Are ITV the unluckiest commissioner of opinion polls?

In the run-up to the 2005 general election, there was some excitement as a rolling poll commissioned by ITV from Populus showed the Conservatives slipping to a result even worse than 1997. However, there was a sharp (5 point) recovery in the final pre-election day poll from Populus, which was a normal non-rolling poll.

Picking over the polling after the election, the explanation looked to be one aberrant sample on one day but which, due to the workings of a rolling poll, ‘infected’ the poll results over a longer period of time. It was only with the final pre-election poll, based on a wholly new sample, that this was cleansed from the figures.

That was a reminder of the perils of rolling polls – one unluckily atypical sample hangs around.

Roll the clock forward then to this week and we’ve had two consecutive days of rolling poll results from ComRes which are significantly out of line with all the other polling being conducted (placing the Conservatives in a clear lead). But once again those figures look to be down to just one day’s sample which has hung around (a point Anthony Wells has also made here).

And the commissioner of the rolling poll this time? The Independent in partnership with … ITV once again.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

2 Comments

  • York Membery 22nd Apr '10 - 5:35pm

    TONIGHT’S DEBATE

    Speaking as a journalist, some of the bile being hurled Nick Clegg’s way in the run-up to tonight’s TV debate is beyond belief.

    Nazi slurs, ‘expense’ smears.. one paper even suggests people shouldn’t vote for him because he doesn’t watch the soaps!

    That said, I wonder if last week’s TV prime ministerial debate [being the first] will be the most significant, not only in terms of viewing figures, but in its effect on the campaign due to the sheer size of the TV audience.

    If so, the fact that NC did so well in that first debate might compensate for the fact that the next two debates might see less decisive a result.

    YM

  • Andrew Suffield 22nd Apr '10 - 6:39pm

    That’s more a demonstration of dodgily applied statistics. There are ways to summarise and collate data that are less sensitive to aberrant polls like in that case, but they aren’t being used.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    Jeremy, Please can you give the dates of the next three FPC meetings after 9th June? When you write, “This discussion then very helpfully informed an ea...
  • Marco
    I didn’t think that 2019 was as disastrous as many people thought. The result is a solid base to build on. Although the revoke policy was mistaken I am concer...
  • Marco
    I do despair of Lib Dems who claim Labour “aren’t progressive”. It was Labour governments who legalised divorce, abortion and same sex relations, abolis...
  • Andrew McCaig
    John, it is not having unitary councils that I object to (I am quite used to the unitary Kirklees Council), but to restricting local elections to once every fou...
  • Marco
    Congratulations to Sarah Green and everyone who campaigned and achieved a fantastic result. This result shows that the party is broadly on the right track. Y...