My weekend at the Edinburgh fringe continued with Iain Dale’s All Talk event with the Leader of the Green Party of England and Wales, Zack Polanski.
I’m usually one of the younger people at Iain Dale’s shows. This time I felt positively geriatric. The audience was very young. The event didn’t have to be moved to the bigger theatre, like Nicola Sturgeon’s earlier that day, but the smaller theatre was full.
Polanski talked about his decision to change his name to one that reflects his Jewish heritage. He had thought originally that his family had changed their surname because of the persecution they faced in Nazi Germany. In fact, he said, it was because of anti-semitism in the UK.
He also talked about the tensions of his childhood and the impact of his parents’ messy divorce had on him.
I found it quite strange that someone who has barely been out of the public eye in the past year spent a good while whinging, Lib Dem style, about the Greens not getting decent media coverage. He said that he was frequently booked to appear on shows, cancelled at the last minute and the same stations would run stories about how he had disappeared. He did say that Sky and LBC (two of the biggest broadcasters in the UK) were better at giving them a fairer amount of coverage, which feels like more than we get.
The impact of being in the public eye, though, had taken its toll on him and his partner. He talked about his housemates being worried for their safety because of his presence and his decision not to go on the electoral roll because he was worried about his address being circulated to all political parties. It is awful that any politician should have that sort of fear and that those around them felt threatened.
They had quite a sensible conversation about the gender identity issue. Iain Dale mentioned that when he interviewed prominent “gender critical” campaigner Kathleen Stock that she was unable to give any evidence of trans women causing a problem in women’s toilets which makes his own views on the issue perhaps surprising. Zack was robust and reasonable in describing the impact of the new EHRC Code on trans people for no gain for anyone else. They did talk about the increasing amount of targeting of certain groups of people. Zack Polanski expressed solidarity with Wes Streeting, who had earlier said that he had had more homophobic abuse online since he had become defence secretary than he had had at all before.
I was a bit surprised that the Green leader did his usual talking up of wealth taxes, but didn’t back it up with the why, didn’t cite the many resources that suggest that more equal societies are happier.
He’s all in favour of spending more on defence – as long as the costs of tackling climate change are included in that, rather than it being done at the behest of Donald Trump.
Given that the event was going to be a podcast listenable to for all time, I don’t think Polanski used it to its full potential, to break out of the Green bubble and attract more supporters. He is not alone in that mindset, as anyone who reads my constructive feedback to our own party will know, but breakthroughs, if they are to last, depend on building a much wider group of people willing to vote for you.
That said, he clearly has the support of a younger audience, and I don’t see enough effort in this party at trying to do something about that. We have a mountain of policy that should appeal to younger people and would undoubtedly make their lives better – on housing, human rights, cost of living, employment opportunities – but we don’t talk to them nearly enough, if at all.
Unfortunately, we didn’t get to chat to him afterwards as he had to rush off to catch a train.
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social




9 Comments
LBC certainly gives us more coverage than other radio stations.
Polanski support is tumbling. He is rated almost as low as Farage in the latest IPSOS survey.
We should give him no publicity and indeed we need to be hammering him hard about all his eccentric views and behaviour.
Expect the Greens will replace him next year he is a liability to them.
@theakes I don’t think Zack Polanski has any intention of expanding his base beyond Corbynites, which is no issue for him as in over doubling the membership through this he has essentially secured his bid for reelection when the time comes.
This of course will cost the Greens ability to reach a wider segment of the electorate, but even though he has rapidly declined in popularity he still has the boast that they’re doing better than in 2024, and that will be enough for a lot of the members.
You are correct re talking to the young or rather NOT talking enough to them.THEY. They are the future electorate AND possible recruits .MORE effort must be put in talking to them
But we have to attack them and not be generous in any way otherwise they will eventually see us off under different leadership.
@ theakes “But we have to attack them”…… But that assumes anybody is even listening to the Lib Dems these days…………. Most of the time there seems to be no cut through.
Incidentally, why not a full blooded attack on Brexit and a re-join campaign. That would certainly capture the mood and comments I overheard when standing for 45 minutes in a queue to get into Portugal at Customs/passports a couple of weeks ago. If Sir Edward won’t/can’t do it, there’s a pretty obvious answer.
Thanks Caron for a clear view of the interview for those of us who didn’t see it. He doesn’t seem to be helping his cause.
This week 2 excellent gains one from Reform and 3 defections from Labour, Greens and Cons.
Someone is listening? Why do we not have a press gathering with the 5 and tell the world.
Your last point is the one that stays with me. I employ young people, and their worries are not really separate issues, they are one question: whether this generation gets a fair deal at all. The Greens ask young people to join a cause. We start from how someone actually lives, the job, the rent, the bus, whether anyone in power listens to them, and that is the more serious answer. Yet they win the room and we do not, which says the gap is in how we talk, not what we believe. Looking at the Brighton agenda I can’t see a discussion on that anywhere, beyond the Young Liberals’ welcome recruitment motion. Perhaps there should be one?