19-20 July 2025 – the weekend’s press releases

  • John Healey accused of misleading Parliament over Afghan data breach
  • Water pollution: People fed up with empty promises
  • Water ombudsman: We need fundamental change, not another layer of bureaucracy
  • 521 spills recorded at private sewage plants but 5 sites not even required to monitor spills

John Healey accused of misleading Parliament over Afghan data breach

The Liberal Democrats have said the Defence Secretary John Healey appears to have misled Parliament over the Afghan data breach – and must “urgently come before Parliament to answer the question of whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public”.

Only three days ago John Healey told MPs in the House of Commons that no serving member of the armed forces had been put at risk by the data loss. This comes despite it emerging yesterday that over 100 British officials, including members of the special forces and MI6, were compromised in a data breach.

Liberal Democrat Leader Ed Davey called on the Defence Secretary to urgently come to Parliament and correct the record.

Responding to a question from Liberal Democrat MP Defence Committee member Ian Roome on Tuesday 15 July, John Healey said: “To the best of my knowledge and belief, no serving member of our armed forces is put at risk by the data loss.”

Liberal Democrat Leader Ed Davey said:

Three days ago John Healey claimed no-one serving in the armed forces was put at risk by the data breach. Today we found out that appears to be false.

We need to know if any serving members of the armed forces were impacted – and the Defence Secretary must urgently come before Parliament to answer the question of whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public.

Liberal Democrat MP Ian Roome, who previously served in the RAF, added:

The Defence Secretary gave me his assurances just three days ago that no serving members of our armed forces were put at risk by this appalling data breach. I am very concerned to find out that this appears not to have been correct.

It is really important to restore public trust that he now clarifies his remarks. It is the least that our brave armed forces personnel along with the thousands of Afghans impacted deserve.

Water pollution: People fed up with empty promises

Responding to the Government’s announcement that it will cut water pollution by 2030 and deliver a “water revolution” Leader of the Liberal Democrats, Ed Davey MP said:

People are fed up with empty promises from ministers while Britain’s waterways continue to be ruined by sewage.

We need to see far more ambition from this government with an end to all sewage dumping in bathing waters by 2030.

This report must not be used as an excuse to kick the can down the road on immediate reforms. We need to see action now including replacing Ofwat with a tough new regulator to end this national scandal.

For years water companies have paid out millions in dividends and bonuses. It would be deeply unfair if customers are now made to pick up the tab for this scandal through higher bills.

Water ombudsman: We need fundamental change, not another layer of bureaucracy

Responding to the Government’s announcement of a new water ombudsman to support customers, Liberal Democrat Environment spokesperson Tim Farron MP said:

To effectively tackle the sewage scandal, we need fundamental change, not another layer of bureaucracy.

One of the reasons that the current system is failing is that there are too many weak regulators being played off by the powerful water companies.

A new water ombudsman may provide the possibility of redress for customers who for too long have been forced to foot the bill for failing water companies, while executives pocket extortionate bonuses.

Since 2022, the Liberal Democrats have been clear: Ofwat must go. If Ofwat remains in either name or nature, then the Government will have let the public down. Simply scrapping Ofwat but retaining a balkanised and weak regulatory framework will only be window dressing, so we are interested in the Government’s proposals but the jury is still out as to whether they’ll make much difference.

The sewage crisis has plagued our waterways for far too long, and we now need an effective, consolidated, powerful and independent body that finally holds water companies to account for the mess they’ve made.

521 spills recorded at private sewage plants but 5 sites not even required to monitor spills

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton has today revealed that the number of sewage spills recorded at sites operated by PFI companies rose to 521 last year.

A freedom of information request from Scottish Liberal Democrats has also revealed that five sites run by the companies are exempt from requirements to monitor sewage overflow events.

While most sewage overflows in Scotland are operated by Scottish Water, some are operated by PFI companies, with SEPA licensing PFI companies to operate sewage overflows at 12 locations, including the Seafield Sewage Treatment Works in Edinburgh.

Of these 12 licences, 5 (41.7%) do not contain any requirement to monitor the frequency and duration of sewage overflow events, leaving people in the dark as to the scale of sewage dumping at these sites.

