Today’s PMQs

My feed reader shows me the latest Iain Dale Daley Dozen in which he points to us and asks why we didn’t cover PMQs today.

Although it may not have been our finest hour, the real reason is that Stephen, who usually covers that for us, is away, and none of the rest of us remembered until we were prompted.

For the sake of completeness, here is the full exchange between Vince Cable, covering for Nick Clegg today, and Hariet Harman, who was in the Prime Minister’s shoes.

Dr. Vincent Cable (Twickenham) (LD) rose—

Hon. Members: Hear, hear!

Mr. Speaker: Order.

Dr. Cable: May I begin by adding my condolences over the soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq?

It was reported earlier this week that Her Majesty the Queen had cancelled her diamond wedding celebrations because it was judged inappropriate to engage in extravagance at a time of economic gloom and recession. Does the Leader of the House share my view that that demonstrates Her Majesty’s unerring instinct for the public mood, or do the Government think that she was overreacting?

Ms Harman rose—

Mr. Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman should not discuss Her Majesty the Queen. Perhaps he could try asking another question. He has used one up, and he will not get another after that.

Dr. Cable: I am very happy for the Leader of the House to return to the issue of economic gloom and recession. Does she agree with that assessment?

Ms Harman: As I told the right hon. Member for Richmond, Yorks (Mr. Hague), our concern is to ensure that people continue to have jobs. As the hon. Gentleman will know, the economy still contains 670,000 vacancies, and we want to ensure that it continues to grow as it has for some 62 consecutive quarters.

Dr. Cable rose—

Mr. Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman is out of order. I must move on.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News and PMQs.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Hywel Morgan 2nd Apr '08 - 11:44pm

    It was only not our finest hour if it was an omission. I’m not so sure it was and we were trying to make a point about the antiquated rules that govern Parliament.

    Coming on the day that the Information Commissioner overruled Commons authorities and required disclosure of how allowances are spent on party propaganda (sorry members newsletters) it seemed like a pretty good point

  • David Morton 3rd Apr '08 - 8:51am

    I think Michael Martin came out of this worse than Vince. While its a mild clanger to mention the Queen in a PMQ when rules say you can’t I though Martin was really partisan in the way he dealt with it.

    I’ve always held to the “dignity of office” arguement about Martin. We shouldn’t undermine him because the office he holds is more important than the efficency of a tempory holder of it.

    However after yesterday I don’t see why we shoyuldn’t just say he’s useless, biased and should go asap.

    The only reason to hold fire would be if we thought there was a reasonable chance of getting it for Ming or Alan Beith.

  • This isn’t the first time Speaker Martin has proven that he isn’t above the parties, but just a tool of the Labour Party. Speaker or not, Liberal Democrats should consider running a candidate against him in the next GE.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Chambers
    Thanks @Simon R for the comment. Yes more can be done within the Laws of Thermodynamics, or indeed the more complete Statistical Mechanics. And the UK is in the...
  • Freddie
    Rodrigo, re: a closed matter planetary system - taking your argument as true, can we not overcome this by venturing beyond our planet - mining asteroids, off wo...
  • John Waller
    Tom, I have always agreed with your views. But on Iran mine differ. During the war my Iranian friend sent me the Tiktok link above, and we talked for some tim...
  • David Warren
    The 1924 Labour government was desperate to appear respectable and it achieved that. However they were still brought down by a Red Scare. Returning to office...
  • Paul WalterPaul Walter
    Indeed the book writes extensively on Wedgwood, Haldane and Trevelyan in its "New Labour" section - along with others. Sorry I didn't mention this....