Tory council leader accuses Lib Dem MP of smear

The BBC has the story:

A Tory peer referred to the police over expenses says it is part of a campaign of “attacks and innuendo” by an MP. Lord Hanningfield claimed the unnamed MP was determined to “blacken my name” over education policy in Essex, where the peer is council leader.

The frontbencher claimed £99,970 over seven years for the cost of staying in London, despite living 40 miles away.

Lib Dem MP Bob Russell said he believed the peer was referring to him but added he was only interested in the facts. … Colchester MP Bob Russell, who raised Lord Hanningfield’s claims in the House of Commons on 21 June, did not confirm that he had made the complaint to police. But he said: “I have drawn to the attention of various authorities matters which I think are of concern which need looking at.”

Asked if he was attempting to smear the peer, he said: “He’s entitled to say what he wants. My job is to unearth the facts as I understand them and present them to the appropriate bodies to look at.”

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Tony Greaves 5th Jul '09 - 2:31pm

    £100,000 over 7 years does not sound too much for a regular attender. On a rough calc it’s about 500 nights which is about 70 a year.

    Hanningfield is entitled to claim overnight stays in London if his main address is in Essex. The only irregularity would be if he was claiming for any nights when he did not stay in London.

    Tony Greaves

  • Forlornehope 5th Jul '09 - 3:07pm

    Looks like a typical bit of LibDem black propaganda to me. The more I learn about the LibDems, the less I like them.

  • Terry Gilbert 5th Jul '09 - 5:29pm

    I have great respect for Lord Tony Greaves, but while he might think this is reasonable, for most people its more than their mortgage. He might have been ‘entitled’ by the rules, but was he morally entitled? Many people commute more than 40 miles. I suggest a poll….

  • Tony Greaves 5th Jul '09 - 5:52pm

    The reference was to the police. I was pointing out where any irregularity that could involve the police might possibly lie and saying that the rest was legitimate and therefore would not involve the police.

    But of course it is impossible to say anything about parliamentary allowances and expenses without raising hysterical and irrational responses. I should have known better.

    Tony Greaves

  • Herbert Brown 5th Jul '09 - 6:00pm

    Terry Gilbert:
    “He might have been ‘entitled’ by the rules, but was he morally entitled? Many people commute more than 40 miles. I suggest a poll….”

    Was Lord Rennard “morally entitled”, for heaven’s sake?

  • I note that Lord Hanngingfield claims that his expenses are “peanuts”. Perhaps that comment is worth publicising more widely, given that £100,000 represents more than four times the average annual salary.

    Also, according to a local paper he promised to publish his expenses monthly. Has he done so yet? See:

  • Antony Hook Antony Hook 5th Jul '09 - 11:40pm

    London-Chelmsford is a short distance done by commuters everyday.

    The Essex taxpayers provides him with a limosine and driver and the national taxpayer puts him up in London. It’s a bit excessive.

  • Talking about Peers ,has Lord Rennard repaid the £41,000 yet?

  • First thing the Tories on KCC did after the elections was to award themselves an 8% increase in allowances.

    Neither Lord Hanningfield, the Kent Tories or, sadly, Tony Greaves, seem to get it yet.

  • The question is whether hanningfield is a regular attender or not. I understand that his attendance in the Lords is quite below that of other Tory frontbenchers.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Merlene Emerson
    Update on my post: It has transpired that the last issue of Apple Daily will be 2 days earlier on Thursday 24 June. The reason given was that it is for the sa...
  • Michael 1
    @David Raw I clearly said that I admire much that the Labour party and the Labour movement has done over the past 150-200 years. I am I believe on the left o...
  • Nigel Hunter
    Interesting that court cases are going the rounds re Johnson,s govnt plus a shock loss of a 'safe' seat. Equally interesting that this OBON comes along AND a p...
  • David Raw
    Good for, Daisy. Is it too much to hope she succeeds to the full post of Leader asap to revitalise and re-energise this party ? Johnson must think it's cleve...
  • Peter Roberts
    ".... and tub thumping" Now there's a thought and it sums up Boriss' Brexit Britain very well, do you think Chumbawuma would object?...