Two useful steps forward in party business at conference

Despite a resurgence in recent years, the tabling of questions to party committee reports at Liberal Democrat conference is still very much a minority sport. So much so that 100% of questions to the Federal Policy Committee came from a certain North London Doctor with an penchant for chocolate…

The questions do however provide a good opportunity to ferret out information or push for a decision where you know the door is half-open. In my case this morning at Gateshead that resulted in questions to both the Federal Conference Committee and the Federal Policy Committee asking them to start publishing reports after each full meeting of their committees. (This was a follow-up to my conference motion that did not make it on to the agenda for lack of time.)

Andrew Wiseman on behalf of FCC said, “I’m more than happy to do this” and Jeremy Hargreaves for the FPC said, “Yes”. As I wrote about the putative motion:

One issue which comes up regularly in different ways is party members feeling they do not know what the party’s federal committees are up to in their name. Without getting too lost into the rights and wrongs of each individual case, I think we have a problem from both ends – committee members do not communicate enough and also members do not get in touch with them enough.

The way to break that is to improve the basic flow of information, so more information comes out from committees, prompting members in turn to ask and lobby more, prompting committee members in turn to respond and discuss more.

That’s two committee down, the Federal Executive to go (question this afternoon).

Aside from sharing the good news, my other reason for blogging this is to encourage more people to submit questions to committee reports in the future. When used in the right way, questions can be a very effective tool, just as they are in elected bodies, and provide a good half-way house between an email “to someone in the party” and a fully-fledged conference motion.

* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and Party policy and internal matters.


  • you can’t claim all the credit, Mark, this was also the subject of my questions at previous conferences, – it takes constant pressure from different quarters to wear down the resistance. Questions are not always addressed in the chamber, but they are inevitably read, and so must have an influence.
    Agreed, it is an opportunity to push the door open to get things to move, and I too wish more representatives would play a more active part. Committees will always carry on doing things ‘the way they have always been done’ until somebody from outside asks the objective question… and we have to keep asking until we get an answer. Well done in succeeding in getting a positive answer, now we have to make sure they carry it through.

  • Good point Peter – and thanks for pushing in the same direction!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Lorenzo Cherin
    Nigel If you scratch that veneer of toughness there may be some element of sense and consideration there. But crass and cruel headline comments are not fake,...
  • Nigel Jones
    Robin Stafford: "the 'market' is not always the answer". Well said, especially with the word 'always'; I remember when the telephone service was privatised a...
  • George Thomas
    This government broke the social contract when Zach Goldsmith was voted out of office but ended up in House of Lords and in The Cabinet regardless because of wh...
  • Roland
    William Wallace "Incidentally, if the Tories want to put growth above all else, their first priority should be to regain access to our most important oversea...
  • James Pugh
    @George Thomas Some documentation is of course required. However the extent of it (and time it takes to complete) takes police officers away from policing an...