Why the latest BPIX poll is bad news for all parties

The Sunday Telegraph is running an opinion poll tomorrow about the levels of support for each party, commissioned from the pollster firm BPIX. It’s a switch from their usual pollster, and only the second time since the 2005 general election that BPIX has been used by a paper other than the Mail on Sunday.

It’s therefore potentially the start of a significant change in the pattern of polling and, regardless of what the figures in this poll say, the publication of the poll is bad news for all parties – and anyone who follows political news.

That’s because uniquely amongst the firms used regularly for national political opinion polling in the UK, BPIX is not a member of the British Polling Council (BPC), the trade body which lays down certain basic standards of transparency for polling. This isn’t just a technical matter, because not only is BPIX not a member of the BPC, but it also does not get close to meeting the BPC’s standards.

For example, BPC rule 2.2 requires:

Whenever it is practical to do so the following information should also be published:

  • Complete wording of questions upon which any data that has entered the public domain are based;
  • A web address where full computer tables may be viewed

This is crucial to allow people to scrutinise how a poll has actually been conducted and how reasonable the media coverage of the results really is.

By contrast, BPIX polls are shrouded in mystery. The BPIX website – www.bpix.co.uk – has been “under construction” for years, a particularly poor show as they are an internet pollster, and I’ve never received a reply to any of the emails I have sent them.

A practical example of the problems this brings: party leader ratings vary greatly depending on the exact wording of the question used. The Sunday Telegraph reports party leader ratings, but without telling us the question used you can’t tell how these really compare with other poll findings.

Whatever you think of opinion polls, they have a huge impact on political reporting (and so in turn on political realities, given the power of the media). It’s bad news for everyone if we are moving back to the days of opinion poll details being shrouded in mystery.

Let’s hope BPIX decide to sign up to the basic standards that other polling companies are happy to abide by.

UPDATES:

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Clegg's Candid Friend 28th Sep '08 - 1:06am

    And just in case anyone was wondering what that poll actually said, it said:
    CON 43%(-4)
    LAB 31%(+7)
    LDEM 17%(+1)
    (Changes are since a previous poll carried out 31 July-2 August.)

    Pretty much in line with the last two polls (from YouGov and ICM).

  • David from Ealing 28th Sep '08 - 8:44am

    Mark, so why is the Telegraph using them? Are they cheaper?

  • Cheaper? Maybe. Certainly easier to interpret according to your own preferences.

  • Hywel Morgan 28th Sep '08 - 12:18pm

    Isn’t another key point of the BPC guidelines that if you publish a poll you have to publish the whole thing?

    So you can’t (for example) publish the bit that says people’s opinion of David Cameron has improved because of his response to the financial crisis but leave out the bit that shows Brown/Darling are regarded as more competent to deal with it.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 24th Feb - 2:19am
    @Roland. Consultation Paper 134 on Tuition Fees does not, of course, represent party policy, which is yet to be decided by Conference, probably next September....
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 24th Feb - 12:28am
    Roland, Predictions are difficult to make, especially about the future - so goes the quip. Keynes in the 1920s predicted that productivity and incomes would...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 24th Feb - 12:11am
    Peter, to be fair to the associate professor he does not claim that the UK will face insolvency. His argument is "the falling pound and...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 23rd Feb - 11:22pm
    @ Micheal BG, "bigger government deficits will bigger government deficits will everything else being equal produce a bigger economy in that economy produce a bigger...
  • User AvatarRoland 23rd Feb - 11:09pm
    @Joe Burke - "The conclusion notes “Keynes believed that aggregate real income would continue to increase as more and more capital is accumulated. This increase...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 23rd Feb - 11:05pm
    @ David Raw When someone makes an incorrect statement even if it is off topic others should rebut it. Like Laurence Cox did with me....