Waste and recycling collections: the political perils

Today’s Financial Times reports on the electoral situation at Waverley council, where the Lib Dem group was reduced from 27 seats to three in the 2007 local elections after introducing fortnightly waste collections to boost recycling rates. It also notes the problems suffered by Labour in Telford, Shropshire and Blackburn, and by the Conservatives in North Lincolnshire, for the same reasons.

Celia Savage, one of the surviving Lib Dem councillors in Waverley, claims the Tories ruthlessly exploited the issue of fortnightly bin collections in the run-up to the poll. Stories abounded of stinking garbage piling up in people’s gardens while queues of cars snaked for miles from the local rubbish tip.

“What made it worse was that it was a hot summer, people complained that their bags were getting very smelly,” admits Mrs Savage. “But the issue was exaggerated. If the timing had been different things could have settled down and people would have got used to it.”

So, have the people of Waverley had their weekly collections restored as a result of voting out the Lib Dems? No – as the FT reports, “The Tories, who now run Waverley council, have kept the fortnightly waste collection.”

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Local government and News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • I don’t think it is, but you do have to time the introduction right, i.e. you don’t want it just before a set of elections! It’s also about how you do it – in Fife, we have the combination of the blue paper bins and black general waste bins which are collected on a fortnightly cycle, and another garden waste bin which is collected on a different cycle – introduced by Labour when they were in administration.

    This alone though won’t get landfill down, and in trying to look at alternative ways though pilot schemes (i.e. more recycling, possibly monthly general waste with a fortnightly food waste collection) but all alternatives are being opposed by – yes – Labour, who are now in opposition!

    Until all parties stop scoring the easy political goals and start looking sensibly at the issues, we’re not going to get anywhere – although you’d think that the prospect of significant fines would be focussing efforts.

  • I think fortnightly collections were at least part of the reason the Lib Dems lost several seats on Harborough DC in 2007. The Lib Dems headed a minority administration until then.

    The Tories are have been in control for nearly 2 years now and fortnightly collections remain in place.

  • Pedant warning – Labour had problems in ‘Telford, Shropshire’ and ‘Blackburn, Lancashire’ – not Telford, Blackburn AND Shropshire, which is a massively Tory county council (soon to be merged with the district councils under it to become a unitary, but that’s by the by)

  • Liberal Neil 2nd Mar '09 - 6:51pm

    I think a lot depends on how you introduce alternate weekly collections, how you sell the change and how you deal with the problems (actual and perceived).

    Yes there are councils where the administration has lost out on the issue, but this often coincides with other factors in the campaign (certainly the case in Waverly).

    There are plenty of examples of councils that have continued to happily gain seats after introducing alternate weekly collections – Lib Dem run Eastleigh and Tory run Cherwell for example.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Ruth Bright
    Mary's first clarification here is really important as this point frightens many (ie losing a home they CURRENTLY live in to pay for someone else's care)...
  • David Allen
    Mary Reid (your first post on this thread): You're right - IF you want to rely on the tender mercies of your local council to part-fund your partner's care home...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    The choice seems clear – either funding care or protecting inheritances. If the first £10bn is scarce, it should go to carers and domiciliary care, not a cap...
  • Tristan Ward
    "Money is not a resource because it has no direct utility and no intrinsic production value." I think this means that I am better off being paid in kind rath...
  • Mary ReidMary Reid
    @Rif Winfield. Actually Carer's Allowance is not available at all to a large proportion of family carers - those on State Pension. To quote: "If your pension i...