A couple of years back, I was moved to write to the BBC complaining about Question Time’s pro-Tory bias, regularly featuring Tory-supporting journalists alongside Tory MPs.
Well, that’ll learn me to be careful what you wish for. Because what do we have to look forward to on tonight’s QT panel? The following: an official Labour representative (Lord Falconer), and two former Labour MPs (Clare Short and George Galloway); and, for balance, an official Tory representative (Theresa May), and professional right-wing agitpropette (Melanie Phillips). Deep joy.
As Love and Liberty’s Alex Wilcock acerbically notes:
It’s not as if the Liberal Democrats have anything distinctive to contribute about tonight’s topics of Iraq and electoral reform. I’m sorry, what?
And as House of Twits’ Luke Richards points out:
This is not just an injustice to the Liberal Democrats, the decision to drop the Lib Dems from the panel will severely undermine the quality and value of tonight’s debate.
Luke also makes the point that it’s not the first time the BBC has pulled this trick: Lib Dem MP Jo Swinson was dumped in the week the Iraq inquiry started: apparently, as Lib Dem blogger Mark Thompson exclaimed, the BBC regards the Lib Dems as part of “the central political consensus”. Which is a bizarrely subjective judgement for a supposedy impartial broadcaster to make.
Anyway, there’s no point just getting cross by shouting at the TV screen or the Internet. Jonny Oates, the Lib Dems’ Director of Communications, has already outlined here on LDV what Lib Dems need to do when blatant media bias rears its head. So don’t get angry, get complaining (phone number and online form here).
PS: Mark Thomspon will be hosting his weekly BBC QT live chat over at his Mark Reckons blog – you can join in the conversation here.
16 Comments
Complaint duly sent. Utterly outragous that once again we were excluded from the panel when the Iraq Inquiry was likely to be a major topic of debate.
I think either Short or Galloway would have been acceptable but both to the exclusion of a Lib Dem is just plain biased.
My complaint:
On a Question Time where the main topics covered were the Chilcott Enquiry into the war in Iraq and electoral reform, I was dismayed yet again to see no representation from the Liberal Democrats, the third biggest political party in the UK, with over 20% of the vote share at the last General Election.
The Lib Dems have a unique position on Iraq having opposed it from the start, and similarly a unique on electoral reform having proposed it for decades. Is their opinion, and their electoral support, not worth hearing? I accept that Claire Short is an interesting figure in this debate as a former member of the Iraq Cabinet, and that Galloway’s minimal public support does come from his condemnation of Iraq. However, their public support even combined is minimal, so a decision to include both but exclude a representative from the Liberal Democrats is hard to support.
Theresa May had nothing to add to the debate, coming from a party who supported the Iraq war and oppose real electoral reform, the same position as the Labour party represented by Lord Falconer. Similarly, the right-wing Islamophobic demagogue Melanie Phillips did not make a useful contribution.
I hope this persistent bias from the BBC on the Question Time panel will be addressed for good.
Falconer pretends that having legal advice that something is legal is a defence. Sorry, Lord Falconer. Shirley Porter ran that argument and the House of Lords rejected it.
Blair and Falconer knew there were no weapons of mass destruction. Blair and Falconer knew the war was illegal under international law. Next they will try to tell us that it was vital to national security to kill Dr David Kelly, and doubtless Blair will insist with a straight face (onions to the ready) that Prime Ministers do sometimes have to make terrible decisions on occasions (when they are told to by Dick Cheney), and that he sincerely believes that what he did was right. The man is nothing if not a class act.
BTW, how much loot has Bliar bagged since leaving No 10?
Complaint sent – just so frustrating when many of us are working so hard in the run up to the local and general elections in May.
Ah well action day tomorrow – i’ll have knock on an extra 100 doors to compensate
I recently tried to get the BBC to reveal its methodology for allocating appearances on QT between the political parties. They refused to answer, claiming that this information was exempt from FoI legislation. The BBC uses ‘editorial independence’ as a cloak to avoid being accountable to anyone for blatant bias. Disgraceful for our national public service broadcaster.
So far as QT is concerned, the BBC website is also guilty of bias.
The panel for the programme now has five members. Details of previous programmes are available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006t1q9. This gives a list of programmes with details of some participants and from this page you can click through to each one. There seems to be a policy of often leaving out the Liberal Democrat from this page.
For recent programmes, the listings on this page have been as follows:
Basildon – Culture Secretary Ben Bradshaw, Tory peer Lord Lawson and journalist Jane Moore were listed, but not Jenny Tonge or Douglas Murray.
Milton Keynes – Liam Byrne MP, Caroline Spelman MP, Richard Madeley and Andrew Roberts were listed, but not Sarah Teather.
Finchley – all five participants were listed, including Chris Huhne.
Wootton Bassett – there were six participants of whom five were listed – Piers Morgan was the one to be left out on this occasion.
I can’t see why they don’t just list all participants. If they leave someone out a decision has been made – and how is that decision made?
I expect the content of that page is merely an example of incompetence, not bias. The BBC website does not receive the same level of care as their production efforts, and it frequently shows up like this. (The BBC news website often has spelling errors in their headlines when the stories are first posted – do some work, editors!)
