Why should an MP be allowed to veto a piece of legislation in secret?

Some bad old secrecy habits clearly still linger on in parts of the Conservative Party.

Step forward: Christopher Chope MP and his veto of a Bill to aid developing countries.

The Bill was at a stage where any one MP objecting to it would kill it off, and that’s what he did. In itself, of course it’s perfectly fair for an MP to view a Bill as being wrong. Myself, I’d change the weird way Parliamentary rules work to produce this power of veto,  but given it’s there I don’t hold it too much against an MP for using it.

But that doesn’t cover Christopher Chope’s actions.

You see: he vetoed the Bill and then tried to keep secret that it was he who vetoed it. Even when the question of who issued the veto was asked in Parliament, right in front of him, he kept silent.

His name has now been discovered (and you can read full details of the story here) but it shows just how rotten Parliament’s rules still are – and just how the old habits of secrecy and stuff the public’s right to know what MPs get up to in their jobs still linger on.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

2 Comments

  • GregoryHouse 16th Mar '10 - 2:30pm

    And he has lobbied MPs and their staff to try and block the building of a creche on the Parliamentary Estate.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Le Grice
    Weird that this appears to be the first LDV article about this, and the first time anyone in the parliamentary party has spoken up about it (as far as I'm aware...
  • Jack
    Delighted to see conference overwhelmingly reject the EHRC guidance (they don't deserve three quarters of that name - I accept they are a commission). People ar...
  • Geoff Reid
    Somebody had to say it eventual!y. Thank you Tom for inviting us to be honest on this matter....
  • Hywel
    Important point there Paul. For all the angst about 'lack of cut through' that has pretty much been the case for most of the time the LIb Dems existed except f...
  • Roland
    @Gwyn, I agree with David Raw about relative urgency. However, even in the list of political reforms, I would put changes to voting way below the changes that n...