Tag Archives: workfare

Caron Lindsay

Might some of the welfare changes be a little more helpful to people than Osborne made out?

By Caron Lindsay | Mon 30th September 2013 - 9:43 pm

Conservative Conference week is never an easy time to be a Liberal Democrat. The Conservative in its natural habitat is not a pretty sight to those of us who cherish the principles at the heart of the preamble to our constitution, of liberty, equality and community, of freeing people from poverty, ignorance or conformity. The words Tory leaders use to rally their troops give us that joyless feeling that is known in Scotland as the dry boak.

But, you know, the Tory conference is what the Cabinet table would be like if it weren’t for the Liberal Democrats in Government. …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 70 Comments
Stephen Tall

Benefits, back-to-work and the unemployed: what Lib Dem members think

By Stephen Tall | Sun 31st March 2013 - 2:15 pm

Lib Dem Voice polled our members-only forum recently to discover what Lib Dem members think of various political issues, the Coalition, and the performance of key party figures. Some 650 party members have responded, and we’re publishing the full results.

70% say: withdraw unemployment benefits IF job offers refused without ‘good reason’

In principle, do you support or oppose withdrawing benefits from unemployed people who refuse offers of work without good reason?

    70% – Support

    21% – Oppose

    9% – Don’t know

The overwhelming view — held by 7-in-10 of those Lib Dems who responded — was that in principle withdrawing benefits …

Continue reading »
Posted in LDV Members poll | Also tagged and | 24 Comments
Stephen Tall

Mandatory work: if we believe in evidence-based policy it’s probably best to pay attention to the evidence

By Stephen Tall | Sat 16th June 2012 - 4:10 pm

Four months ago, when the political row over ‘workfare’ was at its peak, I wrote here on LibDemVoice that liberals needed to progress the debate beyond ‘the simple and simplistic ‘left/right’ attitudes currently on display, and start grappling with how best we can empower the individual to make the best of their own lives — including, and especially, those who appear to have settled for a life on benefits, and reject all other offers of help.’

Avoiding dogma, embracing evidence

Key to this, I suggested, would be avoiding the dogmatic approaches of the Tories — who appear to believe that every …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , and | 16 Comments
Daniel Henry

Opinion: An attempt to bring a calm and rational solution to the workfare issue

By Daniel Henry | Mon 5th March 2012 - 10:54 am

There’s been a lot of controversy around the “workfare” issue. However, while individual members have expressed clear opinions on it, our party is yet to take an official stance on the issue. With a policy paper on youth unemployment to be debated this weekend at conference we have an opportunity to decide where we stand on the issue.

I propose that we make the system fairer and ease the controversy by securing the following three compromises from the Tories:

1) Ensuring jobseekers aren’t misled into voluntary work schemes.

Although the scheme is voluntary, many jobseekers report being misled by Job Centres. Some …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | 15 Comments
Stephen Tall

LDVideo: Nick Clegg – Workfare critics have a “messed up set of priorities”

By Stephen Tall | Fri 2nd March 2012 - 10:10 am

Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg this week launched a passionate defence of the Coalition’s work experience initiatives, arguing that they help prepare jobless young people for employment. This follows the controversy about ‘workfare’, which some critics have labelled ‘slave labour’, an attitude Nick condemns here as displaying a “messed up set of priorities”:

Continue reading »
Posted in YouTube | Also tagged | 17 Comments
David M Gibson

Opinion: The empowering world of unpaid work

By David M Gibson | Mon 27th February 2012 - 10:54 am

Last week, an article was published here attacking Tesco for exploiting the unemployed. Two major factual errors, albeit fairly understandable ones, were at the heart of the piece.

The first was that Tesco’s unpaid work experience scheme was being forced upon the unemployed by the Job Centre. In actuality, participation was voluntary and the scheme was not part of the government’s Mandatory Work Experience (aka ‘workfare’). In neither scheme is work unpaid, as benefits are paid in exchange for labour.

The second error was to suggest Tesco was ‘expecting the jobless to line-up’ for exploitation. The truth of the matter …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | 32 Comments
Stephen Tall

‘Workfare’: the depressingly sterile ‘left/right’ debate is a challenge to liberals to sharpen our thinking

By Stephen Tall | Sun 26th February 2012 - 8:50 am

Deborah Orr has a must-read article in the Guardian highlighting the inverted absurdity of this week’s row about the Coalition’s workfare programme, The slanging match over workfare is getting us nowhere.

She points out that the very essence of workfare is government intervention in the workings of the free market, the state urging private companies to offer work experience placements to the unemployed:

For the right, such hapless, inefficient intervention by the state is anathema. When the private sector is left to make its own arrangements, neo-liberals never tire of pointing out, it functions better, to the advantage of all.

…

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 24 Comments

Opinion: Work-fare or work fair? Why I shan’t be shopping at Tesco

By Former Organiser | Wed 22nd February 2012 - 6:56 pm

It seems that Tesco finally bowed to public pressure and is no longer expecting the jobless to line-up and provide them with four weeks of unpaid labour. Whilst I was pleased to read this, it was too little, too late for me. Do Tesco expect us to be pleased that they’re finally offering to pay people in return for their hard work?

This has taught us an awful lot about Tesco’s ethical beliefs. The company was happy to accept unpaid labour before the public knew about it, but as soon as they started receiving negative press coverage, they brought the scheme …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 54 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJenny Barnes 26th Jan - 5:27pm
    V for vendetta masks. And why is my email getting put in the website thing?
  • User AvatarJames Fowler 26th Jan - 5:21pm
    @innocent bystander - spot on with all your comments.
  • User AvatarRichard Malim 26th Jan - 5:18pm
    The important point is that only in 15 seats was the winning majority under 5000, and in 11 under 10,000, with 2 SNP and 2...
  • User AvatarPaul 26th Jan - 5:16pm
    Here is a better list: http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/battleground/targets/liberal-democrat
  • User AvatarGeoffrey Payne 26th Jan - 5:12pm
    It would be a lot more helpful (although more complicated) if you would work out the percentage of the majority rather than the absolute number.
  • User AvatarJohn Peters 26th Jan - 4:36pm
    @Nick Collins https://www.libdemvoice.org/fifty-ps-for-refugees-63064.html