Author Archives: Chris Keating

Chris Keating

Opinion: Do Labour pick Ken and their bedrock, or win back the centre ground?

By Chris Keating | Fri 4th June 2010 - 2:10 pm

There’s been some interesting discussion on LabourList about whether Labour should – yet again – pick Ken Livingstone as their candidate for London Mayor. Declan Gaffney has made use of some very interesting research into the demographics of London elections (published here).

That demographic analysis deserves a long second look; and once you do, the picture isn’t pretty for anyone who wants Ken Livingstone to be elected as Mayor of London.

The most striking feature in the demographic facts and figures is the polarisation of London politics between 2004 and 2008. The study looks at the election results, ward …

Continue reading »
Posted in London and Op-eds | Tagged | 1 Comment
Chris Keating

Opinion: It’s deja vu all over again

By Chris Keating | Sun 24th June 2007 - 11:31 am

For me, every new speech by David Cameron brings an intense sense of deja vu.

It’s commonplace that the Cameron Conservative strategy is based on a detailed study of how Tony Blair and New Labour seized the centre ground and won elections. However, it’s increasingly clear that what Cameron has borrowed from Blair is not only an electoral strategy, but his entire philosophical baggage-train.

Blairism was never ideological. But in “New Britain”, a collection of speeches made in 1994-96, Blair laid out the philosophy behind his vision of a new politics and a new society. Economic security would be assured, from both recession and exploitation. But more importantly, a Labour government would build a new society based on mutuality and common values; and a new sort of politics which would give power back from Whitehall to ordinary people.

Continue reading »
Posted in News and Op-eds | Leave a comment
Chris Keating

Review: Britain After Blair – A Liberal Agenda

By Chris Keating | Wed 11th October 2006 - 8:00 pm

Britain After Blair“The Son of Orange Book” hasn’t had nearly as fiery a reception as its predecessor. One review described the original as ‘smelling faintly of brimstone’. No rumors of right-wing conspiracies have accompanied this volume. This autumn, the essays are more measured, and the potential future leadership candidates more cautious about what they say.

Stripped of its spin, the Orange Book was less than earth-shattering – and Britain After Blair is much the same. The two defining characteristics of the essays are that they are liberal, and intelligent.  At £10 for 14 essays and a detailed introduction, they are also decent value for money.

That said, some of the essays gave me a faint longing for something more, while a number of them are essentially arguments for existing party policy – cogent, but unadventurous.

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Tagged , and | 5 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Simon Robinson
    It's good to have an MP putting herself forward for this. The manifesto seems a bit vague though. All good thoughts and nothing you can really disagree with, b...
  • Robin Bennett
    I am sure Alan will have the sympathies of all of us. The situation is sad and frustrating. Forgive me for making one small point, Alan: you said that 40 Ho...
  • Jonathan Brown
    @George - me too. I know that not everyone is happy about this, but it's perfectly reasonable policy and I think all care is being taken to try to reassure thos...
  • George Thomas
    It follows the position of what I believe is a majority of UK population of supporting Israel but being against these unlawful settlements. Maybe not brave in t...
  • David Le Grice
    I don't get your point. Starmer's problem was that he had no charisma or any broader understanding of how to be popular. Boris Johnson managed to deliver the ...