5 Days to Power: could there have been a Lab-Lib Dem deal?

Conservative MP Rob Wilson’s book on the formation of a coalition government in May 2010, 5 Days to Power: The Journey to Coalition Britain, plays up the drama of the events, talking of how “Gordon Brown and David Cameron were both determined to do whatever was necessary to secure the position of Prime Minister” as if the story is one of a cliff-hanging drama which could have gone either way.

Whilst the outcome is certainly significant for British political history, what the book is far less convincing on is that there was really any serious chance of a Labour – Lib Dem deal that would have kept David Cameron out of 10 Downing Street. Neither Wilson’s book, nor its sister book published at the same time – 22 Days in May by Lib Dem MP David Laws (reviewed here), offers a convincing alternative sequence of events which could have delivered a Labour PM once the election results came in.

5 Days to Power - book coverThe obstacles to a Labour – Lib Dem deal were threefold. First, the election results made the Parliamentary arithmetic for such a deal extremely tough. “It became a regular refrain at the telephone conversations and meetings between Clegg and Brown that whatever Brown said, Clegg would respond by drawing attention to ‘the sheer unforgiving political reality’ of the figures’,” Wilson records.

Second, the decisions people in Labour had made over the previous three years to elect and then stick with Gordon Brown had left their party with a leader that others were extremely wary of trying to make a deal with. As Laws puts it in his own book, “If his own Cabinet colleagues cannot work with him, what chance do four or five Lib Dem ministers have?”

Third, as has come out in all the accounts so far, Labour were badly unprepared for talks, with divisions within their own negotiating team, their team not speaking for all the key figures and little in the way of preparation over what policy areas were up for negotiation.

As Wilson recounts,

Ed Balls’ experience of Labour’s preparations for a hung parliament, or lack of them, is perhaps the most instructive. The first that Balls, one of Brown’s closest and most long-standing allies, heard of the fact that a Labour negotiating team would hold talks with the Liberal Democrats – and that he was part of the team – was when Brown called him late on Saturday morning, with the meeting due at 3pm. It was only on the drive down to London from Yorkshire that Balls found out who else was in the negotiating team … The pre-meeting briefing with Mandelson consisted of a conversation as Balls bought a cup of tea in Portcullis House and the pair walked to the lifts.

All three of those factors were set by 10pm on polling day. As a result, Wilson’s book – as with that of Laws – is an entertaining and interesting read but as a book that only briefly touches on the prior events which set the scene, it is not one that explains why a coalition government came to be. The explanations for that lie in events prior to Friday May 7th, which is when Wilson’s book really gets going. For those explanations you need a longer historical perspective – and who knows quite how far back you have to go in Gordon Brown’s case to explain why he ended up a senior politician that so many were so wary of being able to work with yet almost none in Labour were willing to say ‘no’ to him being leader? Perhaps even as far back as the Labour politics of the 1990s.

Where Rob Wilson’s book is weakest is in its attempts to either dramatise events (suggesting there was a real chance Brown could have stayed on) or in trying to paint a picture of Nick Clegg as being keener on a deal with the Conservatives for ideological reasons rather than because of the circumstances. In that vein, he suggests that the exclusion of Vince Cable, generally seen as warmer to Labour, from the Lib Dem negotiating team is evidence, but in doing so he glosses over the voluntary decision by both Clegg and Laws to have Paddy Ashdown, also generally seen as warmer to Labour, as one of the key advisors, frequently turned to during the days after the election.

Where the book is strongest is in the sense it gives of how emotions flowed back and forth over the days, not always for wholly logical reasons in hindsight, as the negotiations took different turns. Though the book is not exactly politically even-handed (it is by a Conservative MP and, look, it is Cameron who gets by far the most praise of the party leaders), it is much fairer than a simple political polemic. Other points of view get their look in and the book is far better for that.

You can buy 5 Days to Power by Rob Wilson and 22 Days in May by David Laws (reviewed by me here) from Amazon.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Books and Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • I am sure all Labour MPs say to themselves every night

    ‘ Thank God its not us having to make these cuts’

    Of course they did not want coalition. They knew it would destroy their party.

    ( may do the same to ours – but that’s the price of Power and responsibility. )

  • I put this book on my Christmas list last week as a suggestion for my children (age 20 and 22). I think it will be a lot better than socks, cans of beer I don’t like, or the latest after-shave concoction.

  • I think there should be some credit to those Labour figures like Mandelson, Alan Johnson, Brown, Alexander and Hain who tried to protect society’s most vulnerable by keeping Cameron and Osborne out. Alas, no such thing can be said of eg John Reid, David Blunkett and Andy Burnham.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRoger Billins 21st Jul - 10:05am
    It is annoying and stupid to stay our vote held up at Bury, at 3%. This is not a propaganda sheet aimed at children. With...
  • User AvatarP.J. 21st Jul - 9:41am
    @Callum Robertson I am not aware of any poling been done and that is why I said IMO. MO comes from knocking on hundreds of...
  • User AvatarFiona 21st Jul - 9:35am
    Alex, I get what you are saying, and yes, what Labour did was far more damaging, and it isn't accurate or fair to say we...
  • User AvatarP.J. 21st Jul - 9:27am
    @Wera 'using the empty houses 'we’ve' already got' When did my property become jointly owned. Since when did the LibDems endorse taking private property into...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 21st Jul - 9:14am
    I'm not sure I believed this Guardian article at the time but it is looking much more like Natalie Nougayrède was quite right now. The...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 21st Jul - 8:35am
    @william fowler. "Giving private tenants almost confiscatory rights". There you go again, distorting what was said and echoing the Tory right wing press. As I...