Mark Pack

42 million signatures on Pakistani petition against terrorism

By | Tue 5th August 2008 - 11:47 am

It’s gone unremarked in the media here, but a huge online petition is being run in Pakistan against terrorism. Started by the Yeh Hum Naheen (YHN) Foundation, a Pakistani NGO, it is currently growing at the rate of more than a million signatures a day, assisted by a mix of offline and online campaigning, including several thousand people around the country gathering signatures on sheets of paper, a high profile website and the ability for people to sign the petition via text message.

The straplines for the campaign are interesting, as they are clearly aimed in part at addressing support for terrorism from within Muslim communities:

Are we the ones … who turn hopes into misery?
Are we the ones … who deprive children of their fathers’ affection?
Are we the ones … who deprive mothers of their children?

(Although all online petitions are vulnerable to the occassional dodgy signature, the overall scale of support for the campaign seems credible given the steps being taken to validate signatures and the large volume of media coverage for the campaign.)

The lack of coverage for this massive campaign in the UK media raises some interesting questions. Looking for example at Google News UK for stories on the petition, a search today for “Yeh Hum Naheen petition” produced ten stories, all for Pakistani or Indian news outlets, and no story from a UK media outlet. It’s not as if Muslims and terrorism is a story the UK media is usually not interested in, but this is one that hasn’t yet got their attention.

Hat-tip: PoliticsOnline.com (At the time of writing, their email on the subject isn’t up on their website) 

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Rob Blackie 6th Aug '08 - 10:31am

    Wow – what an amazing story.

    Actually it does look as if the Guardian have briefly covered this online.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @Jeff - I didn’t say resources were scarce, just that they are in short supply. So whilst there might be decades of fossil fuels in the ground, you may have n...
  • Paul R
    It might be better to spend the money on increased assistance to help people switch to EVs instead. Otherwise motorists will always be dependent on the next war...
  • Michael BG
    Nigel Jones, “When we debated FPC’s planned program last year, some said we should have included tax issues in that program” Indeed. I didn’t s...
  • Suzanne Fletcher
    Far too late for me to comment, but just skimmed through the replies and I agree with most. Most important is that as Caron says, it was announced where hundre...
  • Robyn Peel
    A key difference between the Liberal Democrats and other parties is that members go in their own right, not as representatives of their local party; we have att...