Among the sites which provided data, there were 521 spills recorded, including 177 in Edinburgh, 153 in Whitburn, 90 in Blackburn, West Lothian, 60 in East Calder and 40 in Newbridge. At these sites sewage spilled for a cumulative 3,523 hours in 2024.

SEPA currently do not proactively publish what monitoring data does exist for these PFI managed sewage overflows so this data can only be obtained through freedom of information requests at present. In its report into sewage dumping in Scotland, Environmental Standards Scotland (ESS) called on SEPA to proactively publish data from PFI overflows. Following further pressure from the Liberal Democrats, SEPA have now committed to begin proactively publishing this data in the autumn.

Alex Cole-Hamilton said:

Scotland’s sewage crisis stinks.

Not only are PFI companies routinely dumping sewage into Scotland’s waters, SEPA does not even require many of them to monitor how often sewage is being dumped.

Scots will rightly be concerned that they are not being given the full picture about this disgusting practice, we need to see all of these PFI overflows monitored. Scottish ministers need to stop their excuses and get tough on sewage dumping.

To turn the tide on this crisis Scottish Liberal Democrats have published plans for a Clean Water Act that would see a new blue flag system for Scotland’s rivers, as well as vital updates to our sewage network and a clamp down on discharges.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News, Press releases and Scotland.
Advert

2 Comments

  • David Evans 21st Jul '25 - 8:29am

    The problem with the water industry is that the organisations who have taken over the water companies, have developed a financial structure solely designed to extract as much money from the industry as possible, at minimal risk to those involved.

    The private equity model of business is always the same
    Step 1) Take over a well know entity with lots of public support (either statutory or nostalgic). This is your cash cow.
    Step 2) Lend it lots of money at high interest rates from elsewhere in the private equity group. This allows you to take money out with a veneer of legitimacy which would be much more difficult to take out as profits/dividends – i.e. Milk the cow.
    Step 3) Set up all the profitable bits as separate companies, sell to other parts of the Private equity group. Increase charges to the main company to further reduce its profits. i.e. Carve up the cow and then loosely stitch it back together (but keep it on life support)
    Step 4) Use the lack of profits to justify price increases i.e. capture the regulator
    Step 5) Borrow huge amounts of money from other parts of the private equity market at ever increasing rates of interest secured on assets of the business if necessary i.e. Pawn the cow’s future earnings.
    Step 6) When things get desperate sell off the profitable parts (e.g. land, buildings) and lease back short term i.e. Sell off the cow shed and the farm house.

  • David Evans 21st Jul '25 - 8:37am

    Step 7) When things get really desperate make things so bad as to force the government to act and run a publicity campaign saying how good you will be if only … Then wait for bail out or re-nationalisation. Quids in again!! i.e. Sell the corpse of old cow back to the state which hasn’t got the physical assets needed to carry out the task.

    Trying to regulate the water industry while allowing these structures to remain in place is like trying to regulate the problems in Syria now that rule of law has collapsed. A new tougher regulator in itself will achieve very little because it has no power over companies teetering on the edge of a self-created cliff. Water cannot be allowed to fail and without mechanisms to prevent the threat of deliberate failure, we will continue to bail out the financial sharks with ever increasing levels of public subsidy.

    Wizard government wheezes like reducing charges to poorer customers by allowing richer ones to be charged more is simply hiding the problem and dumping it on the people of this country. Ultimately all the gains will continue to go to the mega rich private equity sharks while government averts its eyes and runs away from the problem. Labour will do this as soon as blink. We must not give them a free pass on this.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Ben Wood
    It is such sad news. I was lucky to get to know Micheal over the last few years (working on a book project for the John Stuart Mill Institute). He reaffirmed fo...
  • Ed Sanderson
    Very sad news. I remember many a lively evening of erudite discussion in Leeds - Michael was a true intellect - and a genuinely warm soul. My condolences to his...
  • Jack
    This is bang on. What is the point of a liberal party that won't stand up for rights, especially when both government and opposition want to make hay out of div...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    I totally understand this is a key issue for many Lib Dems (and I'm not speaking for Lib Dems myself, I'm an ex-member). But I don't understand how this 'vangua...
  • John Grout
    Fully agree with all of this. I've seen a few MPs' Pride Month posts reference Section 28 abolition and Same-Sex Marriage - we need to start talking about this...