Glasgow Labour councillor banned from public office over rape comments

Early last year I briefly reported on the shocking comments about the alleged rape of a child made by one of its Glasgow councillors, William O’Rourke.

The case has now finally worked its way through the system and he has been banned from holding public office:

A Glasgow Labour councillor has been banned from holding office over alleged comments he made about a case involving the alleged rape of a nine year old.

William O’Rourke, who represented the Greater Pollok ward, was suspended from the party last March after he allegedly suggested that the young victim may have been a willing participant and that the girl “wanted it to happen”.

O’Rourke is alleged to have made the comments at a personnel appeals committee hearing into the case after the care worker who was dismissed for allegedly having sex with the child, O’Rourke is said to have asked if the girl “wanted it to happen” because no force was used and that she was not a “typical innocent nine year old”.

He also made a comment about the child’s mother being a prostitute and went on what the Police Officer described as a ‘rant’ about promiscuous children and the need to lower the age of sexual consent.

Glasgow Labour were accused of closing ranks in order to protect O’Rourke after it emerged Baillies Jim Scanlan and Jim Todd were also present at the hearing, but had said nothing.

O’Rourke’s comments were only made public after a Strathclyde Police Officer who was a witness at the hearing reported concerns and an official complaint was lodged with the Standards Commission for Scotland, which regulates the behaviour of politicians.

UPDATE: Apologies, the story I quoted from above is a little misleading as in fact the Public Standards Commissioner concluded that O’Rourke had not broken the code of conduct. What happened was that the Labour Party nonetheless decided to ban him from standing as a Labour candidate for public office in future.

* Mark Pack is a member of the Federal Board and editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire. He is a candidate for Party President.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Interesting. We still have a Standards Commission for Scotland. In England we will shortly lose our Standards framework nationally, to be replaced by local (considerably weaker) arrangements. Under the new arrangements, no-one will be able to be banned from local government office. Before long we will have scandals breaking out because there is nothing we can do about those who persistently exceed the bounds of free speech, the bullies, and those who use local power cliques to protect them from effective action. Particularly interesting in this report that others in the Labour Party locally were accused of “closing ranks”. Any of us familiar with human behaviour know that is the tendency.

  • May one ask what is the point of this article?…Labour suspended the councillor almost a year ago

  • Sorry, Simon, the voting process is absolutely not the right process to deal with this. No-one could say that process is the best one to look at details of evidence objectively, it would become either a lynch mob, or a popularity contest about some of the possible local opponents of the councillor accused. If you are working, it is expected there is a fair disciplinary process in place. That shouldbe precisely the same for people who are elected. The fact that they got where they are through a process of election shouldn’t put them above the ability to hold them to account objectively.

    If you were accused, or if you were a concerned person in a local community with a ruling clique, would you want to have these thing decided by a byelection? Or by people selected for their understanding and knowledge of local government, objectivity, and personal distance from the situation being judged?

  • Richard Swales 8th Feb '12 - 7:48pm

    I totally agree with Simon McGrath, and I would add that he would be unlikely to get the Labour nomination.

  • A total idiot – but I agree with Frank Fisher. This was NOT a public meeting remember; the alleged comments were made at a personnel appeals committee.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBarry Lofty 11th Dec - 10:09am
    There is nothing wrong with having a policy that at least half of UK would love to happen ie the continued involvement with the EU....
  • User AvatarManfarang 11th Dec - 9:53am
    Peter Hirst What makes you think Britons living abroad cease to have contact with the UK? I was in the UK last month and what...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 11th Dec - 9:42am
    ‘The Liberal Democrats’ moderate message, with its admirable position on electoral reform, is compromised by the fantasy of revoking Brexit’ - Guardian editorial 11/12/19 What...
  • User Avatarfrankie 11th Dec - 7:36am
    Well of to Cheadle I must go. Wife is not happy apparently I should spend my leave with her not delivering leaflets.
  • User AvatarMichael BG 11th Dec - 2:30am
    James Baillie, Our policy is to “introduce a pilot scheme that involve(s) an unconditional payment of the standard Universal Credit allowance (currently £319 per month...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Dec - 1:01am
    @ Dennis Wake I suppose that is one theory. Another might be that the cost of nurses, doctors and teachers does rise as GDP rises....
Tue 7th Jan 2020