more than a cruel joke.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 21 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Paul, I accept you are agreeing to an extent. A limited extent. "There are ample legal mechanisms for ensuring that the financial settlement with t...
  • Paul WalterPaul Walter
    Peter: “We shouldn’t tolerate the term “Crown Dependency” being a synonym for “tax haven”.” I don’t know whether you are actually reading my ...
  • David Raw
    I rather thought the 3rd Duke and Duchess of Atholl sold the Isle of Man's feudal and sovereign rights in 1765 for £70,000 via the Isle of Man Purchase Act 176...
  • Roland
    @Peter Martin - I was responding to the curved ? ball Jeff throw out about Motability: If they can't charge VAT then its okay to reclaim the VAT rather than sim...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Simon, "Low earners on the IOM pay tax at 21% compared to – I think – 20% in the UK" I don't know where you get your IOM figure from. It is easy eno...