Televised party leader debates: get your worms at the ready

The “worm” is an instant poll tracker which wriggles across people’s TV screens, showing the net negative or positive reaction of a small group of the public to what is happening on screen. Running a worm across a politician’s speech or a debate between politicians has become a not uncommon feature of political coverage across many democracies.

The worm has even occasionally surfaced in the UK – so will it surface again for our TV party leader debates at the general election? And will worms offer a chance for Channel 4 to repeat an Australian trick and put one over the other channels who have excluded it from the debates?

Known in the US as dial groups (because a group of people is each given a dial to twist towards positive or negative), worms have often been the cause of controversy there. Joe Klein in Politics Lost recounts how badly they got the 2000 Bush-Gore debates wrong:

The first debate was a classic example of the perils of dial groups. “The dials were terrific for us,” [Gore Press Secretary] Lehane recalled. “You could hear the guy who kept track of the machine calling out the numbers – 92, 78, 88 – fabulous numbers every time Gore spoke. Shrum and some of the other folks were, like, ‘The election’s over. We’re cleaning his clock.’ I had my doubts. I just smelled the arrogance thing happening.’

He was right about the smell – because the post debate reaction was highly critical of Gore for perceived arrogance. His campaign did anything but soar to victory after the debate.

One reason for the worm’s fallibility is that it only captures of the moment reaction. As Klein also wrote of another occasion,

If anything negative was said, the dials would plummet. This was, of course, computerized hokum: people might not like a negative message, but that didn’t mean they wouldn’t remember it and act on it. The dials could catch momentary reactions but not overall impressions.

However, the worm is great fun to watch – and there will be great temptation for one TV channel to put a worm on its coverage in order to get viewers to come to its channel. With the news so far that the footage from two of the three debates (BBC and Sky, but not ITV) being immediately available to other broadcasters, a broadcaster excluded from the debates could take the footage, add a worm and get the audience coming to it.

Indeed, this is exactly what happened in the last Australian federal elections, where one channel added a worm – to great controversy, with its footage being pulled part way through the live debate before being hurriedly restored from another source.

What chance Channel 4 or someone else trying the same here?

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Brad Barrows
    Sunak and Javid may be hoping to salvage their reputations by choosing to distance themselves from the current PM…or they could be making their moves to be in...
  • Tristan Ward
    Time for a vote of no confidence to force tory MPs to declare their position on the record....
  • Mick Taylor
    I hope David Raw is tongue in cheek in his comments. He knows full well that LibDems in Scotland do not, in the main, support independence, though some do. Part...
  • Joseph Bourke
    The resignation of Sajid Javid and Rishi Sunak feels like the Geoffrey Howe moment that led to the resignation of Mrs Thatcher....
  • David Raw
    Question : “Should a late middle aged overweight male of untidy (and often unseemly) habits, exhibiting early signs of convenient memory loss, be regarded ...