The male dominance of online British politics

One of the curious of political blogging in the UK is how male dominated it is. Although the Office of National Statistics’s figures show that the majority of bloggers in the UK are female and the majority of voters are female too, take a look through lists of Conservative, Labour or Lib Dem bloggers and you see lists that are dominated by men. The same applies with other parties and independent blogs. Political blogging in the UK is male dominated. But why?

One explanation is that UK politics overall is male dominated. Just look at the number of MPs or Cabinet members of each gender. Yet women and men turn out to vote in roughly equal proportions and, because there are more women than men on the electoral register, the majority of voters are usually female. Given that anyone can create a blog, why would the male domination kick in at the level of blogging?

A similar phenomenon is seen with commenting on political blogs, where the comments threads are more usually dominated by men. In this case questions of moderating rules and the culture that builds up around the comment threads on a site go some way to providing explanations. However, the similarity in the blogging and commenting patterns also suggests common factors are at work explaining both.

The internet and the 2010 election: putting the small ‘p’ back in politics? - book coverA clue as to how to answer all this is in the polling done for the recent Hansard Society publication The internet and the 2010 election. Overall it found that 51% of adult male UK internet users engaged with the general election online, either via official routes (such as visiting a party website) or unofficial ones (such as forwarding a link to a satirical online video). Amongst adult female internet users it was just 38%, 13 percentage points lower.

Looking specifically at posting political comments on blogs or social networks, 8% of male adult internet users did this and 4% of women did (though some caution should be applied about margins of error on these smaller numbers). The Hansard Society report concludes that “in general men were considerably more likely to engage in the online campaign compared with women”.

That finding is comparable to other evidence, such as the balance of male and female fans of the Lib Dem Voice page on Facebook and (in 2009, the most recent data I have seen) for the official Liberal Democrat page. Both are heavily male.

In other words, the male dominance of blogging and commenting seems to reflect a wider question of engagement with politics in the UK rather than specific features of either of those two practices. That may not answer my original questions, but it makes it clearer where the answers are to be found and, as evidence from newspaper letters pages suggest, the answer may not lie online at all.

Perhaps partly too it is a question of gender differences when it comes to self-promotion. There are plenty of individuals who defy the clichés about men being more willing to say “look at wonderful me” than women. But there is also evidence suggesting that there is overall a difference here, as reflected in the male dominance of Digg and Reddit but which drops away as you move to social networks that are less about “hey, *I* think this story is important”.

Both those statistics and the ONS figures were pointed out to me by Jennie Rigg, who in her own thought-provoking post on this topic said,

Yet another part of the problem is that although what might be termed initial content (blogs, tweets, etc.) is majority-female, promotion tools, such as Digg, Technorati, blog aggregators like Lib Dem Blogs, etc. are majority-male. So men recommend posts by men to other men.

It’s a problem I found when selecting two posts each Saturday evening for inclusion in our former Sunday View feature. Despite deliberately wanting to have a range of bloggers featured over time that was a diverse set of people, with good geographic spread and a fair sprinkling of new names in amongst the regulars I know from the tallies that I sometimes made that it often ended up far short of that.

An important caveat to this – and one Jennie also points out – is that I have used “politics” as a shorthand for politics in the sense of elected public office and the elections, campaigns, debates, candidates and parties that go with that. Politics has other meanings too, and in particular my definition excludes much of the online commentary about feminism which other definitions would count as politics. Even so, there are other issues here than solely the question of how “politics” is defined.

In particular, a worry is that as the number of people online and the number of hours spent online both continue to grow in the UK, that may reinforce rather than undermine the historic male-dominance of British electoral politics. Such broad issues very rarely have a quick or simple solution, but here’s one suggestion. Local parties are used to making efforts, often very successful, to attempt to get a broad and diverse range of people standing in their patch for local elections. Why not apply some of that to trying to ensure that the team of people who is involved in running the local party website, Facebook group or other online presences is similarly diverse?

And if you have other suggestions, why not share them in the comments?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Online politics.


