“When the public booed Liam Fox for raising hung parliament concerns” – FT

In case you missed this week’s Question Time, here’s how the FT reported it:

Last night’s Question Time ended on an extraordinary note. The public are more in favour of a hung parliament than the Tories care to admit. But I never expected an audience to heckle and boo Liam Fox when he warned of an indecisive election result triggering a run on sterling…

This should be a salutary lesson to Cameron’s team. People seem to like the idea of politicians working together. The worm in the election debate shot up when Clegg spoke about a cross-party co-operation to tackle the deficit. And it took a dive when Cameron warned of the dangers of a hung parliament leaving Brown in power.

Full post and link to watch again here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • I think people shouldn’t be concerned about getting a hung parliament. They should be concerned about getting either a Labour or a Conservative government, once again.

  • But it’s not going to happen by itself. Lib Dems should be:
    1- Pursuing every vote in seats where the LDs are first, second or a close third.
    2- Voting Tory in Lab-Con micromarginals to make clear to Labour that they have had their last Commons majority.
    3- Voting Labour in Lab-Con marginals where Labour start 10%+ ahead to block a Tory majority

  • Malcolm Todd 2nd May '10 - 3:12pm

    FFS Hugh, have you seen the polls? There is no prospect of a Labour majority; there is, however, a very real prospect now of a Tory majority (or at least so close to one that Cameron can easily form a government on his own and no one can stop him).

    This means there are no seats in which it makes sense for reformers of any stripe to vote Tory.

    I don’t really believe your one-man campaign for a hung parliament has or will have any influence, but just in case I’m even a little bit wrong, would you please update your advice to reflect the changing reality?

  • Paul McKeown 2nd May '10 - 5:30pm

    I agree with Alec (Salmond that is)! Vote as you believe.

  • Andrew Suffield 3rd May '10 - 1:05pm

    “Hugh”‘s been running around posting “vote Tory!” to every other comment thread for months. Best to just ignore him.

    The popular vote is significant this time around, because electoral reform is so high on the agenda. That means there are no “wasted votes”; voting for a Lib Dem who can’t win is still building a clear case for proportional representation. Put all the old “tactical voting” nonsense away – that’s for Labour this time.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Helen Dudden
    With families going hungry and cold, as with the older and those unwell with disabilities. One doctors surgery in Bath, told their patients that only sick peop...
  • Martin
    There is very little mechanism for removing a Prime Minister or any Minister who has Lied or acted corruptly. With FPTP and an absolute majority it depends ult...
  • Jeff
    Malcolm Todd 24th May '22 - 6:55pm: The difference between “avoid” and “endeavour to avoid” can’t just be swept under the carpet… ...
  • Barry Lofty
    It is a sad reality that Johnson will probably survive Sue Gray,s inquiry but what a terrible situation our country faces in the midst of another crisis, left...
  • Roger Lake
    May I add a comment slightly off the point, made a few days ago in response to the call by Humphrey Hawksley on LDV for Weds 11th May, for a Lib Dem 'Big Idea'...