Author Archives: Peter Jones

Peter Jones

Opinion: an easy £25 billion to cut

By Peter Jones | Thu 23rd September 2010 - 1:50 pm

I’m sorry I couldn’t join you at Liverpool, but my absence hopefully left more of the wine lake provided by our generous sponsors for the rest of you. As ‘cuts’ were in the air and in your conversations. I’d like to suggest an easy one.

HS2. Or High Speed (Rail) 2 to give its full title. The proposed new high speed rail link from London past Birmingham to the great cities of the North, such as Leeds. I’m told it may go near somewhere called Manchester as well on its way to Scotland.

Now I am no engineer. If the …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 68 Comments
Peter Jones

Conference policy motion: “Safe standing at football matches”

By Peter Jones | Sun 17th August 2008 - 2:00 pm

Introducing the first in our quick gen-up series of policy motions to be debated in Bournemouth. And we kick off (hehehe, geddit?) with the Safe Standing at Football Matches motion (F20) outlined for us by Peter Jones, who will be summing up at the debate.

What is the motion trying to achieve?

Allow folk to stand up to watch football matches.

Er…is that all?

Yes.

So what’s the problem?

Where seats are provided, for instance in most top-flight grounds that are ‘all-seater’, people aren’t allowed to stand up. Many people prefer to

…

Continue reading »
Posted in Conference | 29 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Steve Trevethan
    "Scottish Water generally achieves higher customer satisfaction scores and lower average houshold bills than private water companies in England" [AI Overview] ...
  • David Allen
    When political parties successfully resolve a problem by changing leader, they do it by identifying a person who stands for that change and promises to implemen...
  • Philip Broadbank
    Good to see I share my birthday with Lib Dem Voice! Happy birthday....
  • David Raw
    @ theakes. No....
  • George Thomas
    "Devolving more responsibilities means little if Wales isn’t given the funding.." In recent history we've seen Westminster refuse to put up the money in ra...