  • Purely an observation from my own experience – but men seem more interested in displaying their intellectual worth than women which I think could be a contributing factor

  • the main is of men online is due to the fact that women are the hardest hit by the cuts and therefore have no time to blog as they are trying to protect the vulnerable.

  • Good and timely article Mark – but I wonder if the real problem is more prosaic: that men are simply more opinionated than women?

  • Matthew Huntbach 8th Sep '10 - 12:58pm

    Well obviously it’s all down to discrimination isn’t it, so we must tack;e that by all-female bloglists etc. Maybe every so often, LibDemVoice should be turned “all female” i.e. any postings to it made by non-females should be rendered inaccessible.

    Or maybe not, and maybe from this some might see why all-female shortlists and the like are not really tackling the deeper problem of which what is observed is just a symptom.

  • It’s a bit disingenuous to automatically call this a “problem”.

    In an environment of limited size – the House of Commons, say – then relative numbers of men and women are important. The success of men in getting elected prevents women from achieving seats and influence.

    On blogs, though, it’s not a zero sum game. There are lots of female bloggers, but there are even more male bloggers. Readers can choose to follow who they want and the higher output of male writers doesn’t prevent people from finding posts by female writers.

    And, of course, just “being a blogger” is no badge of success. There’s reams and reams of brainspew all over the internet. Just because the raw number of men bloggers is higher than that of women doesn’t imply that increasing the number of female bloggers is a desirable thing. The majority of what is written is ignored by internet users. Probably more important to concentrate on getting women (and other minorities) involved in local activism and running as candidates for election and, if they are successful there, *then* to consider writing about it.

  • 19 comments, and 17 for of them sure by men 😉

    I’m put off debate elsewhere because it rarely seems to rise beyond name-calling and a total unwillingness to consider anyone else’s point of view.
    Certainly some political blogs seem to attract incredibly intolerant and often vile commenters it would be pointless to try to engage with.

    Take a quick glance at the comments on ‘David Cameron’s father has died’ on Guido’s blog… nice people out there.

  • @Cassie: Good heavens. I need to wash my brain now.

  • Sorry, Thomas: I should’ve put a health warning on the suggestion!

    Gotta love ‘ads by Google.’
    Thread on male dominance online and it produces a link to “100s Genuine Moldovan Women Wonderful Wives”.

  • Cassie: “I’m put off debate elsewhere because it rarely seems to rise beyond name-calling and a total unwillingness to consider anyone else’s point of view.”

    Agreed. While everything I say here is only based on my own experience etc., the debate I’ve seen of this kind is dominated by men, and I certainly also know many women who don’t think it’s worth bothering with. Personally I don’t know why anyone regardless of gender is interested in that kind of conversation, but I’ve had male friends tell me it is a male thing, so.

    I also think Niklas Smith’s point about men being more likely to stand up and repeat points made by others even if it adds absolutely nothing to the discussion is a contributing factor; I’ve seen this in many debates, some of them ironically about feminism and women’s inclusion.

    One further contributing factor is in a lot of the discussions I’ve had with men about feminism, my experience of being a woman doesn’t seem to count for anything unless I can ‘prove’ it, presumably with statistics (see above on unwillingness to listen to anyone else’s point of view).

    I think the problem is often with the style of conversation being had (unproductive), and I’d be interested to know why those involved seem to be mostly male.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Simon R
    I'm also rather puzzled by Michael's post to me. In particular, I've said a couple of times that any job guarantee scheme would have to somehow provide for peop...
  • Simon R
    The ONS figures ( show £38 600 was the mean gross salary for full-time workers in 2020....
  • Paul Holmes
    @Mick Taylor. What happened post 2010 is an entirely different matter. The best Target Seat campaign in the world would have made little difference to the self ...
  • Paul Holmes
    @Mick Taylor. Except that what you say is totally untrue of the period I referred to. From 1997 to 2001 to 2005 to 2010 the number of Target Seats grew at each ...
  • Mary Fulton
    Nonconformistradical I would define ready as having our candidates in place in all constituencies. I don’t know how far down the road we are on this across t...