What do the academics say? The science of bar charts

Welcome to the latest in our occasional series highlighting interesting findings from academic research. Today – bar charts. Or, more precisely: why bar charts? Not, why push tactical voting and ‘we can win here’ messages, but why bar charts rather than pie charts, line graphs, scatter graphs or any of the myriad of other graphical devices available?

Pie charts make an occasional appearance in political leaflets but bar charts are so much the dominant form that the idea of switching to pie charts was the concept behind one of Liberal Democrat Voice’s April 1st spoof postings a few years back. However, the reasoning behind this is talked about only very rarely, despite their being some hard-nosed scientific research behind it.

A good example is William S. Cleveland and Robert McGill’s academic paper Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods (September 1984, Journal of the American Statistical Association) (hat-tip: FlowingData).

Hull North bar chartWhat they found was that when it comes to the sorts of comparisons required for a tactical voting / we can win here message, scatter plots and bar charts generally are better understood than pie charts and graphical devices that rely on volume (rather than length) or intensity and shades of colours.

Where bar charts edge it over scatter plots in leaflet design is, in my view, that scatter plots need clear axises and space to be easy to follow. Bar charts work better in the more crowded environment of leaflets as they retain more of their clarity as other elements intrude around them than scatter plots do.

The 2011 World Infographics Summit also saw discussion over the relative merits of bar charts, pie charts and other graphical devices with, as Scientific American reported, the case for pie charts being harder to understand again being made. Most importantly, “the human brain is more adept at comparing lengths than areas”.

That’s all not to say that the choice of bar chart over other devices was based on careful psychological and graphical design research. But the advantages of bar charts do help explain why they seemed to be the right choice and why they prospered.

As for the first bar chart, I’ve so far traced the idea back to Chris Rennard’s Association of Liberal Councillors booklet in 1984, when he called them “block graphs” and included some examples from recent elections. Anyone got any earlier spots?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in What do the academics say?.
Advert

8 Comments

  • LondonStatto 28th Apr '11 - 10:02am

    Bar charts are trivially easy to distort, as well.

    http://www6.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2011/01/14/and-so-onto-barnsley-central/ is perhaps a slightly exaggerated version of the trend, but not every bar chart that has ever appeared in a political leaflet is as accurately-scaled as the Hull one shown in this article…

  • toryboysnevergrowup 28th Apr '11 - 10:12am

    So much easier for Libdems to play the old game of supressing the zero I’m afraid.

  • This one from the Tories compairng their result in a General Election year to Lab and Lib Dem from previous years has got to be the worst distortion of the bar chart.

    http://peterblack.blogspot.com/2011/04/really-dodgy-tory-bar-chart.html

  • @Colin Green – Astonishing! They used different elections to get the numbers for different parties!

  • Old Codger Chris 1st May '11 - 2:02pm

    Lies, Damned Lies and Bar Charts.

    The best Bar Charts are those comparing the Red Lion with the Dog & Duck.

  • @MBoy

    Astonishing! Their PPC last year in Swansea was the Lib Dem PPC in 2005, so I can guess where they’ve got that idea from.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Yvette
    Ed Davey has made a pact with the Labour leader. They want to rejoin the EU. At the last General Election. The Lib Dems wanted to over turn Brexit. ...
  • matt
    @Peter Martin "Neither am I saying that Covid is no more dangerous than flu. It certainly is for older people " The problem is Peter it is not just a case...
  • Peter Martin
    "We argued that Africa, with poor its health conditions and poorer health facilities, was likely to produce a highly transmissible mutant virus that would ...
  • Martin
    Tom Arms: Although I am a great fan of your articles (the previous one was brilliant), you have slipped up here on the French presidency. Michel Barnier, Xa...
  • Brad Barrows
    The interesting aspect of the current abortion challenge in the USA is the question of whether the issue of ‘viability’ or ‘choice’ should be the guidin...