My gripe is not just that we often get left out, but that they often leave us out from programmes that are filmed in an area where the party is strong. This might not matter to the viewing public at home, but to those who turn up and presumably the press coverage of the programme before and after, by leaving us out when a large percentage of the audience will vote for us and hold Lib Dem views seems barmy. It also means the BBC is inadvertently undermining our credibility locally. One example I remember fairly recently was excluding us from the programme filmed in Aberystwyth when we have the local MP (all because they wanted to include Plaid instead) and there was another (where, I can’t remember) where we run both the local council and have the MP and they didn’t include us.
When they came to Watford last year there was no LibDem on the panel, but we did get the seemingly ever-present Baroness Warsi and Melanie Phillips – and a bishop!
I am writing to formally complain about what I see as political bias against the Liberal Democrats on Question Time (broadcast last night 4th February).
As I’m sure the BBC are aware the Liberal Democrats voting percentage since its formation remained at above 15% of the national vote (a sizeable proportion of the population in itself) so it would seem only fair that the Liberal Democrats should receive a fair hearing on political broadcasts such as the one last night.
However, seemingly this wasn’t to be the case… Even on the week of the Iraq enquiry (which if my memory serves me correctly was an invasion that only the Lib Dems formally opposed in parliament), so why on this week of all weeks should the supposedly neutral BBC seek to nullify the word of the party, on (mainly) an issue where the party had a clearly distinct stance from Labour and the Conservatives. It seems particularly wrong when one considers the panel as a whole:
George Galloway- Respect MP opposed the Iraq war. However, at the same time Galloway is a former Labour MP (including under Blair’s premiership) so it would seem likely that he would have nothing unique to offer to other questions.
Claire Short- Again a Labour affiliated MP who was in the cabinet during much of Tony Blair’s premiership so one would think that despite her opinions on the war in Iraq she once again would hold generally the same views as the other Labour panellists.
Lord Faulkner- official Labour representative, I have no objection to Faulkner’s place on the panel asides from the fact that he is one of three Labour/former Labour politicians sat on the panel
Theresa May- Again I have no objection to May’s inclusion on the panel, it is only right that the Conservatives get their voice hear (no more important than that of the Liberal Democrats though really)
Melanie Phillips- I despise this woman and everything that she seemingly stands for both in her writing and her contribution to shows such as this one, her views are outdated, racist and hold no real place in modern Britain… I honestly wouldn’t give her the time of day, but again a (supposedly) impartial commentator is agreeable to have on the show (even a woman who spouts as much bile as Phillips)
I would ask the BBC to think very clearly about its conduct in the future as, although perhaps unintentional, it is seemingly stepping into a very grey area which is potentially damaging for British democracy, and as such the general public.
I look forward to your response and improved conduct on future BBC programming
Yours,
Dale Cox
Unbelievable postings.
Everyone knows that QT, especially on radio 4, is totally biased toward this government, and the chairman is also extremely biased toward them. In addition the programme papers the walls with their activists and fellow travellers – again nothing new.
Complaints resound and get lost in the huge bbc pit after a bureaucratic self serving email of “explanation”
As for Tory bias 2 years ago that is a ridiculous statement to make. The Tories have not had a fair hearing or sounding in over 10 years and are subject to far more strident intervention than the LibDems, who have done even better in the last 4 months on bbc spite of their smaller influence.
I would say the LibDems have shown in the last 3 months that they totally side with NuLabour in attacking the Conservatives on the majority of issues, so it is quite practical of the electorate to be able to foresee and fear a LabLib pact and possible “joint” government.
Could this influence the electorate to not vote LibDem because of this pact issue, in spite of half hearted Clegg protestations?
I don’t know, but it is a huge risk he is taking, as most Labour supporters are not in love with Brown, and would be very angry if he got in by the back door – and who would lose? The LibDems of course.
I have to say if all Tory spokespersons as inadequate as Teresa May last night, it might be better forthe Libdems if they are always featured on the program.
The PR/Comms department at Cowley Street seem very, very lax, ill-prepared and spend a lot of our money on staff who seem to do very little
The PR/Comms department at Cowley Street seem very, very lax, ill-prepared and spend a lot of our money on staff who seem to do very little. We need Paddy, Shirley or other big hitters on QT!
Except that it is the BBC who get to pick and book people for Question Time and not the parties.
you really think that the other parties allow themselves to be bullied into a negative pr position? (never)
5 Trackbacks
[…] your mind back two weeks, and you may recall the BBC making a hash of selecting its panel for the weekly political discussion show Question […]
[…] number of Lib Dems have complained, with gathering pace, about this lack of representation. The response from […]
[…] of Lib Dems have complained, with gathering pace, about this lack of representation. The response […]
[…] of Lib Dems have complained, with gathering pace, about this lack of representation. The response […]
[…] time, News, polly toynbee We’ve covered before the habit of BBC Question Time of dropping a Liberal Democrat from the panel (three times in four weeks most recently) and also of loading up the panel with a […]