Are ITV the unluckiest commissioner of opinion polls?

In the run-up to the 2005 general election, there was some excitement as a rolling poll commissioned by ITV from Populus showed the Conservatives slipping to a result even worse than 1997. However, there was a sharp (5 point) recovery in the final pre-election day poll from Populus, which was a normal non-rolling poll.

Picking over the polling after the election, the explanation looked to be one aberrant sample on one day but which, due to the workings of a rolling poll, ‘infected’ the poll results over a longer period of time. It was only with the final pre-election poll, based on a wholly new sample, that this was cleansed from the figures.

That was a reminder of the perils of rolling polls – one unluckily atypical sample hangs around.

Roll the clock forward then to this week and we’ve had two consecutive days of rolling poll results from ComRes which are significantly out of line with all the other polling being conducted (placing the Conservatives in a clear lead). But once again those figures look to be down to just one day’s sample which has hung around (a point Anthony Wells has also made here).

And the commissioner of the rolling poll this time? The Independent in partnership with … ITV once again.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

2 Comments

  • York Membery 22nd Apr '10 - 5:35pm

    TONIGHT’S DEBATE

    Speaking as a journalist, some of the bile being hurled Nick Clegg’s way in the run-up to tonight’s TV debate is beyond belief.

    Nazi slurs, ‘expense’ smears.. one paper even suggests people shouldn’t vote for him because he doesn’t watch the soaps!

    That said, I wonder if last week’s TV prime ministerial debate [being the first] will be the most significant, not only in terms of viewing figures, but in its effect on the campaign due to the sheer size of the TV audience.

    If so, the fact that NC did so well in that first debate might compensate for the fact that the next two debates might see less decisive a result.

    YM

  • Andrew Suffield 22nd Apr '10 - 6:39pm

    That’s more a demonstration of dodgily applied statistics. There are ways to summarise and collate data that are less sensitive to aberrant polls like in that case, but they aren’t being used.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarManfarang 6th Aug - 1:58am
    There was the Lib-Lab pact, but generally Labour isn't interested in forming alliances.
  • User AvatarManfarang 6th Aug - 1:54am
    I am more bothered by Trump who isn't joking.
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 6th Aug - 1:15am
    And reps of key groups, but all elected!
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 6th Aug - 1:13am
    Michael I think a lot of the ideas on this are good, yours here too. We v must not forget the disability representation. Its usually...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 6th Aug - 12:44am
    Gordon, if you want a smaller committee of people 'with a strong and direct interest in making it work', I suppose that's what the new...
  • User AvatarSean Hagan 5th Aug - 11:22pm
    Many thanks to the authors for sharing this interesting SLF lecture. Clive Lewis is not a tribal ‘Labourite’, but an intelligent, independent-minded and principled Libertarian...