The coalition agreement: pensions and older people

Welcome to the fifteenth in a series of posts going through the full coalition agreement section by section. You can read the full coalition document here.

The story of this section in a nutshell is “short term good news, long term uncertainty”. In the short term pensions will get a good deal: “We will restore the earnings link for the basic state pension from April 2011, with a ‘triple guarantee’ that pensions are raised by the higher of earnings, prices of 2.5%”. This is a more generous deal, and sooner, than Labour proposed in their manifesto.

There is also a promise to “implement the Parliamentary and Health Ombudsman’s recommendations to make fair and transparent payments to Equitable Life policy holders”, greater flexibility over how people can use their pension funds, pledges to protect the winter fuel allowance, free TV licenses, free bus travel, free eye tests and prescriptions and a simplification of the rules to encourage more occupational pensions.

That’s the good news. The doubts come from a promised review of the date at which the state pension starts and a commission to review the long-term affordability of public sector pensions.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • What happened to David Cameron’s rather vague promise to scrap the Mandatory Retirement Age and extend employment protection to people of all ages?

    Two of Mr Cameron’s ministers are over the MRA (Ken Clarke and Vince Cable), as are five of our current MPs (and more to follow during the course of the Parliament).

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Rose Runswick
    @theakes I don't think Zack Polanski has any intention of expanding his base beyond Corbynites, which is no issue for him as in over doubling the membership thr...
  • Tristan Ward
    "This is a powerful condemnation of neoliberalism." No it isn't. As previously noted it is a set of whinges with a certain amount of inaccuracy (*). They ...
  • Peter Davies
    I think you could claim that a dogmatic insistance on a single ownership model has failed. Labour brought the "crowning heights" of the economy into public own...
  • Judy Abel
    @David Thank you. You put it so well. The pendulum has swing too far - too many are being fleeced now by ruthless private interests, both consumers and the stat...
  • David Allen
    This is a powerful condemnation of neoliberalism. Claims that other factors beside neoliberalism can sometimes also be significant serve only to muddy the wate...