Why the latest BPIX poll is bad news for all parties

The Sunday Telegraph is running an opinion poll tomorrow about the levels of support for each party, commissioned from the pollster firm BPIX. It’s a switch from their usual pollster, and only the second time since the 2005 general election that BPIX has been used by a paper other than the Mail on Sunday.

It’s therefore potentially the start of a significant change in the pattern of polling and, regardless of what the figures in this poll say, the publication of the poll is bad news for all parties – and anyone who follows political news.

That’s because uniquely amongst the firms used regularly for national political opinion polling in the UK, BPIX is not a member of the British Polling Council (BPC), the trade body which lays down certain basic standards of transparency for polling. This isn’t just a technical matter, because not only is BPIX not a member of the BPC, but it also does not get close to meeting the BPC’s standards.

For example, BPC rule 2.2 requires:

Whenever it is practical to do so the following information should also be published:

  • Complete wording of questions upon which any data that has entered the public domain are based;
  • A web address where full computer tables may be viewed

This is crucial to allow people to scrutinise how a poll has actually been conducted and how reasonable the media coverage of the results really is.

By contrast, BPIX polls are shrouded in mystery. The BPIX website – www.bpix.co.uk – has been “under construction” for years, a particularly poor show as they are an internet pollster, and I’ve never received a reply to any of the emails I have sent them.

A practical example of the problems this brings: party leader ratings vary greatly depending on the exact wording of the question used. The Sunday Telegraph reports party leader ratings, but without telling us the question used you can’t tell how these really compare with other poll findings.

Whatever you think of opinion polls, they have a huge impact on political reporting (and so in turn on political realities, given the power of the media). It’s bad news for everyone if we are moving back to the days of opinion poll details being shrouded in mystery.

Let’s hope BPIX decide to sign up to the basic standards that other polling companies are happy to abide by.

UPDATES:

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Clegg's Candid Friend 28th Sep '08 - 1:06am

    And just in case anyone was wondering what that poll actually said, it said:
    CON 43%(-4)
    LAB 31%(+7)
    LDEM 17%(+1)
    (Changes are since a previous poll carried out 31 July-2 August.)

    Pretty much in line with the last two polls (from YouGov and ICM).

  • David from Ealing 28th Sep '08 - 8:44am

    Mark, so why is the Telegraph using them? Are they cheaper?

  • Cheaper? Maybe. Certainly easier to interpret according to your own preferences.

  • Hywel Morgan 28th Sep '08 - 12:18pm

    Isn’t another key point of the BPC guidelines that if you publish a poll you have to publish the whole thing?

    So you can’t (for example) publish the bit that says people’s opinion of David Cameron has improved because of his response to the financial crisis but leave out the bit that shows Brown/Darling are regarded as more competent to deal with it.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 22nd May - 10:42am
    Suzanne Moore, reflecting on the wedding and sermon in today's Guardian, captures many of the contradictions and inequalities of modern Britain. If Liberal Democrats are...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 22nd May - 10:27am
    Ian Sanderson (RM3) 22nd May '18 - 9:49am. Switzerland also has a long history of referendums, partially affected by the Roman Catholic Church. Referendums around...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 22nd May - 10:10am
    Devolution in Scotland has produced the situation where the Scottish parliament has voted on the issue of what happens about powers returning from the EU...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 22nd May - 9:59am
    First let me express my sympathy with Elizabeth for what she went through, and to others with comparable experiences. I was in Dublin last week,...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 22nd May - 9:49am
    Switzerland has been mentioned (ironically with a total population close to my 5 million figure.) It has much less centralised structure than most countries. I...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 22nd May - 9:42am
    To answer the question: Devolution- what is it good for? It can deliver more responsive and efficient government than trying to run 50 million people...