Mark Pack

Are the pollsters getting it wrong?

By | Fri 15th September 2006 - 12:52 pm

It’s pretty common for the polling companies at the moment to ask how people would vote with a Brown/Cameron/Campbell match-up, and the result typically is the Lib Dems dropping a few points compared with Blair/Cameron/Campbell.

But what do these figures really tell us? Take the latest Populus poll (full details here). It uses the question:

Q.5 Now I’d like you to think ahead to the next election, expected in 3 or 4 years time. Imagine that the Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown takes over from Tony Blair as Labour leader and the Conservatives are led by David Cameron and the Liberal Democrats by Ming Campbell. Which party would you vote for – or would you vote for another party or not vote at all?

That “3 or 4 years time” bit is crucial. It’s asking people how they think they will vote in the future AND under different leaders. The result doesn’t tell us whether changes from current voting intentions are due to different leaders or due to the imaginary vote being in 3-4 years time rather than today. Why does this matter? Well, it’s well known that the Lib Dems are good are picking up support from floating voters, so our support is often softer than that for other parties. Hence pushing the voting question into the future means it’s no surprise Lib Dem voters are less sure of who they’ll vote for than other parties.

Conclusion? The poll doesn’t tell us that the Lib Dems will do worse if Brown is leader.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Stephen Yolland
    Our policy platform is full of well meaning waffle. Our Leader (who is a nice guy) is uninspiring and over-earnest. Plus the electorate are bored with us, and h...
  • Jack
    Ed, the word you are after is 'racist'. 'Mean' is utterly inadequate. Do better. Now....
  • David Le Grice
    @Ynys Mon Man Try telling that to all the hard working candidates and activists in the many target wards where the Greens beat us with a paper candidate!...
  • Ynys Mon Man
    The Lib Dems are highly visible in roughly a third of Lincoln and perhaps 50% of York (both Labour-held at Westminster). Why is this? Because a small core of ac...
  • John McHugo
    @Simon McGrath - "It started with 6 Arab countries invading Israel intent on killing its Jewish population". That is just simply untrue and an outrageous st...