aring doesn’t STOP at 67- so why should Carer’s Support Payment or Carer’s Allowance

My husband and I are not typical empty nesters. True, we have a daughter of 27 and a son of 23, but Archie has a learning disability and autism so he will never live independently. He requires constant attention and all our energy to manage his behaviour. Evenings and weekends are full on for us as he needs his exercise (usually swimming or a hike) meals, medication and bathing- none of which he can manage himself without support. We liken it to having a 23-year-old toddler Tigger bouncing about the house.

Now in our late fifties, with a wee bit more disposable income, we can’t help but be envious as our peers pop down to the pub, disappear off in their campers or go on a city break. An evening out or a holiday for us takes meticulous planning and come with the extra anxiety of whether the wonderful paid carers, without whom we couldn’t survive, will cope with him while we are not there.

My husband and I have vowed to keep Archie living at home with us as long as we are able. We hope that this will be for very many years to come. I took early retirement from teaching to care for him when he left school. I supplement my reduced Teacher’s Pension with Carer’s Support Payment. Without that, in this cost-of-living crisis, I may have to return to work and we would have to strongly consider putting Archie in full-time residential care.

Scotland’s 800,000 Unpaid Carers, like myself, save the Scottish Government an estimated £18 billion. We have an aging population and without us the already overwhelmed Social Care sector would implode. Yet it may surprise some to learn that once we are in receipt of State Pension that Carer’s Support Payment (and Carers’ Allowance south of the border) STOPS. Simply put both are classed as benefits.

But caring doesn’t STOP at 67 so why should we STOP getting a little extra money?

I was proud to represent the Scottish Liberal Democrats at several Carers’ Hustings during the Scottish Elections. Sir Ed Davey and Wendy Chamberlain MP have done much to highlight the need to support all Britain’s carers. Our daughter was a young carer, and I am relieved that they are getting more support with their education and meaningful respite breaks away from caring and learning.

We now need to turn our attention to supporting Scotland and Britain’s older carers. Many continue caring, like us, due to through love and dedication to their vulnerable loved ones. We will still be attending to all Archie’s needs. We won’t STOP caring for him.

But it’s not just about getting meaningful breaks away from caring and our physical and mental health. It’s about valuing us and recognising our contribution to society.

Not stopping carers’ benefits at 67 will go some way to doing this.

* Amanda Clark is an unpaid Carer and member of Perth and Kinross Lib Dems

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mick Taylor
    There is some right old nonsense talked about tax rates. In my youth some people could pay up to 98% on their income above a threshold. People talked about leav...
  • Jana
    Keynes was very clear that government intervention was required, using monetary or fiscal policy, if Aggregate Demand was less than Aggregate Supply. Do we b...
  • Abrial Jerram
    Peter Martin I don't see that MMT here isn't telling us anything that we didn't know already, borrowing/creating money and investing it very well in a dynamic w...
  • Abrial Jerram
    @Tanya Park I think the difference here is I don't see the second purpose as necessary, as long as we have sorted out the problem of deprivation and we have pro...
  • Tanya Park
    @Abrial, I'd say both motives are valid and work together rather than one displacing the other. Taxing extreme wealth to fund a sufficient floor for everyone is...