Another election candidate faces court over alleged false statements

A defeated candidate from the May 2010 general election is facing court action following claims he made false statements during the election. The Portsmouth News reports:

Les Cummings, who stood as the city’s Justice and Anti-Corruption Party will appear at Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court on Friday, charged with breaching the Representation of the People Act.

Police at Fareham Police Station charged Mr Cummings on Thursday afternoon, with having made, on April 22, before an election, for the purpose of affecting candidate Mike Hancock, false statements that he knew to be untrue.

Meanwhile in other election law news, Nick Clegg has rejected calls from the Electoral Commission to change the rules for next May if there is a queue at a polling station at 10pm:

The elections watchdog said it was “disappointed” the government had ignored its call for legislation to prevent a repeat of angry scenes during May’s general election, when some people queuing to vote were turned away at the deadline…

Clegg told the Commons: “I’m acutely aware of the problem; I visited the polling stations several times on that day and saw the huge queues of people, many of whom who were in the end denied their democratic right to exercise a vote.

“The question then is – what do we do about it? I just so happen to think in this particular instance simply passing a law won’t deal with the problem.

“The problem was a lack of resources; the problem was poor organisation by the returning officer. That’s what we need to address – not always simply reach for the statute book,” he said. (The Guardian)

However, it is possible the House of Lords may take a different view on the matter and amend the electoral legislation that will shortly be before it.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • gramsci's eyes 11th Nov '10 - 10:22pm

    Sorry, read the headline and thought you were talking about Nick Clegg. We live in hope.

  • “Nick Clegg has rejected calls from the Electoral Commission to change the rules for next May if there is a queue at a polling station at 10pm:”

    Don’t really understand why he’s rejected these calls. My (outdated) Schofield says this is based on caselaw so might not even need primary legislation to deal with.

    I agree with his last point, however there is clearly always a possibility of a late rush to a polling station which can unexpectedly overwhelm even well organised polling officers.

  • another court case – and again, it is the Lib Dem candidate about whom lies have been told (I suppose at this stage I should say allegedly). Interesting.

  • James from Durham 12th Nov '10 - 10:34am

    This is pointless. The guy lost anyway. the police have better things to do. The point about Woolas is he won.

  • What really is interesting is that a complant went to the CPS about Hancock’s election material and the CPS decided not to persue because of ‘public interest’.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Richard Bird
    @Mohammed Amin You wrote "The EU will want to be sure that the UK if admitted to membership is not going to start talking about leaving yet again, and therefo...
  • Richard Bird
    @Mohammed Amin You wrote in reply to my post "the EU regards the Switzerland arrangements as so problematical that they are never going to do that again". Wh...
  • Zachary Adam Barker
    "So yes, we need to arm Ukraine more, but we should council for peace once that peace is achievable without rewarding the 2022 invasion." That means getting ...
  • Zachary Adam Barker
    "3) Russia resorting to nuclear weapons to prevent a military defeat." Why didn't they do it last year when they couldn't take Kyiv? or when the Kherson cou...
  • Martin
    Mohammed Amin - ???? Can you really incur massive penalties from HMRC for legal tax avoidance? Are all those with investments in ISAs liable for penalties...