Climate change dangers show why Liberal Democrats are needed in government

Next week the fate of the world is going to be decided. That is a statement that we have rarely, if ever, been able to say with any certainty. But the consequences of another year, five years or decade without a global climate change agreement in the form of a legally binding treaty on all major global polluters could see the progress of degradation accelerate to a point where any further action would be mostly damage control. That is the solemn mandate of the Paris Cop21 Climate Conference, co-operate or face consequences, consequences that will be more tangible than ever before.

As global temperature rise being successfully held at 2 degrees Celsius looks more and more improbable, and unprecedented ice-cap melt (like that of Greenland in 2012) continues to stun Arctic communities and swell the global oceans, the level of climate disruption is now undeniably enormous. Even the kind of serious concerted action we all hope for in Paris will not be enough for those who are already set to face the horrors of the degree of environmental disruption we have now made inevitable. The most striking case of all? The chain of Pacific islands that form the state of Kiribati. Climate scientists have suggested that by 2100, or even earlier, rising sea levels will result in the full submersion of the islands.

This will be a decisive moment in human history. At this point our human capacity for destruction will have been fully realised, we will have effectively destroyed an entire nation. Global leaders in Paris who think that at their feet is placed an impossible and sobering task should be reminded of just how sobering a task lies at the feet of Anote Tong, Kiribati’s President, who every year must plan for the future awaiting a people who will lose the very land they call home to the sea, on account of our actions.

For Liberal Democrats, there’s a serious concern that goes beyond the outcome of Paris. In six short months since May, we have seen the reversal of some of Ed Davey’s most significant strides forward in environment policy in UK history. The scrapping of the wind energy subsidy, as well as of ground-breaking carbon capture infrastructure, is seemingly just the early indication of intent of a Conservative government with all the green credentials of a global oil conglomerate. Simply responding on a case by case basis to these travesties will not be enough, we have to spark an internal debate and rediscover the environmental radicalism that led the party in 1997 to propose “…to shift taxation from jobs, wealth and goods to pollution and the depletion of natural resources”.

Why? Because as Paris is about to prove, environmental policy is no longer a secondary issue. It is about to be thrown into the frontline of public opinion, and the Lib Dems have to provide the unique leadership on the environment they have in the past if we are serious about getting back into government. The situation will evolve year by year and hazardous climate events will become more frequent. Across our island nation, people are waking up to the fact that the floods, droughts and storms at home and abroad that blight our lives and economy are as pressing a problem as inequality, debt and global terrorism. No issue highlights better the desperate need for the fightback to bring the party back to power soon than the ticking time bomb that is our environment.

* Guy Russo was the Parliamentary Candidate in Enfield North at the General Election and is an Ex-President of the Queen Mary University of London Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • PHIL THOMAS 27th Nov '15 - 1:24pm

    Tories gain seat from Lib Dems in Salisbury yesterday. That’s what happened as being part of a Govt ?

  • What unprecedented ice cap melt is that?

    The Antarctic ice is at an unprecedented high, breaking all records and the Arctic has recovered to the level of thirty years ago.

  • > “The scrapping of the wind energy subsidy…”
    If you had read the source documents, you would know that the fundamental issue was the levy on our energy bills – around £200 pa on typical household bills into the future to fund the subsidies already committed to. So yes we can continue subsidising wind and solar voltaic, but only by placing another levy on everyone’s energy bills to create the funds necessary to pay the subsidies…

    Additionally, you would know that the government lost it’s case in the ECJ to treat the deployment of energy efficiency schemes such as solar panels as a social project and hence subject to VAT at 5% and not 20%; Currently the
    UK government are defying the ECJ judgement, but the question has to be for how long…

    About the only credible question currently is over the governments delay in signing necessary agreements to enable the Swansea tidal bay project to go ahead.; currently this project has slipped by a year with no end to the delays. in sight.

    Finally, I question whether the LibDems would actually make a positive contribution, given their commitment to mass net immigration and building of millions of new homes and associated energy consuming infrastructure such as HS2…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Andy Daer
    One good thing about Brexit is that the Leave team are in government, and will have to keep trying to show what a great thing it is. Perhaps this is motivating...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Little Jackie Piper "I will be very interested to see whether the EU will follow precedent and demand a supermajority and minimum turnout should Scottish ho...
  • Hannah Giovanna Daws
    They should be prosponed until September, but the government will resist tooth-and-nail until then. I don't see how we safely do a paper count - I'd certainl...
  • Barry Lofty
    I can empathise with your position Lorenzo having lived above our leasehold business and bringing up our family there, it was home although some neighbours made...
  • Mario Caves
    "Our Leader does not decide Policy, unlike Labour & the Tories we decide our Policy at Conference." Exactly. Who was Ed Davey speaking to? He wasn't spe...