Enough is enough: Women and girls deserve better

 We are sick and tired of being told by those in power that tackling violence against women and girls is a priority, while women and girls continue to be failed by the very systems that are supposed to protect them.

The case of Simon Levy is yet another devastating reminder of what can happen when warning signs are missed, information is not properly acted upon, and agencies responsible for protecting the public fail to learn from previous mistakes.

This cannot continue to be treated as a series of isolated incidents.

For years, women have been told that lessons are being learned. We have heard commitments to tackling violence against women and girls, improving police responses, strengthening the criminal justice system and better protecting victims. Yet too often, the same failures emerge again and again.

By the time Bibaa Henry and Nicole Smallman were murdered by a stranger in a London park, Levy had reportedly already been offending for years. By the time Sarah Everard was murdered by a serving Metropolitan Police officer, Levy had been offending for even longer. His first conviction came in 2021, yet further serious offences followed.

The question we have to ask is simple: when will enough be enough?

Women should not have to wait for another tragedy before institutions examine what went wrong. Nor should responsibility simply be passed between the police, the Crown Prosecution Service and probation services, with each failure treated as an individual mistake rather than part of a wider systemic problem.

The prosecution described Levy’s victims as vulnerable women, and told the court that Levy believed targeting women in these circumstances would make it more likely that he could get away with his crimes.

Vulnerability should never mean that a woman is less likely to receive justice or protection.

Women experiencing homelessness, addiction, mental ill health, exploitation, poverty or other forms of vulnerability are not less deserving of protection. In many circumstances, their vulnerability can place them at greater risk of violence and exploitation.

This is why Liberal Democrat Women are calling for real systemic change across policing, the CPS and probation services throughout the UK.

That must include:

  • Better information-sharing between agencies, so that warning signs and patterns of offending are not missed.
  • Robust and consistent risk assessment, particularly where there is a history of violence, sexual offending or predatory behaviour.
  • Properly resourced specialist services capable of supporting victims and identifying patterns of abuse and exploitation.
  • Effective supervision of offenders, with clear accountability when risk is not appropriately managed.
  • Independent scrutiny and transparency when serious failures occur.
  • Meaningful implementation of recommendations from reviews and investigations, with progress monitored rather than allowing reports to disappear into the system.

We also need to change the culture surrounding violence against women and girls.

Too often, the focus is placed on the behaviour, circumstances or perceived vulnerability of the victim rather than on the actions of the perpetrator and the responsibilities of the institutions involved.

We cannot keep telling women to change how they live their lives to stay safe while failing to change the systems that are supposed to protect them.

For the Liberal Democrats, tackling violence against women and girls must mean more than political statements following another tragedy. It must mean sustained investment, effective prevention, proper accountability and a criminal justice system that recognises the patterns of violence and exploitation that women face.

Women and girls deserve more than promises that lessons will be learned. They deserve to see those lessons translated into action.

As Liberal Democrat Women, we will continue to challenge institutional failures and push for the systemic changes needed to make women and girls safer.

In addition, we will be asking Marie Goldman MP to contact Satvir Kaur MP, Minister for Safeguarding, directly to raise our concerns. We want to ensure that the issues highlighted are escalated at ministerial level and receive the attention they urgently require.

The Government has repeatedly told women that tackling violence against women and girls is a priority.

Now it is time to prove it.

Enough is enough.

 

 

* Liberal Democrat Women is hte official organisation representing women in the Liberal Democrats

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Quite right. Women are over half the electorate. Could not women vote to remove MPs and others who do lip service but don’t take action?
    That’s what the independent pro Gaza MPs did at the 2924 GE to remove MPs who didn’t support Gaza.
    Perhaps LDW could think about how that could be achieved in 2029 and by-elections between now and then?

  • When I was younger, I used to think that the discrimination women face was sometimes blown out of proportion.
    As I got older, aimed for bigger positions, and eventually entered politics, I realised something very different: the fight to keep women from climbing the ladder is very real.
    Of course, when you’re at the bottom of the ladder, you don’t necessarily feel the resistance as much. It’s only when you start climbing — when you enter rooms where decisions are made, challenge established ways of thinking, and occupy positions traditionally dominated by men — that you begin to see just how deeply entrenched it is.
    One of the most frustrating experiences is being asked for your opinion, only to realise that it was never genuinely intended to influence the decision. You are invited into the room, consulted, perhaps even applauded for being there — but ultimately, the decisions remain in the hands of the same old boys’ club.
    The violence and discrimination women experience is perpetuated by attitudes that teach some men that women exist to serve them rather than to stand beside them as equal human beings.
    That requires more than policies. It requires a cultural overhaul.
    Women should not be brought into boardrooms as a symbol, a photo opportunity, or to tick a box. We should be there because we represent half of the population — and, in a very real sense, half of society’s interests and contribution.

  • I agree with Sam it is a much wider and insidious problem than cannot be solved by superb services and policies alone. It goes back to how we educate young people. There is something very unsettling about how teenage boys behave in public spaces. At that age they already think they own the world. Or that is how it looks to me.

  • @Meg Thomas
    “ It goes back to how we educate young people.”

    I would say that it is not just about how schools educate young people but how schools respond to young people who are violent on a regular basis. The best schools are now using evidence-informed Pupil Risk Assessments with appropriate mitigations in place to prioritise the safety of other pupils and staff. Young people need to be educated that violence is unacceptable and, should that not have the desired effect, face the restrictions that result from the requirement to prioritise the safety of everyone else.

  • Nonconformistradical 12th Aug '26 - 3:32pm

    What makes young people violent in the first place?

  • @Nonconformistradical
    “What makes young people violent in the first place?

    This is the nature/ nurture question. Some think people are born ‘good’ and then go ‘bad’ as a result of trauma. Others, myself included, believe that babies are born neither ‘good’ or ‘bad’ but quickly learn strategies in life to get them what they need and want. Good parenting will address any sort of violent behaviour early on so it doesn’t become an embedded tactic – when this doesn’t happen, children will grow with this as a go t strategy to use as they feel necessary. By the time children are at school, it may already be too late to address fully and it is just a case of trying to limit or control.

  • Peter Hirst 31st Aug '26 - 1:31pm

    I agree and we need to start earlier. Relationship lessons throughout primary and secondary education would plant the seeds that would germinate when circumstances demand. More cross gender experiences at a young age would also help foster respect and understanding of challenging issues that arise later.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    "According to the headline in yesterday’s ‘Daily Telegraph’ (28 August) : “Ed Davey refuses to rule out Tory pact”." More deafening silence! Well,...
  • Peter Hirst
    If the political make up of the eu changes significantly would we be better to have stayed in? It probably depends whether you are more interested in global or ...
  • Mrs Rita Baker
    I agree with everything in this post. We need a national message as well as local ones. As I am currently disabled, waiting for a hip replacement and knee opera...
  • Peter Hirst
    An agreement with other countries to coordinate action when their interests collide would be a useful addition to the array of groups, organisations and bodies ...
  • Peter Hirst
    Our political strategy as I understand it does not make it easy for us to have a single message that gives us the publicity we need. We can talk about empowerme...